Consider the following excerpt from an economic history of nineteenth-century Ottoman muni… — GMAT

Consider the following excerpt from an economic history of nineteenth-century Ottoman municipal finance:

"While nineteenth-century Ottoman fiscal reformers routinely blamed the persistent deficits of provincial treasuries on the administrative costs of tax farming (iltizam), Reşid Pasha’s 1845 financial audit revealed that provincial revenue shortfalls occurred primarily because local merchants systematically underreported agricultural yields prior to tax assessment, regardless of whether tax collection was managed directly by state bureaucrats or auctioned to private tax farmers."

Statement: Based on the excerpt, replacing private tax farmers with direct state administration would not, on its own, eliminate the primary factor driving provincial treasury deficits.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

True. The target sentence establishes that merchant yield underreporting was the main driver of treasury shortfalls and occurred under both direct state administration and tax farming; thus, replacing tax farmers with state bureaucrats would not eliminate the primary cause.

The correct evaluation is True because the passage explicitly identifies merchant yield underreporting as the primary driver of deficits and clarifies that this underreporting took place under both direct state administration and private tax farming. Consequently, switching exclusively to state administration would fail to eliminate the primary cause of the shortfalls.

Adım Adım Çözüm

Identify the primary cause of provincial treasury shortfalls according to the text.

The text identifies the primary cause as local merchants systematically underreporting agricultural yields prior to tax assessment.

Determining the root cause established by empirical audit in the text is necessary to evaluate statements about resolving deficits.

Analyze the scope condition attached to the primary cause.

The text specifies that this underreporting occurred 'regardless of whether tax collection was managed directly by state bureaucrats or auctioned to private tax farmers.'

This modifier proves that the method of collection (state bureaucrats vs. private tax farmers) did not affect the occurrence of underreporting.

Evaluate the truth value of the statement regarding replacing tax farmers.

Since underreporting happens under state administration just as it does under tax farming, changing the administration method to state collection would leave the underreporting intact.

Strict logical deduction confirms that altering a non-causal variable does not eliminate the primary cause of the outcome.

Anahtar Kavram

Single-Sentence Inference: Fact-Based Scope Limitation

Tahmini Süre:1m 30s

Soru

Cevap

Adım Adım Çözüm

Anahtar Kavram

Sık Yapılan Hatalar

Konular

Bu konudan daha fazla soru