Refer to the following Cisco IOS CLI output from switch Switch-A:
text
Switch-A# show interfaces fastEthernet 0/1
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0007.ebaa.1101
Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, media type is 100BASE-TX
...
12540 input errors, 12538 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 late collisions, 0 deferred
Switch-A connects directly to Switch-B over a 10-meter Category 5e UTP cable. Switch-B reports high counts of late collisions on its corresponding interface. Which condition is the root cause of these interface symptoms?
- A duplex mismatch where Switch-A is operating in full-duplex mode and Switch-B is operating in half-duplex mode.Cevap
- BAn incorrect Ethernet cable pinout where a rollover cable was installed instead of a straight-through cable.
- CA native VLAN mismatch where Switch-A is configured for Native VLAN 1 and Switch-B is configured for Native VLAN 10.
- DA Layer 2 neighbor discovery mismatch where Switch-A failed to parse CDP network interface Type-Length-Values (TLVs).
Cevap
The root cause is a duplex mismatch where Switch-A is set to full-duplex and Switch-B is set to half-duplex.
A duplex mismatch occurs when one end of an Ethernet link operates in full-duplex mode while the opposite end operates in half-duplex mode. Because the full-duplex device (Switch-A) transmits data without performing carrier sensing, it frequently sends frames while the half-duplex device (Switch-B) is actively transmitting. This causes Switch-B to detect collisions after sending the initial 64 bytes of a frame (late collisions), while Switch-A receives aborted frame fragments from Switch-B, registering them as CRC and FCS input errors.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Duplex Mismatch Symptom Analysis
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s