A network technician is diagnosing performance degradation on a 2.4 GHz wireless network in an office environment. A wireless spectrum analyzer shows that three neighboring access points are configured to use Channel 1, Channel 2, and Channel 6. Users connected to the access point on Channel 2 experience severe packet drops and frame corruption, while users on Channels 1 and 6 maintain stable connections despite high traffic volume. Which of the following best explains why Channel 2 exhibits significantly higher frame corruption than Channels 1 and 6?
- Channel 2 causes adjacent channel interference with Channels 1 and 6, generating uncoordinated RF noise that disrupts CSMA/CA clear-channel assessments.Cevap
- BChannel 2 is restricted to a maximum 10 MHz channel bandwidth in the 2.4 GHz spectrum, causing throughput bottlenecks during peak utilization.
- CChannel 2 experiences co-channel interference that forces access points to automatically disable OFDM modulation and fall back to DSSS.
- DChannel 2 operates at a lower central frequency transmit power limit under regulatory guidelines compared to primary channels 1, 6, and 11.
Cevap
Channel 2 causes adjacent channel interference with Channels 1 and 6, generating uncoordinated RF noise that disrupts CSMA/CA clear-channel assessments.
The correct option identifies that Channel 2 creates adjacent channel interference (ACI) with both Channels 1 and 6. In the 2.4 GHz ISM band, each 20 MHz channel spacing requires 25 MHz separation between center frequencies to avoid overlap. Because Wi-Fi radios on Channel 2 cannot decode preamble headers from signals centered on Channels 1 or 6, they treat those transmissions as raw noise. Consequently, CSMA/CA clear-channel assessment fails to defer transmission, resulting in high rates of frame collisions and retransmissions.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Adjacent Channel Interference vs. Co-Channel Interference in 2.4 GHz Wireless Networks
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s