Soru

Zorluk: OrtaNetwork Security Monitoring and Alerting

A Security Operations Center (SOC) analyst is reviewing network security monitoring alerts generated by a Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) sensor inspecting perimeter egress traffic. The sensor triggers a high-severity alert for an outbound TCP session originating from an internal host (10.2.14.5010.2.14.50) to an external server (198.51.100.89198.51.100.89):

src_ip: 10.2.14.50
src_port: 51024
dest_ip: 198.51.100.89
dest_port: 443
transport: tcp
detected_protocol: ssh
expected_protocol: tls
alert_type: Protocol Mismatch / Evasion

Based on the log snippet provided, which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this network security monitoring alert?

  1. An internal host is attempting to bypass perimeter egress filtering by tunneling SSH traffic over standard HTTPS port 443.Cevap
  2. B
    A remote attacker is executing a SQL injection attack against an internal database server by encapsulating SQL commands in TLS payloads.
  3. C
    The perimeter network monitoring sensor functioned as a preventive control by dropping packets associated with an unverified TLS certificate.
  4. D
    A production honeypot triggered an alert after capturing an inbound unauthorized connection attempt on a deceptive service listener.

Cevap

The alert indicates an internal host attempting to bypass perimeter egress filtering by tunneling SSH traffic over standard HTTPS port 443.
The NTA sensor alert highlights a protocol mismatch where an outbound session on TCP port 443 (typically allocated for HTTPS/TLS) contains SSH protocol signatures. Adversaries and users frequently attempt to evade perimeter security controls and firewall restrictions by encapsulating unauthorized protocols (such as SSH) over common outbound ports like 443.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the source, destination, and port details in the alert log.
The source is internal host 10.2.14.5010.2.14.50 sending traffic outbound to external IP 198.51.100.89198.51.100.89 on destination port 443.
Establishing traffic flow direction confirms this is an outbound egress event.
2
Compare expected_protocol with detected_protocol.
Destination port 443 normally carries TLS/SSL traffic, but deep packet inspection detected SSH protocol banners/payloads.
Mismatched protocol and port signatures reveal an evasion technique intended to conceal non-HTTPS traffic inside a standard allowed egress port.
3
Determine the security significance of the protocol anomaly.
Adversaries or policy-violating users often run SSH servers on port 443 to tunnel restricted protocols out of a network.
Identifying protocol tunneling over non-standard ports enables analysts to investigate potential command-and-control (C2) or data exfiltration channels.

Anahtar Kavram

Network Security Monitoring and Protocol Anomaly Detection
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla