During a post-incident review at a logistics company, security analysts discovered that an administrator modified system event logs and disputed making any changes. The logging infrastructure maintained file integrity using standalone SHA-256 hashes stored alongside the logs, but because multiple staff members had write permissions to update those hash files, individual accountability could not be established. Which of the following solutions should the organization implement to achieve non-repudiation for log updates?
- Asymmetric digital signatures generated using individual private keysCevap
- BCryptographic hash generation using SHA-256 for each log batch
- CSymmetric bulk encryption using AES-256 with a shared secret key
- DRole-Based Access Control restricting log file permissions to read-only
Cevap
Asymmetric digital signatures generated using individual private keys
Digital signatures enforce non-repudiation by combining a cryptographic hash with asymmetric key pairs. Because the private key is strictly held by a single individual, any signature verified using that individual's public key conclusively proves origin and authenticity, preventing the sender from denying their action.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Non-Repudiation vs. Integrity in the CIA Triad
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s