A network administrator is evaluating traffic filtering on a Cisco IOS router configured with the following extended IPv4 access control list:
access-list 110 permit tcp 10.2.0.0 0.0.255.255 host 192.168.50.25 eq 22
access-list 110 deny ip 10.2.0.0 0.0.255.255 host 192.168.50.25
access-list 110 permit ip any any
Which two operational outcomes will occur when this access control list is applied inbound on interface GigabitEthernet0/0? (Select TWO.)
- SSH traffic originating from host 10.2.15.5 and destined to host 192.168.50.25 is permitted by the router.Cevap
- HTTP traffic (TCP port 80) originating from host 10.2.15.5 and destined to host 192.168.50.25 is denied by the router.Cevap
- CAll IP traffic originating from host 10.3.1.1 and destined to host 192.168.50.25 is dropped by the implicit deny clause.
- DICMP echo requests originating from host 10.2.15.5 and destined to host 192.168.50.25 are permitted because ICMP is not a TCP protocol.
Cevap
SSH traffic from host 10.2.15.5 to 192.168.50.25 is permitted, and HTTP traffic (TCP port 80) from host 10.2.15.5 to 192.168.50.25 is denied.
Access control lists evaluate packets sequentially from top to bottom until a match is found. For SSH traffic from host 10.2.15.5 to 192.168.50.25, line 1 matches because 10.2.15.5 falls within subnet 10.2.0.0/16 (wildcard 0.0.255.255) and SSH operates on TCP port 22; therefore, SSH traffic is permitted. For HTTP traffic (TCP port 80) from host 10.2.15.5 to 192.168.50.25, it bypasses line 1 because of the port mismatch, but matches line 2 because the 'ip' keyword encompasses all IPv4 payloads including TCP; therefore, HTTP traffic is denied.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Extended IPv4 Access Control List sequential top-down evaluation, protocol matching, and implicit/explicit statement processing.