Soru

Zorluk: OrtaStrengthening Arguments

Urban planners in Metroville recently proposed planting deep-rooted oak trees along city avenues to expand the tree canopy and mitigate the urban heat island effect. Critics argued that the extensive root networks would crack adjacent underground water pipes, incurring massive municipal repair costs. In response, city planners pointed out that the target avenues are lined with modern flexible polymer pipes rather than traditional brittle clay pipes, concluding that the tree-planting initiative will not lead to pipe repair costs. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the city planners' argument?

  1. Flexible polymer pipes have been shown in municipal engineering tests to bend under pressure from expanding tree roots without fracturing or leaking.Cevap
  2. B
    Expanding root systems of oak trees exude chemical compounds that gradually degrade polymer material, causing flexible pipes to rupture faster than clay pipes.
  3. C
    Traditional brittle clay pipes in older municipal districts currently account for over seventy percent of Metroville's annual water utility maintenance budget.
  4. D
    Expanding the urban tree canopy reduces ambient surface temperatures, thereby lowering municipal expenditures on seasonal air conditioning.
  5. E
    Cities that replaced brittle clay pipes with flexible polymer pipes experienced a significant drop in initial line installation costs.

Cevap

The statement that flexible polymer pipes bend under root pressure without fracturing or leaking most strengthens the argument.
The city planners defend their plan against critics by noting that the target avenues use flexible polymer pipes rather than brittle clay pipes. For this defense to hold, flexible polymer pipes must actually withstand root pressure better than clay pipes. Confirming that polymer pipes bend under root pressure without fracturing directly reinforces the planners' conclusion that pipe repair costs will be avoided.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument structure
Premise: Target avenues use flexible polymer pipes instead of brittle clay pipes. Conclusion: Planting oak trees will not cause pipe repair costs.
Identifying the premise-to-conclusion gap isolates the unstated assumption.
2
Identify the logical gap
The argument assumes that flexible polymer pipes will not crack or break when exposed to expanding oak tree roots.
Strengthening questions require finding evidence that validates key assumptions or rules out potential failure modes.
3
Evaluate the choices against the logical gap
The option confirming that polymer pipes withstand root expansion by bending without fracturing directly validates the planners' defense.
Providing empirical evidence of durability bridges the premise to the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Defenses by Validating Assumptions
Bu soruyu puanla