Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorDistinguishing Main Idea from Supporting Evidence

Read the passage below and match each cited excerpt or claim to its exact structural function within the argument.

Traditional transaction cost economics posits that firms integrate operations vertically primarily to mitigate opportunistic behavior and asset specificity risks associated with open-market transactions. According to this framework, high transaction costs justify internalizing production despite potential governance inefficiencies. However, recent empirical studies of digital technology conglomerates challenge this singular focus, demonstrating that firm boundaries are increasingly determined not by cost minimization, but by strategic resource orchestration. Proponents of the resource-based view argue that firms acquire external entities primarily to gain rapid access to non-fungible, complementary capabilities that would be path-dependent and prohibitively costly to develop internally.

To illustrate this dynamic, researchers analyzed several cross-border acquisitions in the semiconductor sector. Contrary to traditional predictions, acquiring firms frequently permitted target companies to retain substantial managerial autonomy and open-market supplier contracts, foregoing classical cost-containment synergies. Instead, the acquiring organizations prioritized cross-pollinating proprietary technological knowledge and absorbing skilled talent pools. Consequently, while transaction cost economics provides an essential baseline for understanding asset governance, it fails to fully account for how contemporary firms leverage targeted acquisitions as catalyst mechanisms for dynamic capability expansion rather than mere expense reduction.

Match each excerpt from the passage on the left to its corresponding structural function on the right:

  • Transaction cost economics fails to fully account for how contemporary firms leverage targeted acquisitions as catalyst mechanisms for dynamic capability expansion.Overarching main thesis of the passage
  • Firms acquire external entities primarily to gain rapid access to non-fungible, complementary capabilities.Core premise supporting the alternative theoretical view
  • Acquiring firms in the semiconductor sector permitted target companies to retain substantial managerial autonomy.Empirical evidence used to illustrate the author's argument
  • High transaction costs justify internalizing production despite potential governance inefficiencies.Traditional theoretical background presented as baseline context

Cevap

The main thesis claim matches the overarching main thesis; the capability access claim matches the core premise supporting the alternative view; the semiconductor autonomy observation matches the empirical evidence; and the transaction cost justification matches the traditional baseline context.
Each passage excerpt performs a distinct rhetorical role within the passage structure: the statement evaluating transaction cost theory expresses the main thesis; the statement explaining resource acquisition provides a core supporting premise for the alternative model; the observation of semiconductor acquisitions provides concrete empirical evidence; and the initial claim regarding transaction costs establishes baseline context.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary purpose and overarching thesis of the passage.
The final sentence of the passage synthesizes the author's ultimate claim: traditional transaction cost economics is incomplete because modern acquisitions prioritize dynamic capability expansion.
Structural synthesis of the author's position appears at the conclusion of the argument.
2
Differentiate theoretical premises from empirical evidence.
The claim regarding resource acquisition outlines the theoretical mechanism of the resource-based view, while the specific observation regarding semiconductor sector autonomy serves as real-world evidence testing that theoretical mechanism.
Abstract principles function as theoretical premises, whereas specific case observations function as empirical evidence.
3
Identify the baseline context and contrasting framework.
The assertion that high transaction costs justify internalizing production describes the traditional view presented at the beginning of the passage to establish baseline context before the structural pivot.
The passage opens by establishing classical theory before introducing modern challenges.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing Main Thesis from Supporting Evidence and Baseline Context
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Distinguishing Main Idea from Supporting Evidence