Tüm alıştırma soruları

2195 soru

Soru 1981Soru

Many art conservators have long claimed that a recently uncovered landscape painting attributed to an 18th-century master must be an authentic early work because its canvas weaving matches techniques unique to that period. However, recent spectroscopic analysis revealed trace quantities of a synthetic blue pigment—one that was not commercially synthesized until the mid-19th century—embedded within the foundational primer layers of the canvas. This finding demonstrates that the artwork could not have been executed during the era to which it was originally attributed. Therefore, museum curators ought to remove the painting from the upcoming Renaissance exhibition and reclassify it as a later derivative.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a position that the argument seeks to discredit; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports the argument’s main conclusion.

Cevap

The first statement is a position that the argument seeks to discredit, while the second is an intermediate conclusion supporting the argument's main conclusion.
The correct answer accurately distinguishes between the competing position and the author's internal argument structure. The first bolded selection is a position held by art conservators regarding the painting's authenticity, which the author's argument set out to refute using new chemical findings. The second bolded selection is a logical deduction drawn directly from the spectroscopic evidence (an intermediate conclusion) that serves as the immediate foundation for the author's final recommendation (the main conclusion).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's main conclusion.
The main conclusion is stated in the final sentence: museum curators should remove and reclassify the painting.
Locating the ultimate point of the argument provides the benchmark against which all other statements are evaluated.
2
Determine the role of the first bolded statement.
The statement represents a view held by conservators ('must be an authentic early work') that the author subsequently refutes using chemical evidence.
Because the author argues against this claim, it functions as an opposing position that the argument seeks to discredit.
3
Determine the role of the second bolded statement.
The statement ('This finding demonstrates that the artwork could not have been executed during the era...') is a sub-conclusion drawn from the spectroscopic evidence.
It acts as a step in the author's logic, supporting the final recommendation to remove and reclassify the painting, making it an intermediate conclusion.
4
Compare findings to answer choices.
The choice stating that the first is a position the argument seeks to discredit and the second is an intermediate conclusion supporting the main conclusion matches the analysis.
This option accurately captures both structural roles without misidentifying perspective or argument hierarchy.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Bolded Statement Roles
Soru 1982Soru

Two automated cargo vessels, Vessel X and Vessel Y, transported grain along a straight route of 12001{}200 nautical miles from Port A to Port B at constant speeds of vxv_x and vyv_y knots, respectively. What was the average speed vxv_x, in knots, of Vessel X for the trip?

(1) Vessel X completed the trip in 20%20\% less time than Vessel Y.
(2) If Vessel X had traveled at a speed 1010 knots faster, it would have completed the trip in 1010 hours less time.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
The choice stating that Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient is correct. Statement (1) provides only a relative ratio between the speeds of Vessel X and Vessel Y (vy=0.8vxv_y = 0.8v_x), leaving infinitely many possible values for vxv_x. Statement (2) sets up the equation 1200vx1200vx+10=10\frac{1{}200}{v_x} - \frac{1{}200}{v_x + 10} = 10, which reduces to the quadratic equation vx2+10vx1200=0v_x^2 + 10v_x - 1{}200 = 0. Because speed must be positive, vx=30v_x = 30 is the unique solution.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the question stem target
The target is to find the exact numerical value of vx=1200Txv_x = \frac{1{}200}{T_x}, where TxT_x is the time in hours taken by Vessel X.
Establishing the relationship between distance, rate, and time (D=vtD = v \cdot t) clarifies what data is necessary.
2
Evaluate Statement (1) independently
Statement (1) states Tx=0.80TyT_x = 0.80 T_y, which implies 1200vx=0.80(1200vy)\frac{1{}200}{v_x} = 0.80 \left(\frac{1{}200}{v_y}\right), or vy=0.80vxv_y = 0.80 v_x.
This relationship gives the ratio of the two speeds but provides no specific numerical value for vxv_x or TxT_x. Thus, statement (1) ALONE is not sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) independently
Statement (2) gives 1200vx1200vx+10=10\frac{1{}200}{v_x} - \frac{1{}200}{v_x + 10} = 10. Dividing by 1010 yields 120vx120vx+10=1\frac{120}{v_x} - \frac{120}{v_x + 10} = 1, which simplifies to 120(10)=vx(vx+10)120(10) = v_x(v_x + 10), or vx2+10vx1200=0v_x^2 + 10 v_x - 1{}200 = 0. Factoring gives (vx+40)(vx30)=0(v_x + 40)(v_x - 30) = 0. Since speed must be positive, vx=30v_x = 30 knots.
Statement (2) yields a single valid positive value for vxv_x. Thus, statement (2) ALONE is sufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Data Sufficiency evaluation for rate problems involving algebraic equations of degree two where physical constraints eliminate non-positive roots.

Alternatif Yöntem

For statement (2), test clean factors of 12001{}200 for vx(vx+10)=1200v_x(v_x + 10) = 1{}200. Since 30×40=120030 \times 40 = 1{}200, vx=30v_x = 30 can be quickly verified without full quadratic expansion.
Tahmini Süre:1m 45s
Soru 1983Soru

To mitigate the growing hazard of space debris, a international maritime regulatory body proposed that commercial satellite operators should be mandated to equip all low-Earth orbit spacecraft with automated propulsive deorbiting modules. Opponents of this proposal argue that installing these modules substantially increases spacecraft weight and manufacturing costs, potentially threatening the financial viability of private space ventures. However, uncontrolled collisions in crowded orbits generate self-sustaining debris cascades that permanently destroy critical satellite communications corridors, resulting in global systemic costs far greater than the expense of onboard hardware. Therefore, adopting the proposed mandate is ultimately the most economically sound strategy for preserving orbital infrastructure.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a proposed policy whose merits are evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the author's final conclusion in favor of that policy.

Cevap

The first bolded portion is a proposed policy whose merits are evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to support the author's final conclusion in favor of that policy.
The first bolded portion introduces the proposed regulatory mandate whose costs and benefits are debated throughout the argument. The second bolded portion describes the catastrophic consequences of collisions, serving as essential premise evidence that supports the author's ultimate conclusion that the proposed policy is economically sound and should be adopted.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main structure of the argument.
Background/Proposal: mandate propulsive deorbiting modules. Opponents' view: modules add weight/cost. Author's rebuttal/Premise: collisions cause catastrophic permanent debris cascades. Author's main conclusion: adopting the mandate is the most economically sound strategy.
Deconstructing the argument into premises, counterarguments, and conclusions is required to identify the structural role of each part.
2
Identify the role of the first bolded portion.
The first bolded text ('commercial satellite operators should be mandated...') introduces the specific regulatory proposal under discussion.
The rest of the passage evaluates whether this proposed mandate should be adopted.
3
Identify the role of the second bolded portion.
The second bolded text ('uncontrolled collisions in crowded orbits generate self-sustaining debris cascades...') provides evidence showing the severity of non-action.
This premise directly counters the opponents' cost objection and supports the author's final conclusion that the policy should be adopted.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Bolded Statement Roles
Soru 1984Soru

The table below details 2025 annual operational metrics for eight commercial container terminals at a regional maritime port hub:

TerminalAnnual Cargo Volume (Thousand TEUs)Automated Crane Ratio (%)Average Berth Dwell Time (Hours)On-Time Vessel Clearance Rate (%)
Terminal A1,25080%18.592%
Terminal B84065%24.085%
Terminal C2,10090%14.296%
Terminal D62040%31.074%
Terminal E1,60075%21.588%
Terminal F95050%26.881%
Terminal G1,85085%16.094%
Terminal H1,10060%22.486%

Based on the table, evaluate the following claim: Exactly two of the three statements below are True.

Statement I: When the terminals are sorted in descending order by Annual Cargo Volume, the median Average Berth Dwell Time for the top 4 terminals is less than 17.017.0 hours.
Statement II: For every terminal where the Automated Crane Ratio is at least 75%75\%, the On-Time Vessel Clearance Rate is greater than 87%87\%.
Statement III: The mean Annual Cargo Volume across all 8 terminals is greater than 1,3501,350 thousand TEUs.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. Only Statement II is True (Statement I and Statement III are both False). Therefore, exactly one statement is True, making the overall claim False.
Evaluating each component statement reveals that Statement I is False (median is 17.2517.25 hours, which is not less than 17.017.0), Statement II is True (all four terminals with 75%\ge 75\% crane automation exceed 87%87\% clearance rate), and Statement III is False (mean cargo volume is 1,288.751,288.75, not greater than 1,3501,350). Because only one statement is True, the claim stating that exactly two statements are True is False.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement I by sorting terminals descending by Annual Cargo Volume and finding the median dwell time of the top 4.
Top 4 terminals by volume: Terminal C (2,1002,100), Terminal G (1,8501,850), Terminal E (1,6001,600), and Terminal A (1,2501,250). Their Average Berth Dwell Times are 14.214.2, 16.016.0, 21.521.5, and 18.518.5 hours, respectively. Ordered ascending, these values are 14.2,16.0,18.5,21.514.2, 16.0, 18.5, 21.5. The median is the average of the two middle values: 16.0+18.52=17.25\frac{16.0 + 18.5}{2} = 17.25 hours. Since 17.25>17.017.25 > 17.0, Statement I is False.
Correctly identifying the median of an even set requires ordering the values and taking the midpoint of the two central numbers.
2
Evaluate Statement II by checking the On-Time Vessel Clearance Rate for terminals with an Automated Crane Ratio 75%\ge 75\%.
Terminals with Automated Crane Ratio 75%\ge 75\% are Terminal A (80%80\%, Clearance 92%92\%), Terminal C (90%90\%, Clearance 96%96\%), Terminal E (75%75\%, Clearance 88%88\%), and Terminal G (85%85\%, Clearance 94%94\%). All four have Clearance Rates strictly greater than 87%87\%. Statement II is True.
Conditional filtering requires verifying every single row that satisfies the specified antecedent condition.
3
Evaluate Statement III by calculating the aggregate arithmetic mean of Annual Cargo Volume across all 8 terminals.
Sum of volume =1250+840+2100+620+1600+950+1850+1100=10,310= 1250 + 840 + 2100 + 620 + 1600 + 950 + 1850 + 1100 = 10,310 thousand TEUs. Mean =10,3108=1,288.75= \frac{10,310}{8} = 1,288.75 thousand TEUs. Since 1,288.75<1,3501,288.75 < 1,350, Statement III is False.
Computing aggregate mean requires dividing total cargo sum by total terminal count.
4
Synthesize the boolean values of the three statements to evaluate the claim.
Statement I = False, Statement II = True, Statement III = False. Exactly 1 statement is True. The claim asserts that exactly 2 statements are True, which is False.
Comparing the count of True statements to the claim's requirement determines the overall boolean result.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-Statement Boolean Evaluation using tabular data sorting, conditional filtering, and descriptive statistics.
Soru 1985Soru

Passage:
In 1904, astronomer Andrew Ellicott Douglass initiated the systematic study of tree-ring analysis, or dendrochronology, originally seeking a terrestrial proxy for historical solar activity cycles. Hypothesizing that sunspot fluctuations influenced regional precipitation, Douglass reasoned that annual growth rings in coniferous trees across the American Southwest would register variations in rainfall dictated by solar variability. Although subsequent atmospheric research demonstrated that local precipitation is governed by intricate meteorological dynamics rather than direct solar forcing, Douglass’s analytical framework inadvertently provided a revolutionary chronological apparatus for North American archaeology. By cross-dating living ponderosa pines with structural timbers retrieved from ancestral Puebloan settlements, Douglass constructed a continuous calendar sequence extending back over a millennium, successfully anchoring previously floating archaeological chronologies. Crucially, Douglass recognized that the validity of cross-dating depended not on absolute ring width, but on identifying identical sequences of relative ring thickness across distinct specimens exposed to identical macroclimatic conditions. Consequently, trees inhabiting low-elevation, moisture-deficient sites—classified by Douglass as 'sensitive' specimens—yielded diagnostic ring patterns far superior to those of 'complacent' trees growing in well-watered alluvial soils, whose uniform annual growth suppressed variations in interannual precipitation.

According to the passage, Douglass classified certain trees as 'sensitive' specimens because their annual growth rings:

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: displayed distinct variations in relative thickness reflecting year-to-year shifts in precipitation.

Cevap

The correct option is the one stating that sensitive trees displayed distinct variations in relative thickness reflecting year-to-year shifts in precipitation.
The correct choice accurately reflects the explicit passage statement in the final sentence, which indicates that 'sensitive' specimens grew in moisture-deficient environments and produced diagnostic ring patterns because their ring thickness varied in response to year-to-year precipitation changes.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the targeted concept in the passage.
Identified the final sentence discussing 'sensitive' specimens versus 'complacent' trees.
The question asks specifically why Douglass classified certain trees as sensitive.
2
Analyze the explicit text describing sensitive specimens.
The text states that trees in low-elevation, moisture-deficient sites ('sensitive' specimens) yielded diagnostic ring patterns superior to 'complacent' trees whose uniform growth suppressed variations in interannual precipitation.
Direct factual retrieval requires finding the semantic equivalent of the explicit passage detail.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the passage detail.
The option referring to distinct variations in relative thickness reflecting year-to-year rainfall shifts matches the explicit detail.
It paraphrases the passage statement that sensitive trees yielded diagnostic ring patterns driven by interannual precipitation variations.

Anahtar Kavram

Direct Factual Retrieval
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 1986Soru

Proponents of agroecological farming argue that transitioning from synthetic fertilizers to cover-cropping and compost application significantly boosts soil carbon sequestration, thereby mitigating climate change. Skeptics, however, contend that organic soil amendments require vastly larger land allocations to produce equivalent crop yields, leading to indirect land-use change (ILUC) that offsets local carbon gains through deforestation elsewhere. To counter this objection, recent multi-decadal studies emphasize that integrated agroecological systems optimize nutrient cycling and soil moisture retention, eventually closing the yield gap with conventional synthetic farming within five to seven harvest cycles. Furthermore, advocates highlight that carbon loss projections derived from ILUC calculations rely on static economic models that fail to account for progressive yield efficiencies achieved as regenerative soil health matures over time. Thus, advocates argue that the claim that agroecology inherently accelerates net carbon emissions through land expansion overlooks both the temporal dynamics of yield convergence and the persistent soil degradation caused by synthetic alternatives.

Which of the following best describes the logical function of the advocates' reference to 'static economic models' in the context of the passage's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It undermines a premise of the skeptics' counterargument by showing that their calculations of carbon loss rely on an inaccurate assumption about long-term crop yields.

Cevap

The reference to static economic models serves to challenge an underlying assumption of the skeptics' counterargument by demonstrating that their carbon loss projections ignore future yield improvements in agroecology.
The correct answer accurately describes the rhetorical function of the phrase. Skeptics argue that agroecology leads to indirect land-use change because of lower yields. Advocates respond by showing that the models skeptics use to predict carbon loss are 'static'—they incorrectly assume yields will remain low indefinitely, ignoring the progressive efficiency gains demonstrated over multi-decadal cycles. Thus, citing static models serves to expose a flawed assumption in the skeptics' argument.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the skeptics' counterargument and the advocates' rebuttal in the passage.
Skeptics argue that lower yields in agroecology force land expansion (ILUC), causing deforestation. Advocates rebut this by citing yield convergence and criticizing ILUC models.
Understanding the dialectic structure between the two opposing positions is necessary to evaluate the role of specific evidence.
2
Analyze the specific line context regarding 'static economic models'.
Advocates state that ILUC calculations rely on static models that fail to capture progressive yield efficiencies gained as soil health matures.
This establishes that the reference is used to expose a methodological flaw in the skeptics' carbon loss projections.
3
Match the analyzed function with the option choices.
The option stating that it undermines a premise of the skeptics' counterargument accurately reflects how pointing out model limitations refutes the skeptics' objection.
Exposing faulty assumptions in an opponent's modeling directly weakens the validity of their counterargument.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Counterarguments and Rebuttals
Soru 1987Soru

A small workshop produces two items, Item X and Item Y. Each unit of Item X requires 22 hours of labor and yields a profit of $30\$30. Each unit of Item Y requires 44 hours of labor and yields a profit of $50\$50. The workshop has a maximum of 1616 labor hours available daily and must produce a combined total of at least 55 units per day. Assuming only whole units can be produced, which combination of (Item X, Item Y) maximizes total daily profit while satisfying all given constraints?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 6 units of Item X and 1 unit of Item Y

Cevap

6 units of Item X and 1 unit of Item Y
The pair consisting of 6 units of Item X and 1 unit of Item Y uses 2(6)+4(1)=162(6) + 4(1) = 16 labor hours (satisfying the maximum 1616-hour limit) and produces 6+1=76 + 1 = 7 units (satisfying the minimum 55-unit limit). It yields a profit of 30(6)+50(1)=$23030(6) + 50(1) = \$230, which is higher than all other feasible options.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formulate the constraint inequalities and profit objective function.
Labor constraint: 2X+4Y162X + 4Y \le 16. Minimum unit constraint: X+Y5X + Y \ge 5, where X,Y0X, Y \ge 0 are integers. Profit function: P=30X+50YP = 30X + 50Y.
Setting up the mathematical relations allows systematic evaluation of candidate pairs.
2
Evaluate feasible integer combinations (X,Y)(X, Y) against both constraints.
Combination (6,1)(6, 1): Labor =1616= 16 \le 16, Units =75= 7 \ge 5. Profit =30(6)+50(1)=$230= 30(6) + 50(1) = \$230.
Combination (4,2)(4, 2): Labor =1616= 16 \le 16, Units =65= 6 \ge 5. Profit =30(4)+50(2)=$220= 30(4) + 50(2) = \$220.
Combination (2,3)(2, 3): Labor =1616= 16 \le 16, Units =55= 5 \ge 5. Profit =30(2)+50(3)=$210= 30(2) + 50(3) = \$210.
Evaluating all valid pairs determines which produces the peak profit value.
3
Compare profit outcomes across feasible pairs.
The combination of 66 units of Item X and 11 unit of Item Y achieves the highest valid profit of $230\$230.
The option (6,1)(6, 1) optimizes the objective function under all bounded constraints.

Anahtar Kavram

Optimization under linear integer and inequality bounds
Soru 1988Soru
### Tab 1: Regional Telemedicine Reimbursement Policy
- Standard Consultation Rate: Baseline reimbursement is $\$ 60 percompletedconsultation.RuralZoneIncentive:ConsultationsconductedforpatientsresidingindesignatedRuralZonesreceiveanadditional per completed consultation. - **Rural Zone Incentive**: Consultations conducted for patients residing in designated Rural Zones receive an additional \20$ surcharge per consultation (totaling $\80 perconsultation).AudioOnlyConsultationAdjustment:Audioonlyconsultationsarereimbursedat per consultation). - **Audio-Only Consultation Adjustment**: Audio-only consultations are reimbursed at 50\%oftheapplicableconsultationrate(baselineorrural),EXCEPTwhenaverifiedtechnicaloutageisloggedinTab3fortheconsultationdate,inwhichcasethefullapplicablerateisgranted.CrossStateLicensureCompliance:ConsultationsforoutofstatepatientsareeligibleforreimbursementONLYIFoutofstatepatientsconstitutenomorethan of the applicable consultation rate (baseline or rural), EXCEPT when a verified technical outage is logged in Tab 3 for the consultation date, in which case the full applicable rate is granted. - **Cross-State Licensure Compliance**: Consultations for out-of-state patients are eligible for reimbursement ONLY IF out-of-state patients constitute no more than 15\%$ of the clinic's total Q3 consultations, UNLESS a formal cross-state license waiver is listed in Tab 3.
### Tab 2: Q3 Clinic Operational Summary
Clinic NameLocation ZoneTotal Q3 ConsultationsOut-of-State Patient %Consultation Breakdown
Apex HealthUrban50012%400 Video, 100 Audio-Only
Beacon CareRural40020%300 Video, 100 Audio-Only
Crestview ClinicRural25010%200 Video, 50 Audio-Only

### Tab 3: Q3 Audit Log & Compliance Exceptions
- Beacon Care: Granted a formal cross-state license waiver valid for all Q3 consultations.
- Apex Health: Logged a verified video platform technical outage on August 12 (all 100 of Apex Health's audio-only consultations occurred on this date).
- Crestview Clinic: No technical outages logged; no licensure waivers granted.

Based on the multi-tab information provided, evaluate whether the following statement is True or False:

"Beacon Care is eligible for a total Q3 reimbursement of exactly $\$ 31,000$."

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. Beacon Care is eligible for a total Q3 reimbursement of $\$ 28,000 ,not, not \$31,00031,000.
Evaluating the statement requires synthesizing policy rules from Tab 1, operational totals from Tab 2, and compliance logs from Tab 3. Beacon Care qualifies for rural pricing ($\$ 80 perfullvisit)andisexemptedfromthecrossstatecapbyitsQ3waiver.Its300videoconsultationsgenerate per full visit) and is exempted from the cross-state cap by its Q3 waiver. Its 300 video consultations generate \24,000$. Because the verified outage in Tab 3 applied only to Apex Health, Beacon Care's 100 audio visits receive the standard $50\%$ rate reduction ($50\% \times \80 = \40$), adding $\4,000 .Theexacttotalreimbursementis. The exact total reimbursement is \28,000$, making the statement that it equals $\31,000$ false.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the applicable base reimbursement rate for Beacon Care using Tab 1 and Tab 2.
Beacon Care is located in a Rural Zone, so its rate per full consultation is $\$ 60 \text{ (standard)} + \20 \text{ (rural incentive)} = \80$.
Tab 1 specifies an additional $\$ 20$ surcharge for clinics in designated Rural Zones.
2
Evaluate cross-state licensure compliance using Tab 2 and Tab 3.
All 400 of Beacon Care's consultations remain eligible for reimbursement.
Although Beacon Care's out-of-state patient percentage is 20%20\% (exceeding the 15%15\% threshold), Tab 3 confirms Beacon Care was granted a formal cross-state license waiver for all of Q3.
3
Calculate reimbursement for Beacon Care's video consultations.
300 video consultations×$300 \text{ video consultations} \times \$ 80 = \$24,00024,000.
Video consultations receive the full applicable rural rate of $\$ 80$ per consultation.
4
Determine the reimbursement rate and total for Beacon Care's audio-only consultations using Tab 1 and Tab 3.
Audio-only rate = 50%×$50\% \times \$ 80 = \40$. Reimbursement = $100 \times \40 = \$4,0004,000.
Tab 1 dictates that audio-only visits receive 50%50\% of the applicable rate unless a technical outage is logged. Tab 3 shows that the technical outage belonged to Apex Health, not Beacon Care.
5
Sum the components to find total Q3 reimbursement and evaluate the statement.
Total Reimbursement = $\$ 24,000 + \4,000 = \28,000 .Theclaimedtotalof. The claimed total of \$31,00031,000 is incorrect.
Comparing $\$ 28,000 tothestatementsclaimof to the statement's claim of \$31,00031,000 proves the statement is False.

Anahtar Kavram

Dichotomous Choice Evaluation with Conditional Policy Exceptions Across Multiple Data Sources
Soru 1989Soru

Agricultural scientists recently proposed introducing a genetically modified species of parasitic wasp to control the population of destructive stem-borer beetles affecting regional maize crops. Opponents of the plan argue that introducing a non-native insect species could unpredictably disrupt local ecosystems. However, field trials conducted in neighboring agricultural zones demonstrated that the introduced wasp species dies off naturally within weeks once beetle populations fall below a critical threshold. Therefore, the proposed biological control plan is unlikely to cause long-term ecological damage to the region.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first presents factual evidence used to counter a potential objection to the proposed plan; the second is the main conclusion derived from that evidence.

Cevap

The first boldfaced statement presents factual evidence used to counter a potential objection to the proposed plan, while the second boldfaced statement is the main conclusion derived from that evidence.
The correct option accurately identifies the dual functions of the bolded statements: the first boldface provides empirical trial data showing that the wasps die off quickly (countering the critics' objection about long-term ecosystem disruption), and the second boldface is the main conclusion drawn by the author based on that evidence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main argument structure and identify the author's main stance.
Opponents argue the wasp will cause ecological damage. The author disagrees and argues the plan will not cause long-term damage.
Understanding the overall argument flow helps clarify which statements support or oppose the main conclusion.
2
Determine the role of the first boldfaced statement.
The statement shows that wasps die off naturally when beetles decrease, which directly addresses and mitigates the opponents' concern.
It acts as empirical evidence refuting the opponents' objection.
3
Determine the role of the second boldfaced statement.
Introduced by 'Therefore', it states the main claim that the biological control plan is unlikely to cause long-term ecological damage.
This is the primary argument/conclusion the author is advancing.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Bolded Statement Roles
Soru 1990Soru

Passage:
In the sociology of scientific knowledge, the phenomenon of 'epistemic signaling lock-in' describes a structural distortion in peer-reviewed academic literature. The process begins when an early, simplified theoretical model achieves widespread visibility—not necessarily due to its intrinsic empirical accuracy, but because its adoption provides researchers with a low-risk method to signal professional competence to journal reviewers. Because citing the established model minimizes evaluator friction, subsequent researchers routinely incorporate its assumptions into their work, even when more precise analytical frameworks exist.

As this citation pattern becomes pervasive, evaluator expectations within the discipline become calibrated strictly around the canonical framework's specific terminology and methodologies. Consequently, peer reviewers come to treat adherence to the established model as an indispensable proxy for overall research quality. Submissions introducing novel, empirically superior paradigms are frequently rejected or subjected to disproportionate scrutiny primarily because they lack these expected signaling markers. Over time, this self-reinforcing dynamic establishes a systemic barrier to entry for innovative methodologies, perpetuating an obsolete consensus purely through the operational incentives of reviewer compliance. The resulting ecosystem demonstrates how institutional evaluation mechanisms can inadvertently detach professional consensus from objective performance, anchoring a discipline to outdated practices through the path-dependent behavior of its participants.

Which of the following scenarios is most structurally analogous to the phenomenon of 'epistemic signaling lock-in' described in the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A corporate hiring department uses a legacy software certification to screen job applicants because reviewers recognize the credential. Job seekers overwhelmingly obtain this legacy certification to ensure their resumes pass initial screening, leading hiring managers to view the credential as an essential indicator of candidate ability and systematically filtering out software engineers who possess more advanced, modern programming skills.

Cevap

The scenario involving corporate hiring best mirrors epistemic signaling lock-in because an outdated credential is used for evaluator signaling, creating a self-reinforcing loop that filters out candidates with superior skills.
The correct answer isolates the structural relationship described in the passage: an evaluation standard is adopted primarily as a signaling tool, causing participants to conform to it to avoid friction. This conformity reinforces the evaluators' belief that the standard is an essential measure of quality, thereby suppressing superior alternatives. The hiring scenario mirrors this exact four-stage loop in a non-academic context.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the core structural mechanism in the passage.
The passage outlines four key stages: (1) An initial convention is adopted to signal competence to evaluators; (2) Participants adopt the convention to avoid evaluator friction; (3) Evaluators come to view the convention as a mandatory proxy for quality; (4) Empirically superior alternatives are suppressed, locking in an obsolete standard.
Mapping the abstract structural stages is necessary before evaluating parallel scenarios.
2
Evaluate the choices for structural parallel alignment.
The corporate hiring scenario matches all four stages precisely: (1) Legacy certification used for screening recognition; (2) Job seekers obtain it to pass screening; (3) Hiring managers treat it as an essential quality proxy; (4) Superior modern software engineers are filtered out.
Matching structural dynamics across completely different domains ensures valid analogical reasoning.

Anahtar Kavram

Structural Analogy in Reading Comprehension
Soru 1991Soru

In deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecosystems, chemosynthetic bacteria form the foundation of the food web by utilizing hydrogen sulfide emitted from vents to synthesize organic compounds. Higher organisms, such as giant tubeworms (Riftia pachyptila), rely entirely on symbiotic bacteria within their specialized organs for nutrition, as mature tubeworms lack a functional digestive tract. Marine biologists recently observed that during periods of volcanic quiescence, when hydrogen sulfide emissions drop dramatically, populations of Riftia pachyptila experience rapid physiological decline and high mortality within weeks. However, neighboring populations of another vent species, the bathymodiolin mussel (Bathymodiolus thermophilus), sustain stable population densities for several months under identical low-sulfide conditions.

Researchers hypothesized that B. thermophilus survives prolonged sulfide deprivation primarily because of its dual endosymbiotic capacity: it harbors both thiotrophic (sulfide-oxidizing) bacteria and methanotrophic (methane-oxidizing) bacteria. The researchers concluded that the presence of methanotrophic endosymbionts allows B. thermophilus to switch to methane as a primary energy source when sulfide availability diminishes, thereby granting the species a distinct competitive survival advantage during volcanic lulls.

Which of the following is an unstated assumption upon which the researchers' conclusion depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Methane emissions at hydrothermal vent sites do not drop to levels insufficient to support methanotrophic chemosynthesis during periods of volcanic quiescence.

Cevap

The researchers' conclusion relies on the unstated assumption that methane emissions at hydrothermal vent sites do not drop to levels insufficient to support methanotrophic chemosynthesis during periods of volcanic quiescence.
The conclusion asserts that switching to methane chemosynthesis enables bathymodiolin mussels to survive when hydrogen sulfide emissions drop during volcanic quiescence. For this mechanism to function, methane must actually be present and accessible in usable quantities when sulfide emissions decline. If methane levels also fell below the threshold required for chemosynthesis during volcanic lulls, the presence of methanotrophic bacteria would afford no survival benefit. Thus, the argument strictly requires that methane emissions remain sufficient during these periods.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's core premise and main conclusion.
Premise: B. thermophilus harbors methanotrophic bacteria and survives sulfide drops, whereas Riftia lacks methanotrophic symbionts and dies. Conclusion: The ability of methanotrophic symbionts to use methane as an energy source allows B. thermophilus to survive low-sulfide periods.
Establishing the logical gap between the observation (dual symbionts) and the conclusion (methane switching enables survival) is necessary to uncover unstated premises.
2
Apply the Negation Test to candidate assumptions.
Negating the statement regarding methane availability yields: 'Methane emissions drop to levels insufficient to support methanotrophic chemosynthesis during volcanic quiescence.'
If methane is not available in sufficient quantities during volcanic quiescence, having methanotrophic symbionts cannot explain how the mussels survive during that period.
3
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the conclusion.
The negated statement completely breaks the argument's causal mechanism.
A statement whose negation invalidates the conclusion represents a strictly necessary unstated assumption.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Unstated Assumptions in Passages
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1992Soru

### Tab 1: Spaceport Delta Launch Tariff & Fee Rules
- Base Launch Fee: $1,200,000\$1,200,000 per launch.
- Heavy-Payload Surcharge: For payloads exceeding 4,000 kg4,000\text{ kg}, an additional surcharge of $150\$150 per kg is assessed on the mass *in excess of* 4,000 kg4,000\text{ kg}.
- Bio-Propellant Exemption: If a launch vehicle uses 100% bio-derived propellant, the calculated heavy-payload surcharge is reduced by 50%50\%; the base launch fee remains unchanged.
- Night Window Operations Penalty: Any launch operating during night hours (22:0022:0006:0006:00) incurs a flat $100,000\$100,000 noise abatement penalty.

### Tab 2: Q3 Commercial Launch Manifest
Flight IDPayload Mass (kg)Propellant TypeScheduled WindowActual Window
FL-1013,500Standard Kerosene14:00 - 16:0015:30 - 16:30
FL-1025,200100% Bio-Propellant18:00 - 20:0022:30 - 23:30
FL-1034,800Standard Kerosene21:00 - 23:0021:30 - 22:30

### Tab 3: Regulatory Delay & Waiver Guidelines
- Section 4.2 (Weather Waivers): The $100,000\$100,000 night window operations penalty is waived if a launch delay into night hours is certified as weather-induced by the Atmospheric Bureau.
- Section 4.3 (Technical Failures): Delays resulting from mechanical or ground telemetry failure do not qualify for any penalty waiver.
- Official Audit Report: The Atmospheric Bureau officially certified the delay of Flight FL-102 as weather-induced. The delay of Flight FL-103 was documented as a ground telemetry system failure.

Based on the information provided in the three tabs, which of the following choices correctly identifies the truth value (Yes or No) for each of the three statements below?

- Statement 1: The total fee assessed for Flight FL-102 (including base fee and applicable surcharges/waivers) is $1,290,000\$1,290,000.
- Statement 2: Flight FL-103 is subject to a total surcharge (heavy-payload surcharge plus night window penalty) of $220,000\$220,000.
- Statement 3: Flight FL-103 incurred a total launch fee that is less than the total launch fee incurred by Flight FL-102.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement 1: Yes; Statement 2: Yes; Statement 3: No

Cevap

Statement 1: Yes; Statement 2: Yes; Statement 3: No
The correct response accurately evaluates all three statements by synthesizing data across all three tabs:
- Statement 1 (Yes): Base fee (1,200,000)+discountedheavypayloadsurcharge(1,200,000) + discounted heavy payload surcharge ( 90,000) + waived night penalty (0)=0) = 1,290,000.
- Statement 2 (Yes): Heavy payload surcharge (120,000)+nonwaivednightpenalty(120,000) + non-waived night penalty ( 100,000) = 220,000.Statement3(No):FlightFL103totalfee(220,000. - Statement 3 (No): Flight FL-103 total fee ( 1,420,000) is greater than Flight FL-102 total fee ($1,290,000), not less.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement 1 for Flight FL-102
Statement 1 is YES (Total fee = $1,290,000).
Base fee = 1,200,000.Payloadmass=5,200kg,whichexceeds4,000kgby1,200kg.Standardheavysurcharge=1,200kg1,200,000. Payload mass = 5,200 kg, which exceeds 4,000 kg by 1,200 kg. Standard heavy surcharge = 1,200 kg * 150 = 180,000.SinceFL102uses100180,000. Since FL-102 uses 100% Bio-Propellant (Tab 2), Tab 1 grants a 50% discount on the heavy surcharge ( 180,000 * 0.50 = 90,000).FL102launchedduring22:3023:30(nightwindow),incurringapotential90,000). FL-102 launched during 22:30-23:30 (night window), incurring a potential 100,000 penalty, but Tab 3 states this delay was certified as weather-induced, waiving the penalty. Total fee = 1,200,000+1,200,000 + 90,000 + 0=0 = 1,290,000.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 for Flight FL-103
Statement 2 is YES (Total surcharge = $220,000).
Payload mass = 4,800 kg, exceeding 4,000 kg by 800 kg. Heavy surcharge = 800 kg * 150=150 = 120,000. FL-103 uses Standard Kerosene (no discount). Actual window (21:30-22:30) overlaps into the night window (after 22:00), incurring a 100,000penalty.Tab3specifiesthatgroundtelemetryfailuresdonotqualifyforwaivers.Totalsurcharge=100,000 penalty. Tab 3 specifies that ground telemetry failures do not qualify for waivers. Total surcharge = 120,000 + 100,000=100,000 = 220,000.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 comparing total launch fees
Statement 3 is NO (FL-103 total fee of 1,420,000isgreaterthanFL102totalfeeof1,420,000 is greater than FL-102 total fee of 1,290,000).
Total fee FL-102 = 1,290,000.TotalfeeFL103=Base(1,290,000. Total fee FL-103 = Base ( 1,200,000) + Surcharges (220,000)=220,000) = 1,420,000. Since 1,420,000isgreaterthan1,420,000 is greater than 1,290,000, FL-103 incurred a higher fee, making the statement false.

Anahtar Kavram

Multi-source policy application combining quantitative surcharge formulas with qualitative conditional waiver rules across tabbed sources.
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Soru 1993Soru

Passage:
For decades, geobiologists attributed the deposition of Paleoproterozoic banded iron formations (BIFs)—massive sedimentary structures composed of alternating layers of iron oxides and chert—primarily to the biological activity of oxygenic photosynthetic cyanobacteria. According to the classical model, cyanobacteria generated free oxygen as a metabolic byproduct, which subsequently reacted with dissolved ferrous iron (Fe2+Fe^{2+}) in shallow oceanic waters to precipitate insoluble ferric iron (Fe3+Fe^{3+}) oxides. However, recent geochemical analyses of trace element distributions and chromium isotope fractionation have challenged this singular mechanism, suggesting that non-oxygenic photoferrotrophic bacteria played a far more substantial role than previously acknowledged. Photoferrotrophs utilize light energy to oxidize dissolved ferrous iron directly into ferric hydroxide without releasing free oxygen, operating efficiently under anoxic conditions. This alternative pathway explains how extensive BIF accumulation occurred prior to widespread atmospheric oxygenation. Furthermore, numerical modeling of ocean circulation patterns during the Paleoproterozoic indicates that deep-sea hydrothermal vents supplied a continuous flux of ferrous iron, while upwelling currents transported these ions into the photic zone where both bacterial communities flourished. Consequently, researchers now view BIF deposition not as a simple indicator of atmospheric oxygenation, but as a complex interplay between hydrothermal iron supply, microbial metabolic diversity, and dynamic oceanic circulation.

According to the passage, all of the following factors are identified as contributing to or explaining the deposition of banded iron formations EXCEPT:

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A dramatic increase in atmospheric ozone concentration that shielded surface microbial communities from ultraviolet radiation

Cevap

The statement regarding a dramatic increase in atmospheric ozone concentration that shielded surface microbial communities from ultraviolet radiation is the correct answer because it is completely unsupported and unmentioned by the passage.
The passage discusses cyanobacterial oxygen generation, photoferrotrophic metabolic pathways, hydrothermal vent fluxes, upwelling currents, and oceanic circulation. However, it makes no reference whatsoever to atmospheric ozone concentrations or ultraviolet radiation. Because this statement is entirely unmentioned, it is the correct choice for an EXCEPT question.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the question type and core objective.
Recognize that this is an EXCEPT negative factual question requiring the identification of the one option that is NOT stated or supported in the passage.
Negative factual questions ask for the statement that is missing or contradicted, while the four incorrect options will be directly supported by textual evidence.
2
Scan the passage for textual evidence verifying each answer option.
The passage explicitly supports: (1) photoferrotrophic bacteria operating under anoxic conditions, (2) upwelling of ferrous iron from hydrothermal vents into the photic zone, (3) reactions between ferrous iron and cyanobacterial free oxygen, and (4) ocean circulation patterns transporting iron ions.
Evaluating all options against specific passage details allows systematic elimination of supported facts.
3
Isolate the unsupported option.
The option discussing atmospheric ozone levels and ultraviolet protection has zero textual backing anywhere in the passage.
The option lacking passage evidence is the correct response for an EXCEPT question stem.

Anahtar Kavram

Negative Factual / EXCEPT Retrieval
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1994Soru

A renewable energy facility operates two models of solar panels: Type P and Type Q. A total of 100100 Type P panels and 200200 Type Q panels generate a combined total of 1,4001,400 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity per day. If the ratio of the daily output of a single Type P panel to that of a single Type Q panel is 3:23 : 2, which of the following represents the daily energy output per panel, in kWh, for Type P and Type Q, respectively?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 6 kWh/day6\text{ kWh/day} for Type P and 4 kWh/day4\text{ kWh/day} for Type Q

Cevap

6 kWh/day6\text{ kWh/day} for Type P and 4 kWh/day4\text{ kWh/day} for Type Q
Expressing the rates as rP=3kr_P = 3k and rQ=2kr_Q = 2k allows us to model total production as 100(3k)+200(2k)=700k=1,400100(3k) + 200(2k) = 700k = 1,400. Solving gives k=2k = 2, yielding rP=6 kWh/dayr_P = 6\text{ kWh/day} and rQ=4 kWh/dayr_Q = 4\text{ kWh/day}, which satisfies both the 3:23:2 ratio and the total output constraint.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Set up equations based on the ratio constraint.
Let rP=3kr_P = 3k and rQ=2kr_Q = 2k for some positive constant kk.
The given ratio of outputs rP:rQr_P : r_Q is 3:23 : 2.
2
Set up the total daily output equation.
100(3k)+200(2k)=1,400100(3k) + 200(2k) = 1,400
There are 100100 Type P panels and 200200 Type Q panels generating 1,400 kWh1,400\text{ kWh} in total.
3
Solve for the multiplier kk.
300k+400k=1,400    700k=1,400    k=2300k + 400k = 1,400 \implies 700k = 1,400 \implies k = 2
Combine like terms and divide by 700700.
4
Calculate the individual panel outputs.
Type P rate rP=3(2)=6 kWh/dayr_P = 3(2) = 6\text{ kWh/day}; Type Q rate rQ=2(2)=4 kWh/dayr_Q = 2(2) = 4\text{ kWh/day}.
Substitute k=2k = 2 back into the expressions for rPr_P and rQr_Q.

Anahtar Kavram

Work Rates and Ratios
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 1995Soru

Consider the following passage:

Planetary scientists long posited that complex organic molecules discovered on comets originated strictly within interstellar cold clouds prior to the formation of the presolar nebula. Critics of this interstellar origin hypothesis countered that solar ultraviolet irradiation during the early protoplanetary disk phase was sufficient to synthesize these organic compounds in situ from simpler volatile ice species. To support their counterargument, these critics pointed to laboratory simulations in which volatile ice mixtures subjected to disk-level UV exposure yielded complex amino acid precursors identical to those retrieved from cometary samples.

However, astrochemists recently offered a rebuttal to this in situ synthesis argument by analyzing deuterium-to-hydrogen (D/H) isotopic ratios within cometary organic matter. Their measurements revealed an extreme deuterium enrichment that chemically requires formation temperatures consistently below 20 Kelvin. Because thermodynamic modeling demonstrates that even the outermost regions of the protoplanetary disk maintained temperatures well above 40 Kelvin during the period of peak solar UV flux, the astrochemists argued that in situ disk synthesis cannot account for the observed isotopic profile.

Evaluate the following statement based on the passage:

The astrochemists' rebuttal successfully neutralizes the in situ disk synthesis counterargument by demonstrating that a thermodynamic condition required for the cometary organics' isotopic signature was absent during the protoplanetary disk phase.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is True. The astrochemists invalidate the counterargument by showing that the specific isotopic signature (D/H ratio) requires temperatures below 20 K, which did not exist during the protoplanetary disk phase.
The passage explicitly establishes that the observed D/H ratio requires temperatures under 20 K. It then notes that disk temperatures during the UV irradiation period were above 40 K. Showing that a required condition (<20 K) was unfulfilled during the proposed process (in situ disk synthesis) invalidates that process as an explanation for the cometary data, confirming the statement as true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the primary thesis and the counterargument
Thesis: Cometary organics originated in pre-solar interstellar cold clouds. Counterargument: Organics were synthesized in situ within the protoplanetary disk via UV irradiation.
Understanding the opposing viewpoints is necessary to analyze the function of the rebuttal.
2
Analyze the evidence and premise of the astrochemists' rebuttal
Rebuttal premise: D/H isotopic ratio requires temperatures below 20 K. Disk premise: Disk temperatures remained above 40 K during UV irradiation.
Connecting the physical constraints establishes whether the rebuttal logically addresses the counterargument's mechanism.
3
Evaluate whether the rebuttal neutralizes the counterargument
Since in situ synthesis cannot explain the <20 K isotopic constraint, the counterargument fails to account for the physical evidence, neutralizing its challenge to the main thesis.
Evaluating logical sufficiency confirms that the statement accurately describes the rebuttal's impact.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating the logical validity and scope of a scientific rebuttal against an opposing counterargument
Soru 1996Soru

In evolutionary acoustics, "cascade signal displacement" refers to an adaptive sequence triggered when sympatric animal species compete for limited bandwidth within a shared acoustic environment. When an invasive insect species begins emitting continuous, low-frequency mating calls throughout a canopy, a native songbird species initially responds by shifting its vocalizations to higher frequency bands to avoid signal overlap. Although this frequency elevation successfully restores acoustic clarity among nearby nestmates, high-frequency sound waves undergo significantly greater atmospheric attenuation and structural absorption by dense foliage over longer distances.

To compensate for the resulting reduction in spatial range, the songbirds must dramatically increase their vocal amplitude. However, this elevated volume creates an unintended vulnerability by rendering the songbirds far more conspicuous to acoustic predators operating within the same canopy. To mitigate this heightened predation risk without completely abandoning reproductive signaling, the songbirds eventually alter their behavioral repertoire by restricting their calls to extremely brief, unpredictable bursts during early twilight hours when predator hunting activity temporarily wanes.

What begins as a targeted physiological adjustment to preserve signal fidelity thus cascades into a comprehensive restructuring of the species' temporal activity budget and anti-predator behavior. Researchers emphasize that the key driver of this final state is not the initial acoustic interference itself, but rather the cumulative trade-offs incurred at each successive stage of behavioral compensation.

Which of the following scenarios is most analogous to the process of "cascade signal displacement" described in the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A software firm switches its mobile application's wireless protocol to a higher frequency band to avoid network interference from competing applications; because higher frequencies have shorter operational range, the firm boosts transmitter power, which unintentionally exposes user location data to third-party hackers, leading the firm to restrict data transmissions to brief, randomized bursts during off-peak hours.

Cevap

The scenario describing a software firm altering its protocol, boosting power, exposing data, and restricting transmission times is most analogous to cascade signal displacement.
The correct response isolates the abstract principle of cascade signal displacement: a primary adaptation to avoid interference causes performance degradation over distance, prompting an intensity increase that exposes the system to third-party exploitation, which ultimately forces the system to operate only during restricted, low-risk time windows. The option describing a software firm modifying wireless frequency bands, experiencing range loss, raising power, exposing location data to hackers, and restricting transmissions to randomized off-peak bursts mirrors this exact four-stage functional sequence in a technological domain.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the core structural mechanism of the passage concept.
Cascade signal displacement involves four sequential steps: (1) an initial shift in transmission channel/frequency to avoid signal interference, (2) an unexpected loss in transmission distance/range, (3) an increase in signal power/amplitude to restore range, which creates vulnerability to an external threat, and (4) a final operational constraint restricting activity to brief, off-peak windows to avoid that threat.
Abstracting the functional relationships independent of biological context is necessary to evaluate parallel logic.
2
Evaluate the option choices against this four-stage logical structure.
The option involving the software firm matches every stage precisely: changing frequency bands to avoid interference, suffering range loss, boosting transmitter power, creating security vulnerabilities to hackers (analogous to predators), and restricting data bursts to off-peak times (analogous to twilight calling).
A true parallel reasoning choice must match the structural flow and cause-effect chain rather than surface subject matter.

Anahtar Kavram

Structural Analogy in Reading Comprehension
Soru 1997Soru

A commercial real estate firm manages two types of properties: Office buildings and Retail centers. Last year, the average monthly maintenance cost per property was 4,000forOfficebuildingsand4,000 for Office buildings and 2,500 for Retail centers. What was the average monthly maintenance cost per property across all properties managed by the firm last year?

(1) Last year, the ratio of the number of Office buildings to the number of Retail centers managed by the firm was 3 to 2.
(2) Last year, the total monthly maintenance cost for all Office buildings managed by the firm was $72,000.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
The overall average cost is a weighted average of the two individual property averages. To find a weighted average between two known values (4,000and4,000 and 2,500), only the relative ratio or percentage distribution of the two components is required. Statement (1) provides the exact ratio of Office buildings to Retail centers (3:23:2), which allows direct calculation of the weighted average ($3,400). Statement (2) only reveals that there are 18 Office buildings, leaving the number of Retail centers unknown, so the average cannot be calculated.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the question target algebraically.
Let OO be the number of Office buildings and RR be the number of Retail centers. The average monthly maintenance cost across all properties is 4000O+2500RO+R=2500+1500(OO+R)\frac{4000O + 2500R}{O + R} = 2500 + 1500\left(\frac{O}{O + R}\right). Thus, finding the proportion OO+R\frac{O}{O + R} or the ratio OR\frac{O}{R} is sufficient to determine the overall average cost.
Rephrasing shows that only the relative weighting of property types is required, not their absolute numbers.
2
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) gives OR=32\frac{O}{R} = \frac{3}{2}. This implies OO+R=33+2=35=0.6\frac{O}{O + R} = \frac{3}{3 + 2} = \frac{3}{5} = 0.6. The overall average cost is 4000(0.6)+2500(0.4)=2400+1000=34004000(0.6) + 2500(0.4) = 2400 + 1000 = 3400. Thus, Statement (1) alone is sufficient.
Knowing the ratio provides the exact relative weights needed for the weighted average calculation.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) states that 4000O=72,0004000 \cdot O = 72,000, which gives O=18O = 18. However, no information is given regarding RR, the number of Retail centers. Since RR can take any positive integer value, the weighted average cannot be determined. Thus, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Knowing the quantity of one group without any information about the second group leaves the weighted average undefined.

Anahtar Kavram

Weighted Average and Ratio Sufficiency in Data Sufficiency
Soru 1998Soru

Passage:
In 1291, the Great Council of Venice enacted legislation requiring all glassmaking furnaces within the city core to be relocated to the neighboring island of Murano. While official decrees cited the imperative to mitigate catastrophic urban fire risks posed by high-temperature kilns operating in dense timber-built neighborhoods, economic historians emphasize a concomitant strategic motivation: centralized containment of glassmakers enabled tighter state surveillance over proprietary metallurgical and chemical formulations. Glassblowing had become Venice��s primary export industry, renowned throughout the Mediterranean for crystal-clear soda-lime glass, or cristallo, developed by master artisans using imported Levantine ash. To safeguard this monopoly, the Venetian state imposed severe restrictions on artisan mobility. Guild members were strictly prohibited from traveling outside the republic without explicit magistrate authorization, and exporting raw furnace materials or tools carried heavy financial penalties. However, archival evidence reveals that enforcement was nuanced rather than absolute. Although clandestine emigration of skilled glassblowers to Northern Europe did occur, the Venetian Senate frequently preferred diplomatic incentives and tax amnesties over punitive extraditions to entice absconding masters back to Murano. Consequently, while the state maintained formal legal mechanisms to isolate technological know-how, Murano’s economic dominance persisted primarily because the island concentrated specialized suppliers, specialized lime kilns, and collaborative workshop networks that could not be easily replicated abroad.

According to the passage, which of the following was the official reason cited by Venetian decrees for moving glass furnaces to Murano in 1291?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Mitigating the hazard of fires breaking out in crowded residential quarters of the city

Cevap

The correct answer states that the official reason was mitigating the hazard of fires breaking out in crowded residential quarters of the city.
The passage explicitly states that official decrees cited the imperative to mitigate catastrophic urban fire risks posed by high-temperature kilns operating in dense timber-built neighborhoods. The correct choice provides an accurate paraphrase of this explicit factual detail.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the specific detail requested by the prompt.
The prompt asks specifically for the official reason cited in Venetian decrees for relocating glass furnaces to Murano in 1291.
Direct factual retrieval requires locating the exact text addressing the official rationale.
2
Locate the explicit statement in the passage.
The passage states: 'While official decrees cited the imperative to mitigate catastrophic urban fire risks posed by high-temperature kilns operating in dense timber-built neighborhoods...'
The author explicitly distinguishes between official decree statements and historical analysis.
3
Match the explicit statement with the corresponding answer choice.
The choice referencing mitigating fire hazards in crowded residential quarters directly paraphrases the explicit passage detail.
Semantically equivalent phrasing captures 'mitigate catastrophic urban fire risks... in dense timber-built neighborhoods'.

Anahtar Kavram

Direct Factual Retrieval in Reading Comprehension
Soru 1999Soru

Many wildlife conservationists argue that constructing wildlife overpasses across major interstates is the most effective method for preventing habitat fragmentation. However, recent financial models indicate that the long-term maintenance costs of these elevated passages significantly exceed initial budget estimates. Because of these ongoing expenses, several regional transport authorities have concluded that building wildlife overpasses is an economically unsustainable policy. Yet, this conclusion ignores the substantial savings generated by reductions in vehicle-animal collisions, emergency response services, and related insurance claims. Therefore, constructing wildlife overpasses remains a financially sound public strategy.

In the argument given, the two bolded portions play which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a finding that has been used to support a position that the argument opposes; the second is a consideration presented to challenge that position and support the author's main conclusion.

Cevap

The first bolded statement is a finding used to support a position that the argument opposes, while the second bolded statement is a consideration presented to challenge that position and support the author's main conclusion.
The correct answer accurately describes the dual roles in the argument's structure. The argument begins by introducing evidence (the first bolded statement regarding maintenance costs) that transport authorities use to claim overpasses are financially unsustainable—a view the author ultimately refutes. The author then introduces the second bolded statement (highlighting collision-reduction savings) to demonstrate that the authorities' conclusion is flawed and to justify the author's final conclusion that overpasses are financially sound.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's main conclusion and overall argument structure.
Main conclusion: 'Therefore, constructing wildlife overpasses remains a financially sound public strategy.' The author is defending the financial viability of overpasses.
Determining the main stance establishes the framework against which all premises and counterclaims are evaluated.
2
Analyze the function of the first bolded statement.
Statement: 'recent financial models indicate that the long-term maintenance costs of these elevated passages significantly exceed initial budget estimates.' Function: Evidence used by transport authorities to conclude overpasses are unsustainable. Stance: Opposes the author's position.
Understanding who relies on this claim and how it impacts the debate clarifies its role as opposing evidence.
3
Analyze the function of the second bolded statement.
Statement: 'this conclusion ignores the substantial savings generated by reductions in vehicle-animal collisions, emergency response services, and related insurance claims.' Function: A consideration introduced by the author to undermine the authorities' judgment and support the main conclusion.
Recognizing that this premise refutes the intermediate opposing conclusion confirms its role as supporting evidence for the author's main claim.
4
Match the identified roles with the correct answer option.
The option stating that the first is a finding supporting an opposing position and the second is a consideration challenging that position matches the structural analysis perfectly.
Precise alignment between the logical breakdown and the option description ensures accurate selection.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Bolded Statement Roles
Soru 2000Soru

Hospital administrators have proposed implementing a tele-triage system to redirect non-urgent emergency department patients to nearby clinics. Opponents argue that this initiative will reduce overall patient satisfaction because patients expect direct hospital care. However, these opponents fail to consider that non-urgent patients currently wait over four hours for treatment in the emergency department. Since nearby clinics complete treatments in less than an hour, the proposed tele-triage system will actually increase patient satisfaction.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The first is a proposed plan that the argument defends against criticism; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

Cevap

The statement describing the first bolded portion as a proposed plan defended by the argument and the second as the main conclusion correctly identifies both structural roles.
The correct option accurately identifies the two roles: the first bolded phrase introduces the proposed tele-triage plan that the author defends against critics, and the second bolded phrase expresses the author's main conclusion that the plan will ultimately increase patient satisfaction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the main purpose of the author's argument and overall structure.
The author outlines a plan (tele-triage system), notes critics' objections regarding patient satisfaction, counters their rationale, and concludes that the system will increase patient satisfaction.
Identifying the author's stance and contrast points clarifies how each claim functions in the logical flow.
2
Evaluate the specific structural role of the first bolded statement.
The first bolded statement introduces the tele-triage proposal. The author goes on to refute critics of this proposal, showing the argument is designed to defend this plan.
Determining whether the author supports or rejects the first bolded claim eliminates options mischaracterizing the author's stance.
3
Evaluate the specific structural role of the second bolded statement.
The second bolded statement asserts that the tele-triage system will actually increase patient satisfaction. This is the main point the author aims to prove.
Distinguishing the main conclusion from supporting premises or intermediate claims establishes the precise role of the second bolded statement.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Bolded Statement Roles
ÖncekiSayfa 100 / 110Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — GMAT | Examkin