A network technician is investigating performance degradation on a desktop host connected to switch port FastEthernet 0/12. The switch port speed and duplex settings were manually configured to 100 Mbps and Full Duplex, while the desktop network adapter was left on auto-negotiation. Running the `show interface fastEthernet 0/12` command reveals a rapidly incrementing counter for late collisions and Frame Check Sequence (FCS) errors.
Which of the following is the root cause of this connectivity issue?
- A duplex mismatch caused by the desktop adapter auto-negotiating to Half Duplex while the switch port is fixed at Full Duplex.Cevap
- BA native VLAN mismatch causing untagged traffic from the desktop to be dropped by the switch port.
- CA VLAN isolation issue where the host and switch port belong to different broadcast domains without a Layer 3 router.
- DSpanning Tree Protocol continuously blocking port FastEthernet 0/12 due to an STP root bridge priority election.
Cevap
The root cause is a duplex mismatch resulting from the host network adapter auto-negotiating to Half Duplex while the switch interface is manually hardcoded to Full Duplex.
The correct answer identifies a duplex mismatch caused by mismatched negotiation modes. Standard IEEE auto-negotiation rules state that if one endpoint is manually set to fixed speed and duplex (e.g. 100/Full) and the other is set to auto-negotiate, the auto-negotiating side can sense speed but cannot detect duplex mode, defaulting to Half Duplex. The resulting collision domain mismatch causes late collisions and FCS errors on the switch interface.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Duplex Mismatch Diagnosis and IEEE Auto-Negotiation Fallback Rules