A network engineer is troubleshooting high packet loss and throughput degradation on an 8 km 10GBASE-LR single-mode fiber link connecting two core switches. The switch SFP+ modules report optical receive power levels comfortably within receiver sensitivity thresholds ( received vs. a receiver sensitivity range of to ). Interface counters show zero FCS or CRC frame errors. An Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer (OTDR) test reveals a high-amplitude reflective Fresnel spike with an Optical Return Loss (ORL) of at , while overall fiber end-to-end attenuation remains normal at . Concurrently, packet captures exhibit repeated TCP Out-of-Order and Fast Retransmission packets. Which of the following physical layer anomalies is the primary cause of the degradation?
- A contaminated or damaged optical connector at 3.2 km causing high back-reflection that destabilizes the transmitter laser diode.Cevap
- BA severe macrobend in the optical fiber at 3.2 km inducing non-reflective localized power loss.
- CA speed and duplex auto-negotiation mismatch between the two 10GBASE-LR transceiver interfaces.
- DAn incorrect TCP Maximum Segment Size (MSS) negotiation occurring during the initial three-way handshake.