A nationwide agricultural supply chain enterprise is modernizing its legacy crop yield forecasting platform by migrating to Google Cloud. Executive stakeholders mandate that the migration must not disrupt regional field teams who have limited cloud experience, while engineering leaders must ensure that infrastructure capacity is fully available prior to the upcoming high-volume harvest season. As the Principal Cloud Architect, which strategy best aligns GCP technical governance with stakeholder and organizational change management requirements?
- Conduct a phased regional rollout supported by role-based training programs, while pre-emptively auditing regional resource limits and requesting GCP quota increases well in advance of peak harvest workloads.Cevap
- BExecute a full nationwide cutover during the peak harvest week to avoid parallel running costs, deferring resource capacity expansion requests until automated auto-scaling alerts indicate quota limits are reached.
- CAccelerate adoption by granting Project Owner primitive IAM roles to regional operation managers so they can bypass central IT bottlenecks and self-provision necessary resources.
- DRely strictly on standard IAM user permissions to protect proprietary yield data, opting against VPC Service Controls perimeters to simplify initial network setup for field teams.
Cevap
Conduct a phased regional rollout supported by role-based training programs, while pre-emptively auditing regional resource limits and requesting GCP quota increases well in advance of peak harvest workloads.
Combining a phased regional rollout with targeted training ensures field personnel are properly onboarded without operational disruption. Additionally, proactively requesting GCP quota increases ensures the platform can scale to handle heavy harvest workloads without running into service quota limits.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Organizational Change Management and Proactive Infrastructure Governance