An IT security technician is finalizing a data destruction workflow for a decommissioned enterprise storage array that contains both magnetic Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) and Solid-State Drives (SSDs). The technician plans to pass all drives through a powerful magnetic degausser as the primary sanitization step before sending the hardware off-site for physical shredding. Which of the following identifies the most critical security flaw in this proposed workflow?
- Degaussing is ineffective for solid-state drives because flash memory does not store data magnetically, leaving the data on the SSDs fully intact.Cevap
- BDegaussing solid-state drives will render the wear-leveling controller unusable, preventing the issuance of a valid Certificate of Destruction.
- CMagnetic HDDs must undergo a zero-fill overwrite pass before degaussing to ensure that track alignment remains intact for physical recycling.
- DSolid-state drives require multi-pass zero-filling instead of physical shredding to achieve purge-level sanitization under NIST guidelines.
Cevap
Degaussing is ineffective for solid-state drives because flash memory does not store data magnetically, leaving the data on the SSDs fully intact.
Degaussing exposes media to a powerful magnetic field to eliminate stored magnetic patterns. While highly effective for magnetic hard disk drives (HDDs) and magnetic tapes, it does not affect semiconductor flash memory used in solid-state drives (SSDs). Therefore, applying a degausser to SSDs leaves the stored data completely intact.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Selecting media-appropriate data destruction techniques (Degaussing for magnetic media vs. Cryptographic Erase/Purge/Physical Shredding for solid-state media)