Read the argument below and match each statement to its logical role within the argument.
Argument: A pharmaceutical company recently introduced a new drug designed to treat migraines. Although early clinical trials indicated high efficacy, several recent independent studies revealed significant side effects in long-term users. Therefore, health authorities ought to suspend approval of this medication until comprehensive safety trials are completed.
- Health authorities ought to suspend approval of this medication until comprehensive safety trials are completed.Main Conclusion / Final Claim
- Several recent independent studies revealed significant side effects in long-term users.Premise / Supporting Evidence
- Early clinical trials indicated high efficacy.Concession / Counterargument Context
Cevap
The statement regarding suspending approval matches 'Main Conclusion / Final Claim', the statement regarding side effects matches 'Premise / Supporting Evidence', and the statement regarding early clinical trial efficacy matches 'Concession / Counterargument Context'.
The claim advocating that health authorities suspend drug approval is the ultimate takeaway of the passage, directly supported by evidence of long-term side effects and signaled by 'Therefore'. The statement about side effects provides the necessary empirical reason for this action, and the statement regarding early efficacy is an acknowledged concession.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Identifying Main Conclusions and Final Claims