Soru

Zorluk: OrtaNegative Factual and EXCEPT Questions

Passage:
In the mid-nineteenth century, the restructuring of maritime insurance by Lloyd's Register transformed transatlantic merchant shipping. Prior to this period, underwriters relied primarily on subjective assessments of vessel captains rather than standardized metrics of vessel seaworthiness. By instituting systematic hull inspections and classifying ships based on hull composition, timber age, and structural repairs, Lloyd’s established an objective risk-rating scheme. This categorization dictated differential insurance premiums, effectively penalizing shipowners who neglected vessel maintenance. Consequently, merchant fleets underwent rapid modernization, as older wooden vessels were systematically refitted or phased out in favor of iron-hulled ships. However, economic historians note that this transition was not without market distortions. Because classification criteria heavily favored specific shipbuilding materials abundant in British yards, foreign shipbuilders faced severe financial disadvantages when seeking coverage from London underwriters. Furthermore, while the registry incentivized physical structural safety, it entirely disregarded crew competency and navigation technology—factors that contemporary marine logs suggest contributed equally to shipwrecks. As a result, shipowners often invested heavily in structural compliance while ignoring navigational training, producing a paradoxical era where structurally sound ships continued to flounder due to preventable human error.

According to the passage, which of the following was NOT a characteristic or outcome of the risk-rating system introduced by Lloyd's Register?

  1. It prompted shipowners to prioritize navigational training and crew competency over structural repairs.Cevap
  2. B
    It replaced subjective evaluations of ship captains with standardized criteria regarding vessel seaworthiness.
  3. C
    It created financial incentives that encouraged shipowners to refit older wooden vessels or adopt iron hulls.
  4. D
    It disproportionately disadvantaged foreign shipbuilders who lacked access to preferred shipbuilding materials.
  5. E
    It omitted evaluations of non-structural contributors to maritime safety, such as navigation technology.

Cevap

The statement that the rating system prompted shipowners to prioritize navigational training over structural repairs is contradicted by the passage.
The correct option states that shipowners prioritized navigational training and crew competency over structural repairs. The passage explicitly contradicts this, noting that shipowners invested heavily in structural compliance while ignoring navigational training.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the question type and core objective.
This is a Negative Factual / EXCEPT question. The objective is to locate four options supported by the text and select the one option that is NOT supported or directly contradicted.
EXCEPT questions require verifying facts against the text to find the incorrect statement.
2
Scan the passage for textual support for each option.
The text confirms: objective criteria replaced subjective captain assessments; differential premiums encouraged refitting or adopting iron hulls; foreign builders faced financial disadvantages due to material bias; and navigation technology was disregarded.
Eliminate choices that are explicitly affirmed by the passage details.
3
Compare the remaining option against the text.
The text states that shipowners invested heavily in structural compliance while 'ignoring navigational training.' Therefore, claiming that shipowners prioritized navigational training contradicts the text.
Direct contradiction makes this option the correct response for a negative factual prompt.

Anahtar Kavram

Negative Factual and EXCEPT Questions
Bu soruyu puanla