Tüm alıştırma soruları

2195 soru

Soru 1081Soru

A service technician travels by boat from Pier 1 to an offshore platform at a constant speed of 3030 miles per hour. Immediately upon arrival, the technician returns along the exact same route to Pier 1 at a constant speed of 6060 miles per hour. If the entire round-trip journey takes 33 hours, what is the total distance, in miles, traveled by the technician?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 120120

Cevap

120 miles
To find the total distance, we must account for the time spent on each leg. Letting dd be the one-way distance, the outbound time is d30\frac{d}{30} and the return time is d60\frac{d}{60}. Summing these gives d30+d60=3\frac{d}{30} + \frac{d}{60} = 3 hours, which simplifies to 3d60=3\frac{3d}{60} = 3, leading to d=60d = 60 miles. Since the technician completes a round trip, the total distance traveled is 2×60=1202 \times 60 = 120 miles.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define variables for distance and express travel times for each leg of the trip.
Let dd be the one-way distance between Pier 1 and the offshore platform. Time to reach platform: t1=d30t_1 = \frac{d}{30} hours. Time to return: t2=d60t_2 = \frac{d}{60} hours.
Time equals distance divided by speed (t=dvt = \frac{d}{v}).
2
Set up an equation using total time.
t1+t2=d30+d60=3t_1 + t_2 = \frac{d}{30} + \frac{d}{60} = 3
The total duration for both legs combined is given as 33 hours.
3
Solve for the one-way distance dd.
Find a common denominator: 2d60+d60=3d60=d20=3    d=60\frac{2d}{60} + \frac{d}{60} = \frac{3d}{60} = \frac{d}{20} = 3 \implies d = 60 miles.
Combining fractional terms allows isolated calculation of the one-way distance.
4
Calculate the total round-trip distance.
Total distance =2d=2×60=120= 2d = 2 \times 60 = 120 miles.
The question specifically asks for the total distance traveled during the entire round trip.

Anahtar Kavram

Average Speed and Total Distance in Round-Trip Scenarios
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1082Soru

Let aa, bb, and cc be integers such that 5a3-5 \le a \le 3, 4b6-4 \le b \le 6, and 3c4-3 \le c \le 4. If ab<0a b < 0 and bc2>0b c^2 > 0, what is the maximum possible value of the expression acb\frac{a - c}{b}?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 2

Cevap

The maximum possible value of the expression is 2.
From bc2>0b c^2 > 0, since c2>0c^2 > 0 for any non-zero real number cc, it follows that b>0b > 0 and c0c \neq 0. Given ab<0a b < 0 and b>0b > 0, aa must be strictly negative (a<0a < 0). To maximize acb\frac{a - c}{b} where b>0b > 0, we maximize the numerator (ac)(a - c) and minimize the denominator bb. The maximum negative integer for aa is 1-1, and the minimum integer for cc is 3-3, giving a maximum numerator of 1(3)=2-1 - (-3) = 2. The minimum positive integer for bb is 11. Hence, the maximum value is 21=2\frac{2}{1} = 2.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the sign of bc2>0b c^2 > 0
b>0b > 0 and c0c \neq 0
The square of any non-zero real number is strictly positive (c2>0c^2 > 0), so bb must be positive for the product bc2b c^2 to be positive.
2
Analyze the sign of ab<0a b < 0
a<0a < 0
Since b>0b > 0, aa must be negative for their product to be less than zero.
3
Determine candidate integer sets
a{5,4,3,2,1}a \in \{-5, -4, -3, -2, -1\}, b{1,2,3,4,5,6}b \in \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}, c{3,2,1,1,2,3,4}c \in \{-3, -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, 4\}
Filter the given intervals by the sign restrictions (a<0a < 0, b>0b > 0, c0c \neq 0).
4
Optimize numerator (ac)(a - c) and denominator bb
a=1a = -1, c=3c = -3, b=1b = 1
To maximize a quotient with a positive denominator, make the numerator as large as possible (ac=1(3)=2a - c = -1 - (-3) = 2) and the denominator as small as possible (b=1b = 1).
5
Evaluate the maximum value
2
1(3)1=21=2\frac{-1 - (-3)}{1} = \frac{2}{1} = 2.

Anahtar Kavram

Deducing sign constraints from products and powers of variables and optimizing algebraic quotients under sign and domain restrictions.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 1083Soru

Read the following passage regarding marine calcification during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum:

For several decades, paleoclimatologists maintained that marine calcifying organisms, particularly coccolithophores, would invariably experience diminished shell formation during periods of rapid oceanic acidification. Early laboratory simulations consistently corroborated this paradigm, demonstrating that elevated concentrations of dissolved carbon dioxide lowered seawater pH and reduced carbonate ion availability, thereby severely inhibiting biogenic calcification. Consequently, mainstream marine ecological models treated this inverse relationship as an unassailable baseline, forecasting catastrophic declines in planktonic biomass during hyperthermal events throughout Earth's history. Researchers reasoned that without adequate carbonate ions, micro-organisms could not synthesize calcium carbonate exoskeletons effectively.

However, recent high-resolution isotopic analyses of deep-sea microfossil sediment cores corresponding to the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) present a striking empirical contradiction. Contrary to the prevailing assumption of uniform biological decline, several dominant coccolithophore species actually exhibited accelerated calcification and increased cellular volume during the onset of carbon injection. This unexpected metabolic flexibility challenged existing paradigms that viewed calcification and photosynthesis as strictly decoupled processes under stress. Geochemists now hypothesize that elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide enhanced photosynthetic carbon fixation, which effectively buffered the organisms against the physiological stress imposed by ambient acidification.

Nonetheless, this metabolic compensatory mechanism proved temporally constrained. As ocean warming persisted and upper-water-column stratification intensified, surface nutrient depletion ultimately constrained photosynthetic efficiency, precipitating a delayed secondary decline in calcification rates. Ultimately, understanding these transitional phases is essential for accurately forecasting modern marine ecosystem responses to contemporary carbon emissions. Therefore, rather than validating either simple linear collapse or uninterrupted evolutionary resilience, the PETM record reveals a dynamic, multi-phase trajectory governed by successive physiological trade-offs and ecological bottlenecks.

Match each structural pivot or transition phrase from the passage (on the left) to its precise rhetorical function within the passage's argument trajectory (on the right).

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

"However" (Paragraph 2, Line 1)
"Contrary to the prevailing assumption of uniform biological decline" (Paragraph 2, Line 2)
"Nonetheless" (Paragraph 3, Line 1)
"Therefore" (Paragraph 3, Line 5)

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct pairings match each structural indicator to its precise role: 'However' signals the shift to challenging empirical findings; 'Contrary to the prevailing assumption...' contrasts expected outcomes with observed anomalies; 'Nonetheless' introduces a temporal boundary condition qualifying the counter-evidence; and 'Therefore' synthesizes the entire multi-stage argument into a definitive final takeaway.
Each transition word serves a specific structural purpose in guiding the passage's logical flow. 'However' introduces the counter-evidence to the traditional consensus. 'Contrary to...' specifies the exact point of divergence between theory and empirical observation. 'Nonetheless' prevents overgeneralization of the counter-evidence by introducing a constraint. 'Therefore' signals the final inductive/deductive synthesis of the entire argument.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage structure to identify the main argument stages.
Paragraph 1 outlines an old consensus; Paragraph 2 presents counter-evidence of temporary resilience; Paragraph 3 limits that resilience and provides a synthesized conclusion.
Tracking the overall macro-trajectory enables precise mapping of transition words.
2
Evaluate the pivot 'However' at the start of Paragraph 2.
It bridges Paragraph 1's consensus model with Paragraph 2's new empirical discoveries, acting as a major macro-pivot.
Determines whether the pivot functions at the sentence level or passage-organization level.
3
Evaluate the phrase 'Contrary to the prevailing assumption of uniform biological decline'.
It directly juxtaposes the assumption of universal decline with the observed increase in cellular volume and calcification.
Identifies the specific micro-level contrast between expected theory and anomalous data.
4
Analyze 'Nonetheless' at the start of Paragraph 3 and 'Therefore' at the conclusion.
'Nonetheless' signals a limitation/restriction on the positive findings in Paragraph 2, while 'Therefore' leads into the final thesis unifiying the multi-stage response.
Distinguishes between qualifying counter-arguments and drawing final overarching conclusions.

Anahtar Kavram

Tracking Structural Pivots and Transitions
Soru 1084Soru

A secure access code is formed by arranging all 66 of the distinct characters A,E,B,C,D,A, E, B, C, D, and FF in a single line. If the two vowels (AA and EE) cannot be adjacent to each other, and the code cannot begin with the consonant BB, how many different valid access codes can be formed?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 408

Cevap

408 valid access codes can be formed.
To find the number of valid arrangements satisfying both conditions, we use complementary counting. First, the total number of arrangements of 6 distinct characters is 6! = 720. Next, we determine the number of invalid arrangements. Let V be the set of arrangements where A and E are adjacent: treating (AE) as a single unit gives 5! × 2! = 240 ways. Let B_first be the set of arrangements starting with B: fixing B in the first spot leaves 5! = 120 ways. The intersection of these two invalid sets (where A and E are adjacent AND the code starts with B) places B in position 1 and arranges the remaining 4 items including the (AE) block in 4! × 2! = 48 ways. By inclusion-exclusion, the total invalid arrangements equal 240 + 120 - 48 = 312. Subtracting invalid arrangements from the total gives 720 - 312 = 408 valid access codes.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Calculate the total total number of unrestricted linear arrangements of the 6 distinct characters.
6! = 720 total arrangements.
6 distinct characters can be ordered in 6! different ways.
2
Calculate the number of arrangements where the two vowels (A and E) ARE adjacent (Set V).
|V| = 240 arrangements.
Treating (AE) as 1 block leaves 5 items to arrange in 5! = 120 ways. Since (AE) has 2! = 2 internal arrangements, |V| = 2 * 120 = 240.
3
Calculate the number of arrangements that BEGIN with the consonant B (Set B).
|B| = 120 arrangements.
Fixing B in the first position leaves 5 remaining positions to be filled by the remaining 5 characters in 5! = 120 ways.
4
Calculate the overlap: arrangements where vowels ARE adjacent AND the code BEGINS with B (Set V ∩ B).
|V ∩ B| = 48 arrangements.
With B fixed in position 1, the remaining 5 positions are filled by 4 blocks: (AE), C, D, F. These 4 blocks can be arranged in 4! = 24 ways, and (AE) has 2! = 2 internal orderings, giving 24 * 2 = 48.
5
Apply the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion to find the total invalid arrangements, and subtract from the total.
720 - (240 + 120 - 48) = 720 - 312 = 408 valid arrangements.
The number of invalid arrangements is |V ∪ B| = |V| + |B| - |V ∩ B| = 312. Subtracting invalid codes from total codes yields 408.

Anahtar Kavram

Linear permutations with multiple restrictions using complementary counting and inclusion-exclusion.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1085Soru

A bakery display case contains 88 fruit tarts and 1212 chocolate croissants. If a customer randomly selects 22 pastry items one after another without replacement, what is the probability that the customer chooses exactly 11 fruit tart and 11 chocolate croissant?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 4895\frac{48}{95}

Cevap

The probability that the customer chooses exactly 11 fruit tart and 11 chocolate croissant is 4895\frac{48}{95}.
Selecting one fruit tart and one chocolate croissant can occur in two mutually exclusive orderings: (Fruit Tart, Chocolate Croissant) or (Chocolate Croissant, Fruit Tart). Since the selection is without replacement, the total number of remaining items drops to 1919 for the second draw. The probability of the first order is 820×1219=96380\frac{8}{20} \times \frac{12}{19} = \frac{96}{380}, and the probability of the second order is 1220×819=96380\frac{12}{20} \times \frac{8}{19} = \frac{96}{380}. Summing these gives 192380\frac{192}{380}, which simplifies to 4895\frac{48}{95}.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the total number of items and individual counts.
Total items = 8+12=208 + 12 = 20. Fruit tarts = 88, Chocolate croissants = 1212.
Establishing the initial sample space is necessary for calculating single-event probabilities.
2
Calculate the probability for each distinct order of selection without replacement.
Probability of (Fruit Tart then Chocolate Croissant) = 820×1219=96380\frac{8}{20} \times \frac{12}{19} = \frac{96}{380}. Probability of (Chocolate Croissant then Fruit Tart) = 1220×819=96380\frac{12}{20} \times \frac{8}{19} = \frac{96}{380}.
Because sampling is done without replacement, the total pool decreases from 2020 to 1919 after the first selection.
3
Sum the probabilities of the mutually exclusive outcomes and simplify.
96380+96380=192380=4895\frac{96}{380} + \frac{96}{380} = \frac{192}{380} = \frac{48}{95}.
The desired event occurs if either sequence happens, so the probabilities of the two sequences are added together.

Anahtar Kavram

Probability of Dependent Events (Sampling Without Replacement)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 1086Soru

Passage:

For decades, architectural historians maintained that the introduction of the ribbed vault in twelfth-century Gothic architecture was driven primarily by structural necessity���specifically, the need to reduce the outward lateral thrust on stone walls and enable taller, lighter masonry construction. Proponents of this structuralist paradigm argued that the intersecting stone ribs functioned as a rigid skeletal framework that bore the primary load of the ceiling, rendering the intervening vaulting panels structurally secondary.

However, recent engineering simulations using finite-element analysis have challenged this long-standing consensus. These physical models demonstrate that the stone ribs carry far less dead load than previously assumed, acting primarily as centering guides during construction rather than as permanent weight-bearing armatures. Moreover, acoustic and aesthetic studies suggest that master masons valued ribbed vaulting principally for its optical articulation of interior space and its ability to standardize stone cutting across disparate bay dimensions.

Yet, dismissing the structural contribution of ribbed vaults entirely would be premature. While contemporary structural analysis proves that ribs do not function as independent skeletons, it also reveals that their presence significantly mitigates micro-cracking caused by seismic tremors and thermal expansion. Thus, rather than viewing ribbed vaulting purely as a revolutionary load-bearing innovation or as a mere decorative overlay, scholars should understand it as an integrative masonry technique that harmonized aesthetic articulation with crucial localized stability.

Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Evaluate shifting scholarly views on the function of Gothic ribbed vaulting and advocate a balanced understanding of its role.

Cevap

Evaluate shifting scholarly views on the function of Gothic ribbed vaulting and advocate a balanced understanding of its role.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the passage's three-part structure: reviewing the traditional view, presenting recent counter-evidence, and concluding with a qualified, integrative view that balances both structural and aesthetic functions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the passage structure and structural pivots
Paragraph 1 introduces the traditional structuralist view. Paragraph 2 introduces a pivot ('However') with new engineering and aesthetic evidence. Paragraph 3 introduces a second pivot ('Yet', 'Thus') offering the author's synthesis.
Tracking structural transitions reveals how the author moves from background to counter-evidence to the final thesis.
2
Identify the author's ultimate claim and tone
In the final sentence, the author explicitly claims that scholars should understand ribbed vaulting as 'an integrative masonry technique that harmonized aesthetic articulation with crucial localized stability.'
The primary purpose of a passage coincides with the author's core thesis rather than secondary details or precursor arguments.
3
Match the core thesis against the answer choices while eliminating distractor traps
The option advocating a balanced understanding of shifting scholarly views matches the overarching trajectory of the text.
Distractors that focus on only one paragraph, express overly extreme views, or extrapolate beyond the text fail to encompass the primary purpose.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Primary Purpose and Main Idea
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1087Soru

A logistics company operates two types of delivery trucks: Model A and Model B. Model A consumes 0.250.25 liters of fuel per mile and incurs $1.50\$1.50 in maintenance costs per mile. Model B consumes 0.400.40 liters of fuel per mile and incurs $1.00\$1.00 in maintenance costs per mile. On a given day, the fleet consumed a total of 300300 liters of fuel and incurred a total of $1,100\$1,100 in maintenance costs. What was the total number of miles traveled by the Model A trucks on that day?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 400

Cevap

The Model A trucks traveled a total of 400 miles on that day.
Let xx be the number of miles driven by Model A trucks and yy be the number of miles driven by Model B trucks. Set up two equations: 0.25x+0.40y=3000.25x + 0.40y = 300 (fuel) and 1.50x+1.00y=11001.50x + 1.00y = 1100 (maintenance). Substituting y=11001.5xy = 1100 - 1.5x into the fuel equation yields 0.25x+0.40(11001.5x)=3000.25x + 0.40(1100 - 1.5x) = 300, which simplifies to 0.35x+440=300-0.35x + 440 = 300, leading directly to x=400x = 400.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formulate the linear system
0.25x+0.40y=3000.25x + 0.40y = 300 and 1.50x+1.00y=11001.50x + 1.00y = 1100, where xx is miles driven by Model A and yy is miles driven by Model B.
Translates the rates of fuel consumption and maintenance per mile into total daily figures.
2
Express yy in terms of xx
y=11001.5xy = 1100 - 1.5x
Isolating yy makes substitution into the fuel equation straightforward.
3
Substitute yy into the first equation and solve for xx
0.25x+0.40(11001.5x)=300    0.35x+440=300    0.35x=140    x=4000.25x + 0.40(1100 - 1.5x) = 300 \implies -0.35x + 440 = 300 \implies -0.35x = -140 \implies x = 400
Reduces the system to a single linear equation in xx to find the distance for Model A.

Anahtar Kavram

Setting up and solving a two-variable system of linear equations via substitution or elimination.
Soru 1088Soru

Traditionally, economists believed that high corporate tax rates universally discourage foreign direct investment. Proponents of this view point to statistical models showing a strong correlation between low tax rates and increased capital inflow. However, a recent school of thought argues that tax rates are secondary to structural factors such as infrastructure quality and labor force skills. According to this alternative perspective, multinational firms are often willing to tolerate higher taxes in exchange for robust public services. Ultimately, contemporary analysts synthesize these views into a hybrid model, contending that while tax rates matter, their relative impact depends heavily on a nation's developmental stage.

Which of the following best describes the overall structural organization of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It presents a traditional viewpoint on an economic issue, introduces a competing perspective, and concludes with a hybrid synthesis of both views.

Cevap

The passage presents a traditional viewpoint on an economic issue, introduces a competing perspective, and concludes with a hybrid synthesis of both views.
The correct answer accurately summarizes the progression of the text: beginning with the traditional economic belief, transitioning via a contrast keyword to a modern alternative perspective, and concluding with a third, hybrid position that synthesizes elements of both.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the initial perspective presented in the passage.
The passage opens by introducing the traditional view held by economists that high corporate taxes discourage foreign direct investment.
Tracking the sequence of ideas helps establish the starting point of the passage's structural development.
2
Locate structural pivots and transitions to identify competing viewpoints.
The word 'However' shifts the focus to a recent school of thought arguing that infrastructure and labor skills are more decisive than tax rates.
Transition words signal shifts in perspective, establishing a multi-viewpoint framework.
3
Determine how the passage resolves or concludes the discussion.
The final sentence introduces contemporary analysts who combine both ideas into a hybrid model where tax impact depends on a nation's developmental stage.
The conclusion unifies the competing arguments, confirming the overall structure: traditional view → counterperspective → hybrid synthesis.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Structure of Multi-Viewpoint Passages
Soru 1089Soru

A passage analyzes recent developments in corporate governance and executive compensation. Below are four descriptions of the structural roles played by its paragraphs.

Arrange the structural roles in the correct logical sequence in which they would appear in a standard GMAT reading comprehension passage:

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct logical sequence begins with establishing the traditional compensation model, introducing empirical counterevidence/flaws, presenting a revised governance framework, and concluding with a defense against potential objections.
The standard logical progression in GMAT reading comprehension introduces the background theoretical model first, presents empirical data that challenges that baseline, offers a new solution to resolve the conflict, and concludes by anticipating counterarguments to the new proposal.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the introductory paragraph role
Presenting the traditional model of executive compensation forms the logical starting point.
An argumentative passage begins by outlining the existing baseline or conventional theoretical framework.
2
Identify the structural pivot
Introducing empirical data showing flaws in the traditional model follows the background.
Before advocating a new approach, a passage must demonstrate why the current model is insufficient.
3
Locate the proposed solution
Proposing a revised governance framework follows the critique of the old model.
The alternative solution directly addresses the empirical flaws established in the preceding stage.
4
Determine the concluding evaluation
Addressing potential objections to the proposed framework forms the final stage.
A well-structured passage concludes by defending its proposed alternative against criticisms and summarizing its scope.

Anahtar Kavram

Determining Paragraph Function and Structural Role
Soru 1090Soru

In cognitive linguistics, early researchers hypothesized that conceptual metaphors were merely stylistic flourishes used to ornament pre-existing literal thoughts. Under this traditional model, abstract reasoning occurred independently of bodily experiences, relying entirely on formal amodal symbols. Consequently, metaphors were classified as superficial linguistic features rather than fundamental components of cognitive processing.

However, empirical breakthroughs in embodied cognition during the late twentieth century challenged this disembodied framework. Using reaction-time experiments and neuroimaging, cognitive scientists demonstrated that comprehending abstract domains—such as time or causality—systematically recruits sensorimotor neural circuits. For instance, processing temporal concepts routinely activates spatial representations in the brain, suggesting that metaphoric mapping is an indispensable mechanism of human thought.

Nonetheless, recent critical revisions urge caution against overextending embodied metaphor theory. While acknowledging that sensorimotor simulation plays an initial role in concept acquisition, contemporary scholars argue that as individuals gain domain expertise, abstract concepts undergo a process of structural detachment, becoming increasingly reliant on streamlined symbolic shortcuts. Thus, far from establishing bodily simulation as the sole substrate of abstract thought, structural pivots in current research point toward a hybrid architecture where embodied metaphors and abstract symbols operate dynamically depending on task complexity.

Which of the following best describes how the structural transitions in the passage organize the author's overall argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It outlines a long-standing theoretical model, introduces empirical findings that challenge that model, and ultimately synthesizes these contrasting views into a qualified, hybrid framework.

Cevap

The passage outlines a long-standing theoretical model, introduces empirical findings that challenge that model, and ultimately synthesizes these contrasting views into a qualified, hybrid framework.
The passage follows a three-part structural progression signaled by explicit pivot words. Paragraph 1 presents the traditional amodal model. Paragraph 2 begins with 'However' to introduce empirical evidence from embodied cognition that refutes the traditional view. Paragraph 3 begins with 'Nonetheless' to qualify the embodied view, concluding that human cognition utilizes a hybrid architecture combining both embodied metaphors and abstract symbols.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the function of Paragraph 1 and its initial stance.
Paragraph 1 introduces the traditional, disembodied view of cognition where metaphors are seen as mere decorative flourishes.
Establishing the starting viewpoint sets up the baseline argument before structural pivots occur.
2
Identify the first structural pivot marker in Paragraph 2.
The word 'However' signals a pivot away from the traditional view toward empirical evidence supporting embodied cognition.
Contrastive transitions mark major shifts in argument direction.
3
Identify the second structural pivot marker in Paragraph 3 and evaluate the final resolution.
'Nonetheless' introduces a qualification against overextending embodied theory, leading to a synthesized hybrid model.
Tracking all pivots reveals that the passage does not stop at refutation, but resolves into a balanced synthesis.

Anahtar Kavram

Tracking Structural Pivots and Rhetorical Trajectory
Soru 1091Soru

Consider the following statement regarding 19th-century industrialist Clara Vance:

"Although 19th-century industrialist Clara Vance publicly championed free-market deregulation as the primary driver of national prosperity, her private correspondence reveals that she repeatedly lobbied state legislators to enact protective tariffs on imported textiles to safeguard her own domestic manufacturing empire."

Which of the following is most strongly supported by the statement above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Clara Vance's private actions regarding trade policy were at odds with her publicly expressed stance on economic deregulation.

Cevap

Clara Vance's private actions regarding trade policy were at odds with her publicly expressed stance on economic deregulation.
The correct answer directly follows from the contrast introduced by 'Although'. The sentence contrasts Vance's public advocacy for free-market deregulation with her private lobbying for protective tariffs. This directly supports the deduction that her private actions contradicted her public stance.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural pivot in the sentence.
The conjunction 'Although' sets up a contrast between Vance's public stance (free-market deregulation) and her private actions (lobbying for protective tariffs).
Single-sentence inference items require identifying the direct logical implication of key contrast words.
2
Compare the public position to the private action.
Lobbying for tariffs (government protection/regulation) directly conflicts with advocating for deregulation (free-market non-intervention).
The direct inference must stay strictly within the bounds of the provided contrast without assuming unstated outcomes.

Anahtar Kavram

Single-Sentence Inferences
Soru 1092Soru

For several decades, organizational theorists examining corporate innovation maintained that decentralized firm structures unequivocally foster greater technological adaptability than centralized hierarchies. According to early empirical models, flat management structures eliminate bureaucratic bottlenecks and democratize project selection, thereby enabling rapid deployment of novel research initiatives. Proponents of this paradigm argued that decision-making autonomy granted to lower-level managers accelerates market responsiveness, rendering structural decentralization an essential prerequisite for firms operating in rapidly evolving technological sectors.

However, recent longitudinal analyses of multi-unit technology enterprises challenge this uncritical endorsement of organizational flatness. To be sure, localized autonomy does encourage initial department-level experimentation; yet, without high-level structural integration, cross-unit coordination frequently falters, generating redundant research pipelines and misaligned resource allocation. Far from ensuring sustained innovation, uncoordinated decentralization often prevents firms from synthesizing disparate breakthroughs into comprehensive commercial products. Nevertheless, critics who advocate a total return to rigid top-down command structures overlook a crucial structural subtlety. Contemporary evidence suggests that optimal innovation performance is achieved not by eliminating autonomy entirely, but by establishing hybrid structural pivots—mechanisms that maintain centralized authority over resource synthesis while delegating tactical execution to specialized units.

Which of the following best describes the logical organization of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: It outlines a long-standing theoretical consensus, introduces empirical evidence that challenges its core premise, and ultimately resolves the conflict by proposing a qualified structural synthesis.

Cevap

The passage outlines a long-standing theoretical consensus, introduces empirical evidence that challenges its core premise, and ultimately resolves the conflict by proposing a qualified structural synthesis.
The correct option accurately reflects the three-stage rhetorical structure of the passage: establishing a traditional consensus in Paragraph 1, introducing counter-evidence through structural pivots like 'However' and 'Far from' in Paragraph 2, and resolving the debate through a final pivot ('Nevertheless') that advocates a balanced, hybrid approach.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Paragraph 1 to identify the initial thesis and stance.
Paragraph 1 presents the traditional consensus among organizational theorists that decentralized firm structures foster technological adaptability.
Tracking the initial paragraph sets the baseline argument before structural pivots occur.
2
Track the structural pivot words in Paragraph 2.
'However' shifts the argument to challenge decentralization; 'To be sure... yet' concedes localized benefits while emphasizing systemic failures; 'Far from' rejects the traditional conclusion.
Identifying transition markers reveals how the author introduces opposing evidence and qualifies claims.
3
Analyze the final structural pivot and concluding position.
'Nevertheless' introduces a pivot against the opposing extreme (pure centralization) and presents a hybrid framework combining elements of both models.
Understanding the final pivot is essential to determine how the author resolves the tension between competing viewpoints.

Anahtar Kavram

Tracking Structural Pivots and Rhetorical Transitions
Soru 1093Soru

A motorist travels from Town A to Town B, a distance of 120120 miles, at a constant speed of 6060 miles per hour. On the return trip from Town B to Town A along the exact same route, heavy traffic slows the vehicle's speed to 2020 miles per hour for the first half of the distance. At what constant speed, in miles per hour, must the motorist travel for the remaining half of the return trip so that the average speed for the entire 240240-mile round trip is 3232 miles per hour?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 24

Cevap

24 miles per hour
The correct answer is 24 miles per hour. To achieve an overall average speed of 32 mph over the total 240-mile trip, the entire journey must take exactly 7.5 hours (240/32=7.5240 / 32 = 7.5). The outbound 120-mile trip at 60 mph takes 2 hours (120/60=2120 / 60 = 2). The first 60 miles of the return trip at 20 mph takes 3 hours (60/20=360 / 20 = 3). This leaves 7.55=2.57.5 - 5 = 2.5 hours to complete the final 60 miles. Dividing 60 miles by 2.5 hours yields a required speed of 24 mph.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Calculate the total time required for the entire round trip.
\text{Total Time} = \frac{\text{Total Distance}}{\text{Average Speed}} = \frac{240\text{ miles}}{32\text{ mph}} = 7.5\text{ hours}
Average speed is defined as total distance divided by total time.
2
Calculate the time taken for the outbound trip and the first half of the return trip.
\text{Outbound Time} = \frac{120}{60} = 2\text{ hours}; \quad \text{Return Leg 1 Time} = \frac{60}{20} = 3\text{ hours}
Time equals distance divided by rate for each specific segment.
3
Determine the remaining time and required speed for the final segment of 6060 miles.
\text{Remaining Time} = 7.5 - (2 + 3) = 2.5\text{ hours}; \quad \text{Required Speed} = \frac{60\text{ miles}}{2.5\text{ hours}} = 24\text{ mph}
Dividing the remaining 6060 miles by the remaining 2.52.5 hours gives the required speed.

Anahtar Kavram

Average speed for multi-leg journeys must always be calculated as Total Distance divided by Total Time, not by taking the arithmetic mean of individual speeds.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1094Soru

For decades, evolutionary biologists explained the emergence of eusociality—a cooperative social structure characterized by division of labor and shared brood care—primarily through the lens of kin selection theory, emphasizing high genetic relatedness among nestmates. In hymenopterans like ants and bees, haplodiploidy creates an asymmetric genetic relatedness that ostensibly incentivizes workers to rear sisters rather than produce offspring. Applied broadly, this framework posited that extreme genetic relatedness was a prerequisite for reproductive altruism across animal taxa.

However, the discovery of eusociality in marine sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp (*Synalpheus*) challenged the universality of haplodiploid genetic asymmetry. Unlike hymenopterans, *Synalpheus* shrimp are diploid, meaning full siblings share only 50 percent of their genes, identical to parents and offspring. Initially, researchers attempted to rescue kin selection by pointing to high levels of inbreeding within sponge colonies, arguing that localized mating artificially elevated genetic relatedness to levels mimicking haplodiploidy.

Nevertheless, recent phylogeographic analyses reveal that eusociality in *Synalpheus* evolved independently multiple times in lineages with low inbreeding coefficients and modest colony-wide relatedness. Consequently, ecological constraints—specifically intense competition for defensive host sponges and the severe mortality costs of dispersal—are now recognized as the primary drivers mediating the transition to sociality in these marine invertebrates. Rather than genetic architecture dictating social organization, physical habitat saturation exerts the decisive selection pressure.

Based on the passage, the author introduces the phrase "Nevertheless, recent phylogeographic analyses reveal" in the third paragraph primarily in order to:

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: counter the secondary effort to maintain genetic relatedness as the primary explanation by introducing empirical evidence favoring ecological factors

Cevap

The author uses the pivot phrase to counter the secondary attempt to explain snapping shrimp eusociality via inbreeding, redirecting the argument toward ecological drivers.
The sentence immediately preceding the pivot describes an effort by researchers to preserve the genetic relatedness model by proposing that inbreeding raised relatedness in snapping shrimp. The pivot phrase 'Nevertheless...' introduces empirical evidence showing that inbreeding is actually low in these shrimp, thereby refuting the inbreeding argument and redirecting the passage toward ecological constraints as the main explanation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the context preceding the pivot
The second paragraph notes that researchers tried to 'rescue kin selection' for diploid snapping shrimp by citing localized inbreeding.
Understanding what claim is being addressed requires evaluating the passage state immediately before the structural pivot.
2
Evaluate the contrast marker and subsequent claim
The pivot 'Nevertheless, recent phylogeographic analyses reveal...' introduces data showing low inbreeding coefficients, refuting the prior attempt.
Contrast indicators such as 'nevertheless' signal a shift or refutation of the preceding point.
3
Synthesize the rhetorical purpose of the pivot within the passage trajectory
The pivot dismantles the genetic inbreeding explanation and prepares the reader for the concluding claim that ecological constraints are the true primary drivers.
Identifying paragraph trajectory demonstrates how structural transitions alter the logical direction of the author's argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Tracking Structural Pivots and Rhetorical Transitions
Soru 1095Soru

For decades, classical economic theory posited that market deregulation inherently fosters competitive pricing and innovation by eliminating administrative entry barriers. Adherents of this traditional view argued that in deregulated environments, market forces rapidly penalize inefficient incumbents, allowing more nimble entrants to capture market share. However, empirical studies of late-twentieth-century airline and telecommunications deregulation revealed a persistent paradox: initial periods of intense price competition were frequently followed by wave after wave of corporate consolidation, ultimately producing oligopolies even more concentrated than the regulated monopolies they replaced.

To explain this counterintuitive trajectory, behavioral economists proposed a competing framework centered on economies of scale and strategic predatory pricing. They contended that dominant firms utilize superior capital reserves to sustain temporary losses, thereby undercutting newer rivals until the latter are forced into bankruptcy or acquisition. Yet this behavioral model itself has recently come under scrutiny by institutional analysts. Pointing to cross-industry data, institutionalists demonstrate that consolidation occurred primarily in sectors where capital intensity was combined with high consumer switching costs, whereas low-barrier digital markets remained fragmented despite aggressive pricing by incumbents.

Consequently, modern economic analysts advocate a synthesized perspective. Rather than viewing market structure as a deterministic outcome of deregulation or firm strategy alone, they argue that the post-deregulation evolution of an industry is jointly governed by structural capital requirements and consumer friction.

Which of the following best describes the overall logical organization of the passage?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: A long-standing economic theory is introduced, empirical evidence undermining it is presented, two subsequent explanatory models are evaluated, and a synthesized framework incorporating key elements of both is proposed.

Cevap

The passage is best described as introducing a traditional economic theory, presenting empirical evidence that challenges it, evaluating two subsequent explanatory models, and proposing a synthesized framework.
The option describing the sequence of introducing a traditional theory, presenting empirical counter-evidence, evaluating two competing explanations, and concluding with a synthesized perspective accurately reflects the exact paragraph-by-paragraph rhetorical progression of the text.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze Paragraph 1 structural progression
Identified the starting premise (classical theory of deregulation) followed by a pivot ('However') introducing empirical evidence showing unexpected market consolidation.
Tracking structural pivot words reveals how the passage transitions from an initial theory to its empirical refutation.
2
Analyze Paragraph 2 viewpoint shifts
Identified the behavioral economists' explanation (predatory pricing) followed by a second pivot ('Yet') presenting institutionalists' counter-evidence regarding switching costs and digital markets.
Distinguishing between competing academic perspectives demonstrates the evaluation of multiple intermediate explanatory models.
3
Analyze Paragraph 3 resolution and author conclusion
Identified the author's conclusion ('Consequently'), which offers a synthesized view combining capital requirements and consumer friction.
The final paragraph synthesizes the valid insights of the preceding models into an integrated framework.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Overall Passage Logical Organization
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 1096Soru

Read the passage below and answer the question that follows:

Astronomers long believed that interstellar dust grains formed primarily in the expanding envelopes of cool giant stars. However, recent observations of distant submillimeter galaxies revealed massive dust reservoirs produced when the universe was less than a billion years old. Since giant stars require several billion years to evolve and shed dust, some astrophysicists hypothesized that core-collapse supernovae—the explosive deaths of massive stars—must be the dominant source of early dust. Conversely, a third group of researchers argues that while supernovae produce initial seed grains, most dust growth actually occurs through the accretion of gas-phase atoms in the cold interstellar medium itself, rather than inside stellar ejecta.

Match each theoretical perspective on interstellar dust formation to the core argument or evidence that supports it.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Cool Giant Star Hypothesis
Core-Collapse Supernova Hypothesis
Interstellar Medium Accretion Hypothesis

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Cool Giant Star Hypothesis matches the traditional view of dust forming in expanding outer envelopes over long timescales; Core-Collapse Supernova Hypothesis matches the argument that rapid early dust production requires short-lived massive star explosions; Interstellar Medium Accretion Hypothesis matches the claim that primary dust growth occurs when gas-phase atoms condense onto seeds in cold space.
Each viewpoint in the multi-perspective passage corresponds directly to a specific theoretical role: the traditional model relies on cool giant stars forming dust over long timescales; the supernova model addresses the structural paradox of early dust by citing rapid stellar deaths; and the interstellar accretion model resolves the mechanism of dust expansion by distinguishing initial seed creation from subsequent accretion in space.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the first perspective in the passage (Cool Giant Stars) and locate its underlying premise.
The passage notes astronomers traditionally believed dust forms in expanding envelopes of cool giant stars over several billion years.
Establishes the baseline traditional viewpoint.
2
Analyze the structural pivot ('However...') introducing the second viewpoint (Supernovae).
Early galaxies contain dust despite giant stars evolving too slowly, leading astrophysicists to attribute early dust to rapid supernova explosions.
Connects the supernova hypothesis with the evidence of early-universe dust reservoirs.
3
Analyze the third viewpoint introduced by 'Conversely...' (Interstellar Medium Accretion).
Supernovae only provide seed grains; actual bulk growth happens via gas-phase accretion in the interstellar medium.
Differentiates the mechanism of initial seed creation from main dust growth.

Anahtar Kavram

Analyzing Structure of Multi-Viewpoint Passages
Soru 1097Soru

Read the following passage carefully:

For much of the late nineteenth century, legal scholarship was dominated by classical legal formalism, a paradigm holding that law constitutes an autonomous, internally consistent body of rules from which judicial decisions can be mechanically deduced without recourse to external social considerations. Under this framework, judges were viewed merely as neutral discoverers of objective legal doctrine, whose duty was to apply statutory language and precedent with algorithmic precision.

However, the early twentieth century witnessed the emergence of Legal Realism, a critical movement that challenged formalism’s core premise of judicial neutrality. Realists argued that legal rules are inherently indeterminate and that judicial rulings are primarily shaped by sociological forces, economic pressures, and the subjective values of individual jurists. Rather than viewing judicial opinions as pure logical deductions, Realists framed them as post-hoc rationalizations for decisions arrived at through pragmatic intuition and socio-political inclination.

In response to the perceived subjectivism of Realism, late twentieth-century legal theorists introduced New Textualism, an approach seeking to restore constraint to statutory interpretation without resurrecting formalist idealism. New Textualism insists that judicial analysis must focus strictly on the original public meaning of a statute's text as understood by an ordinary reader at the time of enactment. By disallowing inquiries into subjective legislative intent or policy outcomes, New Textualism aims to curb judicial overreach while acknowledging that judges must interpret, rather than mechanically discover, legal text.

Recently, legal scholars have sought to synthesize these historical perspectives into a hybrid framework. These scholars acknowledge the Realist insight that judges cannot completely disassociate themselves from social context, yet they argue that New Textualism provides an essential institutional boundary. By positioning textual fidelity as a hard constraint within which empirical realities operate, this synthesis attempts to reconcile the descriptive accuracy of Legal Realism with the normative legitimacy demanded by formalist rule-of-law ideals.

Match each paragraph from the passage on the left with its primary structural function within the author's overall argument on the right.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Paragraph 1 (Beginning: 'For much of the late nineteenth century...')
Paragraph 2 (Beginning: 'However, the early twentieth century...')
Paragraph 3 (Beginning: 'In response to the perceived subjectivism...')
Paragraph 4 (Beginning: 'Recently, legal scholars have sought...')

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Paragraph 1 establishes the foundational legal formalist paradigm; Paragraph 2 introduces Legal Realism as a counter-movement emphasizing socio-economic influences; Paragraph 3 presents New Textualism as a methodological refinement constraining judicial discretion; and Paragraph 4 details a contemporary synthesis attempting to harmonize empirical insights with normative legal constraints.
Each paragraph fulfills a distinct chronological and argumentative function in the passage's thesis-antithesis-synthesis progression. Paragraph 1 establishes the baseline formalist school; Paragraph 2 introduces the Realist critique; Paragraph 3 describes the New Textualist reaction; and Paragraph 4 presents a contemporary framework synthesizing the strengths of both positions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the role of Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1 introduces classical legal formalism and defines its core assumption of algorithmic objective deduction.
This sets up the initial historical status quo that subsequent paragraphs critique and refine.
2
Analyze the pivot in Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2 introduces Legal Realism, directly opposing formalism by arguing that socio-economic factors shape rulings.
This serves as a counter-movement exposing the flaws of the original paradigm.
3
Examine the reaction in Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3 introduces New Textualism as a response to Realism, establishing original public meaning to constrain judges.
This functions as a methodological middle ground aimed at preventing judicial overreach without returning to formalist idealism.
4
Determine the resolution in Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4 presents a contemporary hybrid framework synthesizing Legal Realism's empirical insights with textualism's boundaries.
This brings closure to the passage by reconciling the opposing theoretical perspectives.

Anahtar Kavram

Determining Paragraph Function and Structural Role
Soru 1098Soru

Read the following passage regarding corporate strategy and technological adoption:

For over a decade, management theorists argued that enterprise adoption of artificial intelligence would immediately yield substantial operational cost savings. Initial empirical studies supported this premise, showing short-term productivity boosts in highly automated customer service departments. However, recent longitudinal analyses reveal that these initial gains were offset by rising infrastructure maintenance costs and workforce retraining expenses. Nevertheless, corporate leadership continues to expand AI budgets, operating under the assumption that long-term strategic advantages will eventually outweigh these ongoing expenditures. Ultimately, while AI adoption may not produce the immediate financial windfalls originally envisioned, its capacity to fundamentally restructure business models ensures its permanent integration into corporate strategy.

Based on the structural pivots and transition words in the passage, place the following logical stages of the author's argument trajectory in the correct order from beginning to end.

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct logical sequence follows the passage's structural transitions from the initial traditional premise and early empirical support, through the contrastive pivot revealing hidden costs ('However'), continuing to the concessive pivot highlighting sustained corporate investment ('Nevertheless'), and culminating in the final resolution of long-term strategic value ('Ultimately').
The passage follows a classical four-stage rhetorical progression driven by transition markers: (1) Baseline context and early studies establishing the initial cost-saving premise; (2) The pivot word 'However', which introduces contrasting longitudinal evidence of high maintenance/retraining costs; (3) The transition 'Nevertheless', which notes corporate leaders expanding budgets regardless of those costs; and (4) The final pivot 'Ultimately', which resolves the tension by positing long-term business model restructuring as the true value driver.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the initial baseline assertion of the passage.
The passage opens by introducing the decade-long belief of management theorists regarding immediate cost savings, supported by early empirical studies.
This establishes the traditional viewpoint that sets up the rest of the discourse.
2
Locate the first major structural pivot word and determine the shift in logic.
The word 'However' pivots from initial short-term boosts to longitudinal analyses showing offsetting maintenance and retraining expenses.
Contrastive pivots like 'However' introduce evidence that undermines or complicates the initial baseline premise.
3
Identify the second structural transition and its rhetorical function.
The word 'Nevertheless' indicates that despite the aforementioned negative evidence, corporate leaders continue expanding AI budgets.
Concessive transitions such as 'Nevertheless' show an ongoing trend or action persisting despite a counter-argument.
4
Identify the final concluding transition and determine the logical endpoint.
The word 'Ultimately' signals the final synthesis, shifting focus from short-term financial gains to permanent business model restructuring.
Summary indicators like 'Ultimately' introduce the author's final position and overarching takeaway.

Anahtar Kavram

Tracking Structural Pivots and Transitions
Soru 1099Soru

Passage:
For much of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, historical geology operated within the framework of Charles Lyell’s principle of uniformitarianism, which asserted that the forces shaping Earth’s surface have remained uniform in rate and intensity throughout deep time. Lyell’s formulation was crucial to establishing geology as a legitimate empirical discipline, effectively displacing supernatural models of sudden planetary devastation. By insisting that only observable, incremental processes—such as steady erosion and gradual sedimentation—could be invoked to explain geological formations, Lyell provided a powerful methodological tool that standardized field observation and stratigraphic analysis.

However, this dogmatic commitment to strict gradualism inadvertently obscured the role of infrequent, highly energetic phenomena in Earth’s evolution. Beginning in the 1980s, geochemical evidence of iridium anomalies at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary persuaded paleontologists that a massive bolide impact triggered a sudden global extinction event. Rather than invalidating Lyell’s foundational insight that natural laws are invariant, this revelation forced a nuanced synthesis. Contemporary geologists distinguish between physical uniformitarianism—the constancy of chemical and physical laws—and strict methodological gradualism. The primary purpose of modern historical geology is thus no longer to fit all planetary phenomena into a slow, invariant mold, but rather to analyze how persistent background mechanisms interact dynamically with catastrophic, low-frequency events to drive planetary change.

Statement: The primary purpose of the passage is to explain how modern geology reconciled Lyell’s gradualist uniformitarianism with evidence of sudden catastrophic events to form a more dynamic understanding of Earth’s history.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement accurately captures the overarching scope and primary purpose of the passage, which describes the conceptual evolution of geology from strict Lyellian gradualism to a modern framework that synthesizes uniform background processes with catastrophic events.
The statement is True because the passage systematically traces how geological thought evolved from Lyell's strict gradualism to a contemporary synthesis that accounts for both steady background processes and catastrophic events.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural progression and pivots of the passage.
The first paragraph describes Lyell's uniformitarianism and its historical importance. The second paragraph introduces a pivot ('However') showing how strict gradualism obscured catastrophic events, followed by evidence of bolide impacts and the resulting modern synthesis.
Identifying the transition from the initial paradigm to the revised synthesis is necessary to determine the author's primary concern.
2
Evaluate the statement against the entire passage scope.
The statement correctly synthesizes both paragraphs, capturing the transition from classic uniformitarianism to the modern integrated view.
A primary purpose statement must encompass the full arc of the passage rather than focusing exclusively on isolated details.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Primary Purpose and Main Idea
Soru 1100Soru

A dataset consists of 7 integers listed in ascending order: 3,4,4,x,9,y,153, 4, 4, x, 9, y, 15. If the unique mode of the dataset is 44 and the arithmetic mean of the dataset is equal to its median, what is the value of yy?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: 13

Cevap

The value of yy is 13.
Because the dataset is in ascending order, the median of the 7 terms is the 4th term, xx. Setting the mean 35+x+y7\frac{35 + x + y}{7} equal to xx yields y=6x35y = 6x - 35. Since yy lies between 99 and 1515 inclusive, solving 96x35159 \le 6x - 35 \le 15 gives x=8x = 8. Substituting x=8x = 8 into y=6x35y = 6x - 35 gives y=13y = 13.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Determine the median of the 7-element ordered set.
The median is the 4th term, xx.
For an odd number of ordered terms (n=7n = 7), the median is the 7+12=4th\frac{7+1}{2} = 4\text{th} term.
2
Set up the equation equating the arithmetic mean to the median.
35+x+y7=x\frac{35 + x + y}{7} = x, which simplifies to y=6x35y = 6x - 35.
The mean of a dataset is the sum of all elements divided by the total number of elements.
3
Apply the ascending order constraint to find the value of xx.
Since 9y159 \le y \le 15, we have 96x35159 \le 6x - 35 \le 15, giving 446x5044 \le 6x \le 50. The only integer value for xx in this range is 88.
The dataset is listed in ascending order, so the element yy after 99 and before or equal to 1515 must satisfy 9y159 \le y \le 15.
4
Calculate the value of yy.
y=6(8)35=13y = 6(8) - 35 = 13.
Substitute x=8x = 8 back into the simplified linear equation relating xx and yy.

Anahtar Kavram

Relating arithmetic mean and median in an ordered set using inequalities derived from ascending order constraints.
Tahmini Süre:1m 40s
ÖncekiSayfa 55 / 110Sonraki
Tüm alıştırma soruları — GMAT | Examkin