To boost regional farm earnings during droughts, a state agricultural agency plans to subsidize half the cost of a new drought-resistant wheat seed for local farmers. Because this new strain yields 25 percent more grain per acre during dry spells than traditional strains, agency officials claim the subsidy program will increase net agricultural revenue across the region during drought years. Which of the following would be most useful to determine in evaluating the likelihood that the agency's plan will achieve its intended goal?
- Whether the market price per bushel of wheat declines disproportionately when regional supply increases during drought years.Cevap
- BWhether the synthetic chemical treatment required for the new seed strain reduces the long-term soil fertility needed for non-wheat rotational crops.
- CWhether neighboring agricultural districts intend to introduce similar subsidized crop programs within the next decade.
- DWhether traditional wheat strains can survive mild dry spells using smaller quantities of water than previously estimated.
- EWhether the agricultural agency currently earns a profit on the distribution of other subsidized farm inputs.
Cevap
Determining whether the market price per bushel drops disproportionately when supply rises provides the necessary test of variance to evaluate whether increased yield translates into increased net agricultural revenue.
The plan relies on the mathematical assumption that a 25 percent increase in grain volume will increase total revenue. However, Total Revenue = Price × Quantity. If increasing local output causes the market price per bushel to drop significantly, total revenue could decrease despite the higher yield. Determining the price behavior under increased supply is therefore critical for evaluating the plan.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Evaluating Plan Efficacy via Test of Variance