A university research department is transitioning its scientific simulation workloads to AWS. These workloads run for approximately hours at the end of each month, requiring high-performance compute nodes. The rest of the month, the department only requires a single low-power server to host their results archive. The IT director is evaluating the economic impact of this migration compared to their legacy on-premises hardware.
Which of the following describes the most cost-effective provisioning strategy that illustrates the economic benefit of cloud elasticity for this workload?
- Deploying On-Demand Instances only for the hours the simulations run and terminating them immediately afterward, while running a single low-power instance continuously.Cevap
- BPurchasing a -year Reserved Instance contract for instances to guarantee that compute capacity is permanently available and reserved for the monthly simulation runs.
- CCapitalizing the virtual hardware costs upfront as a capital expense (CapEx) to establish a baseline of active instances, then converting the idle capacity into operating expenses (OpEx) when they are not in use.
- DStatically provisioning instances to remain active throughout the entire month to ensure the system has the scalability to handle the peak, which represents the AWS definition of elasticity.
Cevap
Deploying On-Demand Instances only for the hours the simulations run and terminating them immediately afterward, while running a single low-power instance continuously.
The correct answer demonstrates elasticity by running the high-performance compute nodes only when active ( hours a month) and terminating them when finished. This ensures the university only pays for what it uses, avoiding the cost of idle servers.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Cloud elasticity vs. static provisioning, and the pay-as-you-go consumption model.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s