Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaCircular Reasoning and Begging the Question

Council Member: The proposed city ordinance requiring developers to allocate 15 percent of new residential land to municipal green space will inevitably improve overall community public health. We can be certain that dedicated urban parkland enhances resident health because any residential development that incorporates designated green spaces inherently produces superior public health outcomes.

Which of the following best describes the flaw in the council member's reasoning?

  1. It supports its conclusion about public health benefits by offering a premise that merely restates that conclusion in different terms.Cevap
  2. B
    It mistakes an intermediate statement regarding land allocation for the argument's main conclusion.
  3. C
    It draws an unwarranted extrapolation about future health trends from a small, unrepresentative sample of developers.
  4. D
    It presumes without justification that a correlation between green space and resident exercise proves a direct causal relationship.
  5. E
    It treats a condition that is necessary for improving community health as though it were sufficient to guarantee that outcome.

Cevap

The argument commits the flaw of circular reasoning because its premise offers no independent evidence, simply rephrasing the main conclusion.
The correct answer accurately describes the flaw of begging the question (circular reasoning). The council member attempts to justify the claim that green space allocation will improve public health by stating as a premise that green space development inherently produces superior public health outcomes. Because the premise is merely a rephrasing of the conclusion, the argument offers no independent evidence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
Main Conclusion: The proposed ordinance requiring 15% green space will improve community public health.
Understanding the ultimate claim being made is necessary before evaluating its support.
2
Identify the evidence (premise) offered in support of the main conclusion.
Premise: Dedicated urban parkland enhances resident health because residential green spaces inherently produce superior public health outcomes.
Evaluating the support mechanism reveals how the speaker attempts to prove the claim.
3
Analyze the relationship between the premise and the conclusion.
The premise does not provide external evidence, data, or logical explanation; it assumes that green spaces inherently improve health, which is the exact claim requiring proof.
This logical structure is the classic definition of begging the question or circular reasoning.

Anahtar Kavram

Circular Reasoning and Begging the Question
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Circular Reasoning and Begging the Question

Bu konudan daha fazla soru