During a forensic analysis at a financial services organization, network engineers discover that an attacker executed a man-in-the-middle attack on an internal subnet between an application server and a SQL database. The attacker intercepted automated database queries and modified financial balances inside the packet payloads in transit without interrupting the TCP session or altering packet lengths. System uptime, server access, and network performance remained completely normal throughout the event. Which security principle of the CIA triad was directly violated, and which security control best mitigates this vulnerability?
- AConfidentiality; this should be mitigated by enforcing WPA3-Enterprise authentication across all internal switches.
- BAvailability; this should be mitigated by deploying SNMPv3 with authPriv to monitor system uptime and alert administrators to data packet changes.
- CNon-repudiation; this should be mitigated by replacing RADIUS with TACACS+ to encrypt the PDU payload between hosts.
- Integrity; this should be mitigated by enforcing IPsec using Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) or HMAC message authentication to prevent undetected data tampering.Cevap
Cevap
Integrity was compromised because the transaction payload was modified during transmission. Deploying IPsec with Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) or HMAC message authentication protects data integrity.
The scenario describes an unauthorized alteration of data during transmission between two endpoints without causing downtime or session loss. Integrity ensures that information remains unchanged and untampered with while stored or in transit. Implementing IPsec ESP or HMAC integrity checks ensures that any modified packet is detected via hash mismatch and immediately dropped.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
CIA Triad - Integrity & Cryptographic Message Protection
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s