A network technician is investigating poor application throughput and significant packet loss on an enterprise host connected to switch interface FastEthernet 0/12. Output from the switch console reveals a high count of late collisions, frame check sequence (FCS) errors, and deferred transmissions on the port. A review of device settings shows that the host network interface card (NIC) was manually forced to 100 Mbps Full Duplex, while the connected switchport is configured with default auto-negotiation parameters. Which of the following best explains the root cause of this performance issue?
- The switchport failed auto-negotiation, defaulting to half-duplex mode and creating a duplex mismatch with the full-duplex host.Cevap
- BThe switchport's 802.1Q native VLAN is mismatched with the untagged management VLAN assigned to the host NIC.
- CThe switchport is experiencing Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) topology change notifications due to an invalid STP root bridge priority setting.
- DThe host is attempting to communicate with devices on another VLAN without an operational Layer 3 routing interface.
Cevap
The switchport failed auto-negotiation, defaulting to half-duplex mode and creating a duplex mismatch with the full-duplex host.
When an Ethernet interface configured for auto-negotiation connects to a link partner configured for forced (manual) full-duplex, auto-negotiation fails to detect the duplex mode. By IEEE standard convention, the auto-negotiation interface sets its speed using parallel detection but defaults its duplex setting to half-duplex. This mismatch causes the full-duplex side to transmit at will while the half-duplex side detects collisions during transmission after the standard 64-byte slot time (late collisions), leading to FCS errors and severe throughput degradation.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Duplex Mismatch Troubleshooting & Auto-Negotiation Fallback Rules