An international shipping organization is preparing to migrate its legacy container tracking system to AWS. The project must be completed within a strict three-month timeline before their on-premises data center lease expires.
The web tier consists of a monolithic Java application running on Apache Tomcat. The operations team wants to eliminate host-level operating system administration by moving to containerized tasks, but the development team has no capacity to modify the application codebase.
The database tier is powered by a Microsoft SQL Server database. The infrastructure team wants to eliminate operating system patching overhead and simplify license management, but they cannot convert the database engine or schema within the given timeline.
Finally, a legacy reporting service requires a specialized physical hardware security key plugged directly into a local server. This service is slated for decommissioning in nine months, and no budget is allocated for its modification.
Which combination of migration strategies should the solutions architect select to satisfy these requirements? (Select TWO.)
- Replatform the web tier by containerizing the Tomcat application for Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate, and replatform the database tier to Amazon RDS for SQL Server.Cevap
- Retain the legacy reporting service on-premises until it is decommissioned.Cevap
- CRefactor the database tier by converting the SQL Server database to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL using the AWS Schema Conversion Tool (SCT) to eliminate database licensing costs.
- DRehost the legacy reporting service on Amazon EC2 using AWS Application Migration Service (MGN) to centralize all workloads on AWS.
- ERehost the web tier on Amazon EC2 using AWS Application Migration Service (MGN), and refactor the database tier to Amazon RDS for SQL Server.