An enterprise network engineer is troubleshooting interconnectivity between two switches, SW-East and SW-West. The switches are connected via a direct fiber link on interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24.
The interface configuration on SW-East is:
text
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,30
The interface configuration on SW-West is:
text
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,100
Workstations in VLAN 30 connected to SW-East cannot reach resources in VLAN 30 connected to SW-West, while devices on VLAN 10 and VLAN 20 function normally across both switches. System diagnostic logs report no native VLAN mismatch errors.
Which of the following best explains why traffic for VLAN 30 fails to traverse the trunk link?
- VLAN 30 is omitted from the allowed VLAN list on SW-West, causing ingress frames tagged with VLAN 30 to be dropped by SW-West.Cevap
- BBecause native VLAN 100 is explicitly configured, all untagged traffic is automatically mapped to VLAN 30 on ingress, starving tagged VLAN 30 frames.
- CInter-switch communication between identical non-native VLANs requires an intermediary Layer 3 router when custom native VLAN IDs are assigned.
- DSpanning Tree Protocol automatically puts VLAN 30 into a blocking state on SW-East because the native VLAN ID is numerically higher than 30.