A technology company is building a containerized web application on AWS that runs across multiple Availability Zones. The application architecture has two key storage requirements:
First, it requires a fully managed, shared file system that can be concurrently mounted by all container instances to access shared configuration files.
Second, it requires a cost-effective object storage solution to store user profile images that are accessed infrequently but must be available immediately when requested.
Which two AWS storage services should the company select to meet these requirements? (Select TWO.)
- Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)Cevap
- Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA)Cevap
- CAmazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS)
- DAmazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval
- EAmazon EC2 Instance Store
Cevap
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) and Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA)
The correct options are Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) and Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA). Amazon EFS provides a fully managed shared file system that can be accessed concurrently by multiple containers across Availability Zones, satisfying the first requirement. Amazon S3 Standard-IA offers lower-cost object storage for infrequently accessed files while still guaranteeing immediate (millisecond) retrieval times, satisfying the second requirement.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Selecting the appropriate AWS storage services (Amazon EFS for shared file storage and Amazon S3 Standard-IA for cost-effective, infrequently accessed object storage with immediate retrieval) based on application requirements.