Match each argument excerpt from a debate on public policy and industry regulation with the logical flaw archetype (Straw Man distortion or Ad Hominem attack) it primarily exhibits.
- Representative Vance suggests increasing the municipal library's operating budget by 5%. However, if we bankrupt our city by spending all public revenue on books, emergency services will fail. Thus, Vance's proposal must be rejected.Straw Man: Exaggerating a modest policy adjustment into an extreme, absurd position to make it appear unfeasible.
- Dr. Aris argues that carbon emissions tax credits encourage green innovation. We should ignore her research because she receives grant funding from an alternative energy lobbying group and stands to benefit financially.Ad Hominem: Rejecting an argument by attacking the speaker's motives and financial affiliations rather than addressing the empirical evidence.
- The chief technology officer proposed phasing out legacy database systems over three years. Critics responded that abandoning all digital infrastructure overnight would cause catastrophic data loss, proving the CTO's plan is unworkable.Straw Man: Misrepresenting a structured, multi-phase transition as an immediate, reckless action to easily discredit it.
- The economist's empirical analysis demonstrates that tariffs will raise consumer prices. But given that he was previously dismissed from a government advisory panel for personal misconduct, his economic models cannot be trusted.Ad Hominem: Dismissing logical findings by focusing on the proponent's past personal record rather than the validity of the analysis.
Cevap
The budget argument matches the Straw Man flaw of extreme exaggeration; the carbon credit argument matches the Ad Hominem flaw of attacking financial motives; the technology plan argument matches the Straw Man flaw of misrepresenting a gradual plan as immediate action; and the tariff analysis argument matches the Ad Hominem flaw of targeting past personal misconduct.
Each excerpt is correctly paired based on whether the counterargument reframes the proposal itself or attacks the individual presenting it. The library budget and CTO proposals both distort the scope or timeline of the original claims to create easily falsified caricatures (Straw Man). Conversely, the carbon credit and tariff arguments dismiss empirical claims by targeting the researchers' financial affiliations and past conduct (Ad Hominem).
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Identifying critical reasoning flaws: Straw Man distorts an opposing position to make it easier to defeat, while Ad Hominem attacks the speaker's background, motives, or character instead of evaluating the logical argument.