Consider the following argument:
To reduce carbon emissions from commuter travel, the city council recently subsidized monthly public transit passes for residents. Since the subsidies were introduced, total sales of public transit passes have increased by 25 percent. Therefore, the subsidy program has successfully reduced carbon emissions from commuter travel in the city.
True or False: In the argument above, the statement 'total sales of public transit passes have increased by 25 percent' functions as a premise supporting the main conclusion.
Cevap: Cevap
Cevap
True. The statement functions as a premise because it provides empirical evidence used to support the author's main conclusion.
The statement 'total sales of public transit passes have increased by 25 percent' provides the empirical backing that the author uses to argue for the success of the subsidy program. Because it offers evidence in support of the conclusion, it functions as a premise.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Identifying Premises and Evidence