An enterprise security audit reveals two critical vulnerabilities in a campus network infrastructure: administrative command entries sent to network switches during remote management sessions are logged in cleartext without granular per-command authorization, and unauthorized rogue devices plugged into active wall jacks in common areas gain immediate access to internal network segments. Which two security mitigations directly resolve these specific vulnerabilities? (Select two.)
- Implementing TACACS+ for network device administration to mandate command-by-command authorization and encrypt the full packet payload.Cevap
- Configuring Port Security on access switch ports to restrict link connectivity to authorized MAC addresses.Cevap
- CDeploying RADIUS for device administration because it provides complete packet body encryption for all administrative command authorization requests.
- DApplying a standard IPv4 ACL on all access switch ports containing explicit permit statements for authorized management subnets.
Cevap
Implementing TACACS+ for network device administration and configuring Port Security on access switch ports directly resolve the administrative cleartext/authorization gap and unauthorized physical access vulnerabilities.
The correct mitigations are implementing TACACS+ for device administration and configuring Port Security on access switch ports. TACACS+ operates over TCP port 49, encrypts the complete packet body, and permits granular authorization of individual administrative CLI commands. Port Security secures Layer 2 physical access ports by permitting only specified MAC addresses, effectively blocking rogue devices plugged into physical wall jacks.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
AAA Framework Differences and Layer 2 Access Control Mitigations