Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaWeakening Arguments

To combat declining municipal revenues from downtown parking meters, the city council of Elmridge plans to eliminate the two-hour parking limit on all downtown streets. Council members argue that allowing drivers to park indefinitely will encourage visitors to spend more time dining and shopping in the downtown district, thereby increasing local business sales and boosting the city's sales tax revenues.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the city council's argument?

  1. Eliminating time limits causes downtown office commuters to occupy parking spaces early in the morning for full workdays, drastically reducing space availability for shoppers and diners.Cevap
  2. B
    A recent survey of downtown shoppers indicated that over seventy percent of respondents cited fear of receiving a parking ticket as their main reason for cutting trips short.
  3. C
    Neighboring municipalities that recently increased their parking violation fines experienced a fifteen percent decrease in overall downtown vehicle traffic.
  4. D
    Sales tax rates in Elmridge are slightly higher than those in surrounding suburban commercial shopping centers.
  5. E
    A clear majority of downtown retail merchants currently favor the city council's proposed parking modification.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by the finding that removing parking time limits will cause full-day office commuters to occupy downtown parking spaces early in the morning, thereby reducing space availability for shoppers and diners throughout the day.
The correct answer weakens the argument by demonstrating an unintended side effect of the plan: full-day office commuters will park early and occupy downtown spaces all day. This severely reduces parking availability for retail customers and diners, neutralizing the intended revenue increase.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the core argument
Premise: Eliminating the 2-hour parking limit allows drivers to park indefinitely. Conclusion: Visitors will stay longer to shop/dine, raising local business sales and city sales tax revenues.
Identifying the link between the plan (removing time limits) and the intended outcome (increased shopper visits and revenue) is essential to finding the unstated assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The argument assumes that shoppers and diners will be the primary beneficiaries of open-ended parking and will find available spaces easily.
A plan-to-goal argument relies on the assumption that the implementation will operate as intended without creating obstacles that defeat the goal.
3
Evaluate the impact of new evidence
If commuters occupy the spaces all day before shoppers arrive, overall customer turnover drops and shoppers cannot park downtown.
Introducing an alternative user group (commuters monopolizing spaces) invalidates the key assumption and demonstrates that the plan will decrease shopper access, directly undermining the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Arguments - Plan Implementation and Unintended Consequences
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Weakening Arguments

Bu konudan daha fazla soru