Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorMulti-Sentence Synthesis Inferences

Passage:

In mid-nineteenth-century British industrial cities, municipal water supply networks were initially constructed by private utility companies operating under parliamentary charters. Proponents argued that private enterprise offered the capital efficiency needed to expand infrastructure rapidly. However, because private charters guaranteed monopoly rights within designated districts without capping subscriber tariffs, companies consistently prioritized high-density, affluent commercial corridors while neglecting lower-income residential perimeters. Consequently, water contamination and cholera outbreaks remained concentrated in marginalized districts throughout the 1840s.

To address these public health crises, municipal reform coalitions successfully lobbied for the Public Health Act of 1848, which authorized local boards of health to purchase private waterworks through compulsory municipalization. Surprisingly, despite acquiring the private networks, municipal boards did not immediately extend infrastructure to peripheral neighborhoods. Instead, faced with substantial debt obligations incurred from compensating former charter holders at premium valuations, these municipal boards funneled nearly all municipal revenues into servicing interest payments and maintaining existing trunk lines. Thus, counter to the expectations of reform coalitions who assumed municipalization would democratize access, the immediate financial burden of buyout compensation effectively constrained the public sector's ability to achieve broader spatial distribution of clean water until late-stage debt restructuring occurred decades later.

Based on the passage, which of the following statements regarding water infrastructure in mid-nineteenth-century British industrial cities is most strongly supported?

  1. A
    Reform coalitions maintained that private utility companies lacked the capital efficiency required for rapid infrastructure expansion.
  2. B
    Private water utility companies avoided extending infrastructure to lower-income residential districts primarily because municipal regulations capped subscriber tariffs.
  3. The financial terms under which private waterworks were transferred to public ownership prolonged the spatial disparities in infrastructure coverage initially established under private charters.Cevap
  4. D
    Late-stage debt restructuring ultimately enabled municipal boards of health to eliminate cholera outbreaks in peripheral neighborhoods permanently.
  5. E
    The Public Health Act of 1848 failed to empower local boards of health to acquire private waterworks infrastructure.

Cevap

The correct inference is that the financial terms under which private waterworks were transferred to public ownership prolonged the spatial disparities in infrastructure coverage initially established under private charters.
The correct answer correctly connects facts across both paragraphs. Paragraph 1 establishes that private utility charters produced spatial disparities by focusing water lines on affluent areas and neglecting low-income perimeters. Paragraph 2 explains that when municipal boards acquired these utilities, the high valuation compensation created debt servicing costs that prevented the expansion of pipelines to peripheral areas. Thus, the buyout financial terms prolonged the geographic disparities originally caused by private charter terms.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the evidence in paragraph 1 regarding initial infrastructure disparities.
Uncapped subscriber tariffs under private charters caused utility companies to focus infrastructure on affluent corridors and neglect low-income residential perimeters.
Establishes the origin of spatial disparities in clean water access under private ownership.
2
Analyze the evidence in paragraph 2 regarding municipal buyout consequences.
Public boards acquired private waterworks but incurred massive debt from compensating former owners at premium valuations, forcing them to service debt rather than extend water lines to peripheral neighborhoods.
Identifies why public ownership failed to resolve the geographical inequality immediately.
3
Synthesize the non-contiguous premises from Step 1 and Step 2.
The financial cost of buying out private charters (P2) directly continued the spatial neglect of peripheral/low-income districts that began under private charter terms (P1).
Combines multi-sentence evidence to form a valid, supported inference.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-Sentence Synthesis Inferences
Bu soruyu puanla