An organization has two departments, Finance and HR, that run workloads in separate Azure subscriptions. Regulatory compliance requires that HR administrators must not have access to Finance security logs, and Finance administrators must not have access to HR security logs. You need to design an Azure Monitor log routing architecture that enforces this boundary. Which architecture should you recommend?
- Create separate Log Analytics workspaces for the Finance and HR subscriptions, and route the diagnostic logs of each subscription to its respective workspace.Cevap
- BDeploy a single centralized Log Analytics workspace, route logs from both subscriptions to this workspace, and configure workspace-level access control permissions.
- CDeploy separate Log Analytics workspaces for each department, and assign the Log Analytics Reader role directly to individual administrator user accounts.
- DCreate separate Log Analytics workspaces for each department, and use an Azure Policy with a Deny effect to deploy diagnostic settings automatically for all new resources.
Cevap
Create separate Log Analytics workspaces for the Finance and HR subscriptions, and route the diagnostic logs of each subscription to its respective workspace.
Creating separate Log Analytics workspaces for the Finance and HR subscriptions ensures that log data is stored in isolated repositories. This satisfies the strict regulatory compliance requirement by preventing cross-department access to security logs, as workspace-level permissions can be restricted to authorized personnel of each department.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Log Analytics Workspace as an Administrative Boundary