Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorIdentifying Must-Be-True Statements and Valid Deductions

Consider the following principles established by a marine bioarchaeology research consortium:

1. Every wooden artifact recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit that displays under 5%5\% cellulose degradation is classified as a Type-A Preserved artifact.
2. No artifact classified as Type-A Preserved is ever treated with polymer sealant X, because polymer sealant X is applied exclusively to timber that has sustained structural cell-wall collapse.
3. Any wooden artifact displaying under 5%5\% cellulose degradation that was submerged for over 400400 years has sustained structural cell-wall collapse unless it was deposited in anaerobic silt prior to 15001500 CE.

Statement: Based strictly on the principles above, a wooden artifact submerged for 600600 years that displays under 5%5\% cellulose degradation and has been treated with polymer sealant X was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit in which it was placed prior to 15001500 CE.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

The statement is True because the artifact's treatment with polymer sealant X logically guarantees that it was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit.
The statement is logically valid and must be true based on the provided premises. Principle 2 establishes that no Type-A Preserved artifact is treated with polymer sealant X. Consequently, any artifact treated with polymer sealant X cannot be a Type-A Preserved artifact. Principle 1 specifies that a Type-A Preserved artifact is any artifact that both comes from an anaerobic silt deposit and displays under 5% cellulose degradation. Because the artifact in question displays under 5% cellulose degradation yet is not a Type-A Preserved artifact, it must fail the location condition—meaning it was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit. If it was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit, it logically must not have been recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit in which it was placed prior to 1500 CE.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the relationship between polymer sealant X and the Type-A Preserved classification.
By Principle 2, no Type-A Preserved artifact is treated with polymer sealant X. Therefore, an artifact treated with polymer sealant X is NOT a Type-A Preserved artifact.
Direct modus tollens application on Principle 2.
2
Evaluate the criteria for Type-A Preserved classification using Principle 1.
Type-A Preserved requires two conditions: (A) Recovery from an anaerobic silt deposit, and (B) Displaying under 5% cellulose degradation. Since the artifact displays under 5% degradation but is NOT Type-A Preserved, it must fail condition A.
If (A and B) implies C, and we have B and NOT C, then NOT A must be true.
3
Synthesize the deduction regarding recovery location and historical timing.
Since the artifact was not recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit at all, it cannot have been recovered from an anaerobic silt deposit in which it was placed prior to 1500 CE.
Logical set containment: failing the general condition automatically falsifies any specific subset of that condition.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Logic and Contrapositive Chains
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Identifying Must-Be-True Statements and Valid Deductions

Bu konudan daha fazla soru