A network engineer is configuring an 802.1Q trunk link between two switches, SW-CORE-01 and SW-ACCESS-02, to carry traffic for VLAN 10 (Data), VLAN 20 (Voice), and VLAN 99 (Native/Management). Interface GigabitEthernet0/1 on SW-CORE-01 is configured with `switchport trunk native vlan 99`. However, interface GigabitEthernet0/1 on SW-ACCESS-02 was accidentally left with default settings (`switchport trunk native vlan 1`). If a host on SW-ACCESS-02 transmits unencapsulated (untagged) Ethernet frames into GigabitEthernet0/1, how will SW-CORE-01 handle these incoming frames, and what security/operational issue will occur?
- SW-CORE-01 will associate the untagged frames with VLAN 99, causing traffic sent on VLAN 1 from SW-ACCESS-02 to leak into VLAN 99 on SW-CORE-01.Cevap
- BSW-CORE-01 will drop all untagged frames automatically because 802.1Q trunk ports reject any frame that lacks a 4-byte 802.1Q VLAN header.
- CSW-CORE-01 will forward the untagged frames to all ports across all configured VLANs because untagged frames act as global switch broadcasts.
- DSW-CORE-01 will encapsulate the untagged frames with an 802.1Q header for VLAN 1 and relay them to SW-ACCESS-02 without generating operational logs.
Cevap
SW-CORE-01 will associate the untagged frames with VLAN 99, leading to cross-VLAN traffic leakage between VLAN 1 (on SW-ACCESS-02) and VLAN 99 (on SW-CORE-01).
IEEE 802.1Q trunking sends frames belonging to the native VLAN untagged over the link. When a receiving switch gets an untagged frame on a trunk interface, it maps that frame to its local native VLAN configuration. Because SW-CORE-01 has its native VLAN set to VLAN 99, any untagged frame sent by SW-ACCESS-02 (originating from its native VLAN 1) will be placed directly into VLAN 99 on SW-CORE-01, causing cross-VLAN traffic leakage and potential Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) inconsistencies.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
802.1Q Native VLAN Ingress Processing and Mismatch Behavior