Soru

Zorluk: OrtaNegative Factual and EXCEPT Questions

Passage:
During the seventeenth century, the Venetian Republic implemented rigorous regulatory measures to preserve the monopoly of its glassmaking industry centered on the island of Murano. Historians long maintained that state policies relied exclusively on punitive measures, such as property confiscations and imprisonment of artisans attempting unauthorized emigration. However, recent archival evidence reveals a more complex strategy. Guild magistrates frequently offered positive economic incentives, including tax remissions and low-interest capital loans, to retain master artisans facing financial distress. Furthermore, state officials routinely granted temporary travel permits to glassmakers visiting foreign courts, provided their overseas operations relied on Murano for purified soda ash. Judicial records show that illicit technology transfer occurred primarily through itinerant apprentices, who were excluded from state subsidies, rather than through master glassmakers.

Statement: Based on the passage, Venetian authorities provided financial subsidies to itinerant apprentices in order to prevent unauthorized technological transfer.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

The statement is False. The passage explicitly states that itinerant apprentices were excluded from state financial subsidies, whereas positive financial incentives were reserved for master artisans.
The statement is False because the passage explicitly states that itinerant apprentices 'were excluded from state financial subsidies.' Financial subsidies were offered to master artisans, not apprentices.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate details regarding itinerant apprentices and state financial subsidies in the passage.
The final sentence specifically addresses itinerant apprentices and state subsidies.
To determine whether the passage supports or contradicts the statement's claim about financial subsidies given to apprentices.
2
Compare the statement's claim against the explicit passage details.
The statement asserts that apprentices received subsidies, while the text explicitly notes they 'were excluded from state financial subsidies.'
Evaluating a negative factual statement requires identifying direct textual contradictions or unsupported assertions.

Anahtar Kavram

Negative Factual Detail Verification
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla