Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaEvaluating Argument Support and Weakening Across Tabs

Tab 1: Executive Proposal (Municipal Health Board)
Dr. Vance, the Municipal Health Director, proposes deploying mobile dental clinics to District 4 to reduce late-stage periodontal disease by 25% over two years. Dr. Vance argues that the primary barrier preventing residents from receiving early preventive care is physical distance and limited public transit access to fixed-location clinics.

Tab 2: Field Survey & Pilot Data
A recent health survey in District 4 revealed that 81% of uninsured residents cite out-of-pocket cost as their primary reason for missing routine dental care, whereas only 11% cite transportation or physical distance. Additionally, in neighboring District 3, a mobile clinic pilot program provided free consultations for six months and recorded a 30% increase in early preventive visits. However, when a $15 copay was introduced in the second half of the year, participation dropped by 72% despite mobile clinics remaining in the exact same accessible locations.

Statement:
The outcome of the District 3 pilot program after the introduction of the copay supports Dr. Vance’s premise that physical distance is the primary factor limiting early dental care in District 4.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

False. The sharp decline in participation following the introduction of the copay demonstrates that cost, rather than physical location, is the primary factor influencing clinic attendance. This evidence weakens, rather than supports, Dr. Vance's core premise.
Evaluating the statement as False is correct. In Tab 2, the District 3 pilot data shows a 72% drop in visits when a $15 copay was charged, even though the mobile clinics did not change location. This demonstrates that financial cost, not geographical proximity, was the primary factor dictating patient behavior, directly contradicting Dr. Vance's premise in Tab 1.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's core premise in Tab 1.
Dr. Vance claims that physical distance and transit access are the primary barriers to early preventive dental care.
Evaluating whether evidence supports or weakens an argument requires clearly isolating the claim being tested.
2
Analyze the empirical evidence from Tab 2.
In District 4, 81% cite out-of-pocket costs vs. 11% citing distance. In District 3, attendance fell by 72% when a $15 copay was added, even though clinic locations did not change.
Cross-tab synthesis requires comparing stated claims against observational or experimental data.
3
Determine the logical impact of the District 3 copay data on Dr. Vance's claim.
Because attendance collapsed solely due to price changes while location remained fixed, cost is shown to be the primary driver of patient utilization. This contradicts the premise that physical distance is the primary barrier.
A finding that identifies an alternative variable as the true primary driver weakens the claim that physical distance is the main obstacle.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Argument Support and Weakening Across Tabs
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Evaluating Argument Support and Weakening Across Tabs

Bu konudan daha fazla soru