Soru

Zorluk: OrtaMulti-Sentence Synthesis Inferences

Passage:
In the mid-twentieth century, major European pharmaceutical companies funded basic research primarily through profits generated from legacy chemical patents. By the late 1960s, however, escalating regulatory standards lengthened the average clinical trial duration by nearly 50 percent, severely diminishing the net present value of newly filed patents. In response, corporate leadership shifted capital allocation toward acquiring nimble biotechnological startups rather than expanding in-house discovery labs. Concurrently, public universities began retaining intellectual property rights on federally funded discovery research, creating a robust secondary licensing market. Consequently, established pharmaceutical firms increasingly relied on university-derived patents for early-stage candidates, reserving their own internal resources almost exclusively for late-stage clinical trials and global distribution logistics.

Statement:
Based on the passage, the shift of internal resources in established pharmaceutical firms toward late-stage clinical trials was influenced by lengthened clinical trial durations that eroded the value of new patents.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

True
The statement is correct because it draws a valid logical deduction by combining evidence from sentences 2, 3, and 5. Sentence 2 establishes that regulatory changes lengthened clinical trials and reduced patent value. Sentence 3 explicitly states that firms shifted capital allocation 'in response' to this change, and sentence 5 confirms that 'consequently' firms reserved their internal resources almost exclusively for late-stage clinical trials.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the cause stated in the earlier part of the passage regarding trial duration and patent value.
The second sentence shows that escalating regulatory standards lengthened clinical trial durations by nearly 50 percent, reducing the net present value of newly filed patents.
This establishes the initial economic pressure on in-house research.
2
Trace the structural pivots and corporate responses across subsequent sentences.
The third sentence shows that firms responded by shifting capital away from expanding discovery labs, and the final sentence explains that as a result ('consequently'), internal resources were reserved almost exclusively for late-stage clinical trials.
Synthesizing these points reveals a direct logical line from extended trial timelines/eroded patent value to the reallocation of internal resources.
3
Compare the synthesized passage logic to the provided statement.
The statement asserts a valid cause-and-effect relationship supported by combining non-contiguous sentences in the text.
Because the passage explicitly links these events using causal transitions ('In response', 'Consequently'), the statement is definitively True.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-Sentence Synthesis Inferences
Bu soruyu puanla