A winery recently released thousands of beneficial predatory beetles into its vineyards to combat vine mites, which damage grape crops. At the end of the harvest season, the winery reported a 20 percent increase in usable grape yield compared to the previous year. The vineyard manager concluded that introducing the predatory beetles was the primary reason for the increased crop yield.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the vineyard manager's conclusion?
- Vineyards in the same immediate region that did not introduce predatory beetles experienced no increase in grape yield over the same period.Cevap
- BWeather conditions during the recent harvest season were exceptionally favorable for grape growth compared to the previous year.
- CPredatory beetles are generally more expensive to purchase and release than standard chemical pesticides.
- DThe winery plans to expand its distribution of organic wine to several international markets next year.
- EVine mites are known to cause severe damage to both grape leaves and the stems of grape clusters.
Cevap
Vineyards in the same immediate region that did not introduce predatory beetles experienced no increase in grape yield over the same period.
The argument attributes the 20 percent yield increase specifically to the introduction of predatory beetles. The correct response strengthens this causal claim by providing a control group: neighboring vineyards under similar environmental conditions that did not use beetles saw no increase in yield. This eliminates general regional factors (like weather or rainfall) as alternative causes, making it much more likely that the beetles caused the increase.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Strengthening Causal Arguments via Control Groups