Soru

Zorluk: OrtaIdentifying Counterarguments and Opposing Positions

To alleviate chronic water scarcity in arid agricultural regions, several regional authorities have introduced market-based water rights trading. Proponents contend that allowing farmers to sell unused allocations incentivizes water conservation and directs resources to high-value industrial uses. However, critics argue that unrestricted trading leads to 'water farming,' where investors purchase land purely to extract and export groundwater, permanently depleting local aquifers and undermining rural economies. Nonetheless, proponents maintain that proper regulatory caps on transfer volumes can prevent over-extraction while preserving economic efficiency.

In the argument above, the statement that unrestricted trading leads to 'water farming' functions in which of the following ways?

  1. It introduces a counterargument that highlights a key drawback of unregulated trading, which the argument subsequently addresses with a proposed qualification.Cevap
  2. B
    It represents the main conclusion of the passage regarding the ultimate failure of agricultural water rights markets.
  3. C
    It provides empirical evidence offered by the author to support the claim that water trading incentivizes conservation.
  4. D
    It reflects the author's own stance that all market-based water rights trading programs should be immediately abolished.
  5. E
    It serves as an un-rebutted factual premise demonstrating why regulatory caps are impossible to enforce.

Cevap

The statement functions as a counterargument highlighting a potential flaw of unrestricted trading, which the argument later addresses by mentioning regulatory caps.
The claim that unrestricted trading leads to 'water farming' is introduced by the contrastive transition 'However' and attributed to 'critics'. This clearly marks it as an opposing position (counterargument) to the proponents' opening argument. The passage then follows with 'Nonetheless,' where proponents address this objection by asserting that regulatory caps can prevent over-extraction. Therefore, the statement functions as a counterargument raising a vulnerability that the argument subsequently attempts to resolve.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage structure and transition indicators
The passage starts with a proposal (water rights trading) supported by proponents. The pivot word 'However' introduces critics who object via the 'water farming' claim. The pivot 'Nonetheless' follows with a counter-response regarding regulatory caps.
Tracking pivot words reveals shifts between supporting arguments, counterarguments, and rebuttals.
2
Identify the stance and role of the target claim
The statement about 'water farming' is attributed to critics arguing against unrestricted trading. It serves as an opposing position to the proponents' initial positive claim.
Determining who makes the claim establishes whether it is a premise, main conclusion, or counterargument.
3
Evaluate how the subsequent text relates to the target claim
The final sentence ('Nonetheless, proponents maintain...') offers a way to mitigate the 'water farming' problem using regulatory caps.
Understanding the context following a counterargument clarifies whether the argument accepts, refutes, or qualifies the counterargument.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Counterarguments and Opposing Positions
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Bu soruyu puanla