An enterprise is modernizing a media streaming platform in Azure. The system consists of two primary endpoints:
1. A management API endpoint that receives HTTP/HTTPS control messages on port 443. The API requires URL path-based routing (e.g., `/stream/start` vs `/stream/stop`) and SSL/TLS termination.
2. A real-time video stream ingestion endpoint that receives continuous UDP traffic on port 8080.
The backend virtual machines (VMs) processing both workloads are deployed within a Virtual Machine Scale Set (VMSS) across multiple Availability Zones for high availability. To reduce costs, the networking team proposes deploying:
* An Azure Application Gateway (Standard v2) to load balance the HTTP/HTTPS management API.
* A Basic SKU Azure Load Balancer to load balance the UDP streaming traffic.
Why will the proposed load balancing configuration fail to deploy?
- AThe proposed design must replace the Application Gateway with Azure Traffic Manager to perform the URL path-based routing and SSL/TLS termination at the global level.
- The virtual machine scale set instances cannot be associated with both the Standard SKU Application Gateway and the Basic SKU Load Balancer backend pools simultaneously, as mixing Basic and Standard SKU load balancing resources on the same network interfaces is not supported.Cevap
- CThe backend virtual machine scale set instances must be consolidated into a single Availability Zone because Application Gateway Standard v2 cannot distribute traffic to zone-redundant backend pools.
- DThe configuration requires a custom User Defined Route (UDR) to redirect the UDP traffic through the Application Gateway subnet, which will override default system routes and cause a network routing loop.