An enterprise financial institution relies on a legacy mainframe system to process batch payments. A security compliance audit reveals that the mainframe application cannot natively support TLS 1.3 network transport encryption due to legacy protocol stack limitations. To satisfy data-in-transit security requirements without taking the system offline, the security engineering team deploys an inline hardware cryptographic proxy that intercepts outbound mainframe communications and encapsulates them inside an encrypted IPsec tunnel across the internal network. Which of the following best classifies the deployment of the hardware cryptographic proxy?
- Technical category and Compensating functional typeCevap
- BTechnical category and Preventive functional type
- COperational category and Corrective functional type
- DManagerial category and Directive functional type
Cevap
Technical category and Compensating functional type
The deployment of an inline hardware cryptographic proxy is executed via automated hardware technology, placing it firmly within the Technical (Logical) control category. Functionally, because native TLS 1.3 application encryption (the baseline primary control) cannot be implemented due to legacy system limitations, the proxy serves as an alternative control to achieve equivalent data protection. Controls implemented to satisfy a security requirement when a primary control is unfeasible are classified as Compensating controls.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Security Control Categories and Functional Types