A security analyst receives a high-severity alert from an inline Network Intrusion Prevention System (NIPS) indicating potential encrypted command-and-control (C2) beaconing originating from an internal endpoint to an untrusted external IP address. In what sequence should the analyst execute the network security monitoring and initial containment workflow?
- 1Correlate the NIPS alert with SIEM event logs and host context to verify alert authenticity and rule out a false positive.
- 2Initiate network isolation of the affected endpoint to prevent lateral movement and further outbound communications.
- 3Query historical NetFlow logs and packet captures (PCAP) to analyze traffic patterns and quantify potential data exfiltration.
- 4Apply perimeter firewall blocks and DNS sinkholing for the identified external command-and-control IP address and domain.
- 5Perform host-based forensic investigation to identify and purge the malicious process establishing the network socket.
Cevap
The correct response workflow begins with alert correlation in the SIEM, followed by isolating the endpoint, querying NetFlow and packet captures to quantify damage, implementing perimeter blocks, and finally conducting host forensic remediation.
The workflow follows standard incident response procedures: validation (verifying SIEM/NIPS alert), containment (host network isolation), investigation/scoping (NetFlow/PCAP analysis), enterprise protection (perimeter block/sinkholing), and eradication/remediation (host forensics).
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Incident Response Triage and Containment Workflow in Network Security Monitoring