Number Properties and Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency

40 soru

Soru 21Soru

If aa and bb are positive real numbers such that abab is an integer, is aa an integer?

(1) a+ba + b is an integer.
(2) aba - b is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
Combining both statements shows that 2a2a and 2b2b are integers. This restricts aa to being either a whole integer or a half-integer. Evaluating the product of two half-integers reveals that their product has a denominator of 4 and can never be an integer. Since the question stem specifies that abab is an integer, aa must be an integer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem and given constraints
aa and bb are positive real numbers and ab=Nab = N, where NN is an integer. We must determine whether aa is guaranteed to be an integer.
The variables are defined as real numbers, so we cannot assume they are integers unless forced by the mathematical statements.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): a+ba + b is an integer
Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
Let a=2+3a = 2 + \sqrt{3} and b=23b = 2 - \sqrt{3}. Both are positive real numbers. Here a+b=4a + b = 4 (an integer) and ab=(2+3)(23)=1ab = (2+\sqrt{3})(2-\sqrt{3}) = 1 (an integer). However, a=2+3a = 2 + \sqrt{3} is not an integer. Conversely, if a=3a = 3 and b=1b = 1, then a+b=4a + b = 4 and ab=3ab = 3, and aa is an integer. Thus, Statement (1) alone does not uniquely determine if aa is an integer.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): aba - b is an integer
Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
Let a=1+52a = \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2} and b=1+52b = \frac{-1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}. Both are positive real numbers. Here ab=1a - b = 1 (an integer) and ab=(5+1)(51)4=1ab = \frac{(\sqrt{5}+1)(\sqrt{5}-1)}{4} = 1 (an integer). However, aa is not an integer. Conversely, if a=4a = 4 and b=1b = 1, then ab=3a - b = 3 and ab=4ab = 4, and aa is an integer. Thus, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
4
Evaluate Statement (1) and Statement (2) combined
Both statements together are SUFFICIENT.
Let a+b=ka + b = k and ab=ma - b = m, where kk and mm are integers. Adding the two equations gives 2a=k+m    a=k+m22a = k + m \implies a = \frac{k+m}{2}. Subtracting gives 2b=km    b=km22b = k - m \implies b = \frac{k-m}{2}. Since kk and mm are integers, k+mk+m and kmk-m are integers with the same parity. If k+mk+m is even, both aa and bb are integers. If k+mk+m is odd, a=p2a = \frac{p}{2} and b=q2b = \frac{q}{2} for odd integers pp and qq. But then ab=pq4ab = \frac{pq}{4}, which cannot be an integer because the product of two odd integers is odd and thus not divisible by 4. This contradicts the stem constraint that abab is an integer. Therefore, k+mk+m must be even, forcing aa to be an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Real number vs. integer constraints and parity properties in quadratic system equations
Soru 22Soru

If mm and nn are real numbers, is m+nm + n an integer?

(1) mnm - n is an integer.
(2) m2n2m^2 - n^2 is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Cevap

Statements (1) and (2) together are not sufficient.
Evaluating Statement (1) alone: If m=2m = \sqrt{2} and n=2n = \sqrt{2}, then mn=0m - n = 0 (an integer), but m+n=22m + n = 2\sqrt{2} is not an integer. If m=2m = 2 and n=1n = 1, then mn=1m - n = 1 (an integer) and m+n=3m + n = 3 is an integer. Thus, Statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

Evaluating Statement (2) alone: If m=2m = \sqrt{2} and n=1n = 1, then m2n2=1m^2 - n^2 = 1 (an integer), but m+n=2+1m + n = \sqrt{2} + 1 is not an integer. If m=2m = 2 and n=1n = 1, then m2n2=3m^2 - n^2 = 3 (an integer) and m+n=3m + n = 3 is an integer. Thus, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Evaluating Statements (1) and (2) together: Factoring gives m2n2=(mn)(m+n)m^2 - n^2 = (m - n)(m + n). If mn=k0m - n = k \neq 0 and m2n2=pm^2 - n^2 = p for integers kk and pp, then m+n=pkm + n = \frac{p}{k}. This establishes that m+nm + n must be rational, but a rational number is not necessarily an integer. For example, if m=54m = \frac{5}{4} and n=34n = -\frac{3}{4}, then mn=2m - n = 2 (an integer) and m2n2=1m^2 - n^2 = 1 (an integer), but m+n=12m + n = \frac{1}{2} is not an integer. If m=2m = 2 and n=0n = 0, both statements hold and m+n=2m + n = 2 is an integer. Since m+nm + n can be an integer or a non-integer, both statements together are not sufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem and identify variable constraints.
The variables mm and nn are defined as real numbers, NOT necessarily integers.
Failing to account for non-integer real values is a primary trap in GMAT Data Sufficiency number property questions.
2
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) states mn=km - n = k for some integer kk.
If m=2m = 2 and n=1n = 1, mn=1m - n = 1 (integer) and m+n=3m + n = 3 (integer).
If m=2m = \sqrt{2} and n=2n = \sqrt{2}, mn=0m - n = 0 (integer) and m+n=22m + n = 2\sqrt{2} (not an integer).
Since m+nm + n can be an integer or non-integer, Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
Testing both integer and irrational values reveals that a difference being an integer does not constrain the sum to be an integer.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) states m2n2=pm^2 - n^2 = p for some integer pp.
If m=2m = 2 and n=1n = 1, m2n2=3m^2 - n^2 = 3 (integer) and m+n=3m + n = 3 (integer).
If m=2m = \sqrt{2} and n=1n = 1, m2n2=1m^2 - n^2 = 1 (integer) and m+n=2+1m + n = \sqrt{2} + 1 (not an integer).
Since m+nm + n can be an integer or non-integer, Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
Testing non-integer values shows that the difference of squares being an integer does not guarantee that the sum is an integer.
4
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) together.
We have mn=km - n = k and (mn)(m+n)=p(m - n)(m + n) = p for integers kk and pp.
If k=0k = 0, m=nm = n, so mn=0m - n = 0 and m2n2=0m^2 - n^2 = 0. In this case m+n=2mm + n = 2m, which can be non-integer if m=2m = \sqrt{2}.
If k0k \neq 0, then m+n=pkm + n = \frac{p}{k}. This proves that m+nm + n is a rational number, but not necessarily an integer.
For instance, let m=54m = \frac{5}{4} and n=34n = -\frac{3}{4}:
- mn=54(34)=2m - n = \frac{5}{4} - \left(-\frac{3}{4}\right) = 2 (integer)
- m2n2=2516916=1m^2 - n^2 = \frac{25}{16} - \frac{9}{16} = 1 (integer)
- m+n=54+(34)=12m + n = \frac{5}{4} + \left(-\frac{3}{4}\right) = \frac{1}{2} (not an integer).
Conversely, if m=2m = 2 and n=0n = 0, mn=2m - n = 2 (integer), m2n2=4m^2 - n^2 = 4 (integer), and m+n=2m + n = 2 (integer).
Because m+nm + n can still be an integer or a non-integer, both statements together are NOT sufficient.
Algebraic division demonstrates that the sum is guaranteed to be rational, but rational numbers include non-integer fractions.

Anahtar Kavram

Real Number Constraints vs. Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 23Soru

If mm and nn are positive integers, is m2n2m^2 - n^2 a prime number?

(1) mn=1m - n = 1
(2) m+n=7m + n = 7

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
Rephrasing the question stem shows m2n2=(mn)(m+n)m^2 - n^2 = (m - n)(m + n). Statement (1) alone allows 2n+12n + 1 to be prime (for n=1n=1) or composite (for n=4n=4), so it is insufficient. Statement (2) alone allows pairs like (4,3)(4,3) which gives 77 (prime) and (5,2)(5,2) which gives 2121 (composite), so it is insufficient. Combining both statements yields m=4m = 4 and n=3n = 3, giving m2n2=7m^2 - n^2 = 7, which definitively answers 'Yes'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the question stem using algebraic factorization.
m2n2=(mn)(m+n)m^2 - n^2 = (m - n)(m + n). For m2n2m^2 - n^2 to be a prime number, since mm and nn are positive integers, the smaller factor (mn)(m - n) must equal 1 and the larger factor (m+n)(m + n) must be a prime number.
Factoring highlights the conditions required for a product of integers to yield a prime number.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): mn=1m - n = 1.
Substitute m=n+1m = n + 1 into m2n2m^2 - n^2: (1)(2n+1)=2n+1(1)(2n + 1) = 2n + 1. If n=1n = 1, then 2(1)+1=32(1) + 1 = 3 (prime, Yes). If n=4n = 4, then 2(4)+1=92(4) + 1 = 9 (composite, No).
Since Statement (1) produces both Yes and No outcomes, it is NOT sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): m+n=7m + n = 7.
Since mm and nn are positive integers, test pairs with m>nm > n: If (m,n)=(4,3)(m, n) = (4, 3), then m2n2=169=7m^2 - n^2 = 16 - 9 = 7 (prime, Yes). If (m,n)=(5,2)(m, n) = (5, 2), then m2n2=254=21m^2 - n^2 = 25 - 4 = 21 (composite, No).
Since Statement (2) produces both Yes and No outcomes, it is NOT sufficient.
4
Evaluate Statement (1) and Statement (2) together.
System of equations: mn=1m - n = 1 and m+n=7m + n = 7. Adding the equations gives 2m=8    m=42m = 8 \implies m = 4, which leads to n=3n = 3. Then m2n2=4232=7m^2 - n^2 = 4^2 - 3^2 = 7, which is prime (Definitive Yes).
Combining the statements yields a single unique pair of values and a definitive Yes answer.

Anahtar Kavram

Difference of squares factorization and prime number properties in Data Sufficiency
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 24Soru

If pp and qq are positive integers, is p2+3qp^2 + 3q divisible by 6?

(1) p+qp + q is an odd integer.
(2) p2q2p^2 - q^2 is divisible by 3.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
The question requires determining whether p2+3qp^2 + 3q is divisible by 6, which demands divisibility by both 2 and 3. By parity rules, p2p(mod2)p^2 \equiv p \pmod 2 and 3qq(mod2)3q \equiv q \pmod 2, meaning p2+3qp^2 + 3q has the same parity as p+qp + q. Statement (1) specifies that p+qp + q is odd, so p2+3qp^2 + 3q is odd and cannot be divisible by 6. This gives a definitive 'No' answer, making Statement (1) alone sufficient. Statement (2) permits cases where p2+3qp^2 + 3q is divisible by 6 (e.g., p=3,q=3p=3, q=3) and cases where it is not (e.g., p=4,q=1p=4, q=1), making Statement (2) alone insufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the question target using number properties and parity rules.
For p2+3qp^2 + 3q to be divisible by 6, it must be divisible by both 2 (even) and 3. For parity, p2p(mod2)p^2 \equiv p \pmod 2 and 3qq(mod2)3q \equiv q \pmod 2, so p2+3qp+q(mod2)p^2 + 3q \equiv p + q \pmod 2. Thus, p2+3qp^2 + 3q is even if and only if p+qp + q is even.
Simplifying the parity constraint simplifies evaluating statements regarding divisibility by 2.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): p+qp + q is an odd integer.
Since p+qp + q is odd, p2+3qp^2 + 3q must be odd. An odd integer cannot be divisible by 2, so p2+3qp^2 + 3q CANNOT be divisible by 6. This yields a definitive 'No'.
In Data Sufficiency Yes/No questions, a definitive 'No' answer means the statement is sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): p2q2p^2 - q^2 is divisible by 3.
Test cases:
- If p=3,q=3p = 3, q = 3: p2q2=0p^2 - q^2 = 0 (divisible by 3), and p2+3q=18p^2 + 3q = 18 (divisible by 6 -> YES).
- If p=4,q=1p = 4, q = 1: p2q2=15p^2 - q^2 = 15 (divisible by 3), and p2+3q=19p^2 + 3q = 19 (not divisible by 6 -> NO).
Since Statement (2) yields both 'Yes' and 'No' outcomes, it is insufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Parity rephrasing and Yes/No Data Sufficiency decision logic
Soru 25Soru

If nn is a positive integer, is nn a multiple of 18?

(1) n2n^2 is divisible by 108.
(2) n3n^3 is divisible by 243.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) alone is sufficient because prime factor analysis of n2n^2 being divisible by 108=22×33108 = 2^2 \times 3^3 requires the exponent of 3 in n2n^2 to be at least 4 (since nn is an integer and exponents in n2n^2 must be even). This guarantees nn is divisible by 21×32=182^1 \times 3^2 = 18. Statement (2) alone is not sufficient because n3n^3 being divisible by 243=35243 = 3^5 only guarantees nn is a multiple of 9, allowing n=9n = 9 (not a multiple of 18) or n=18n = 18 (a multiple of 18).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the target question using prime factorizations.
The target asks if nn is a multiple of 18=21×3218 = 2^1 \times 3^2. For nn to be a multiple of 18, its prime factorization must contain at least one factor of 2 and at least two factors of 3.
Decomposing into prime factors simplifies the condition required for sufficiency.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): n2n^2 is divisible by 108=22×33108 = 2^2 \times 3^3.
Since nn is a positive integer, any prime factor in the prime factorization of n2n^2 must have an even exponent. For n2n^2 to be divisible by 22×332^2 \times 3^3, the power of 2 in n2n^2 must be at least 2, so nn has at least one factor of 2. The power of 3 in n2n^2 must be an even integer greater than or equal to 3, meaning it must be at least 4. Thus, nn must contain at least two factors of 3 (32=93^2 = 9). Consequently, nn must be divisible by 21×32=182^1 \times 3^2 = 18. Statement (1) alone yields a definitive 'Yes'.
An integer's square must have even exponents for all its prime factors.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): n3n^3 is divisible by 243=35243 = 3^5.
For n3n^3 to be divisible by 353^5, the exponent of 3 in n3n^3 must be a multiple of 3 greater than or equal to 5, which means it must be at least 6. Therefore, nn must contain at least two factors of 3 (32=93^2 = 9). However, statement (2) places no restriction on whether nn is even. If n=9n = 9, n3=729=243×3n^3 = 729 = 243 \times 3 (divisible by 243), but 9 is NOT a multiple of 18. If n=18n = 18, n3=5832=243×24n^3 = 5832 = 243 \times 24 (divisible by 243), and 18 IS a multiple of 18. Since nn can yield both 'No' and 'Yes', Statement (2) alone is insufficient.
Testing specific values demonstrates that nn may or may not be even.

Anahtar Kavram

Prime Factor Exponents in Integer Powers and Data Sufficiency Sufficiency Logic
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 26Soru

If nn is a positive integer, is n2+3n+2n^2 + 3n + 2 divisible by 12?

(1) nn is a multiple of 3.
(2) n+1n + 1 is a prime number.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Factoring the stem expression gives n2+3n+2=(n+1)(n+2)n^2 + 3n + 2 = (n + 1)(n + 2). Statement (1) tells us nn is a multiple of 3, which implies neither n+1n + 1 nor n+2n + 2 is a multiple of 3. Consequently, their product can never be divisible by 3, and thus can never be divisible by 12. Because Statement (1) conclusively answers 'No' to the question stem, Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient. Statement (2) allows n=2n = 2 (giving 12, divisible by 12) and n=4n = 4 (giving 30, not divisible by 12), yielding both 'Yes' and 'No' responses, making Statement (2) alone insufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the question stem target using factoring.
The expression n2+3n+2n^2 + 3n + 2 factors into (n+1)(n+2)(n + 1)(n + 2). The question asks whether (n+1)(n+2)(n + 1)(n + 2) is divisible by 12=22×312 = 2^2 \times 3.
Factoring quadratic expressions helps reveal divisibility properties of consecutive integers.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): nn is a multiple of 3.
If n=3kn = 3k for some positive integer kk, then n+1=3k+1n + 1 = 3k + 1 and n+2=3k+2n + 2 = 3k + 2. Neither factor contains 3 as a prime factor, so their product (3k+1)(3k+2)(3k + 1)(3k + 2) leaves a remainder of 1×2=21 \times 2 = 2 when divided by 3. Since the product is never divisible by 3, it can NEVER be divisible by 12.
In a Yes/No Data Sufficiency question, a statement that yields a definitive 'No' to the question is SUFFICIENT.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): n+1n + 1 is a prime number.
If n=2n = 2, then n+1=3n + 1 = 3 (prime). The expression (2+1)(2+2)=12(2+1)(2+2) = 12, which is divisible by 12 (Answer: YES). If n=4n = 4, then n+1=5n + 1 = 5 (prime). The expression (4+1)(4+2)=30(4+1)(4+2) = 30, which is not divisible by 12 (Answer: NO). Since both 'Yes' and 'No' are possible, Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
Testing specific values shows that Statement (2) does not yield a consistent answer.

Anahtar Kavram

Definitive Yes/No decision logic in Data Sufficiency combined with divisibility and prime factor properties of consecutive integers.
Soru 27Soru

If nn is a real number, is nn an integer?

(1) n2+5nn^2 + 5n is an integer.

(2) n2nn^2 - n is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

Both statements together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.
Evaluating each statement alone shows that non-integer real numbers can produce integer values for n2+5nn^2 + 5n or n2nn^2 - n. However, combining both statements gives 6n=(n2+5n)(n2n)6n = (n^2 + 5n) - (n^2 - n), proving n=k6n = \frac{k}{6} for some integer kk. Substituting n=k6n = \frac{k}{6} back into n2nn^2 - n requires k26k36\frac{k^2 - 6k}{36} to be an integer, which forces k(k6)k(k-6) to be divisible by 36. Examining remainders modulo 6 shows kk must be a multiple of 6, ensuring nn is an integer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
If n2+5n=pn^2 + 5n = p where pp is an integer, nn can be an integer (e.g., n=1    n2+5n=6n=1 \implies n^2+5n=6) or a non-integer real number (e.g., n2+5n1=0    n=5+292n^2+5n-1=0 \implies n = \frac{-5 + \sqrt{29}}{2}, which gives n2+5n=1n^2+5n=1).
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
If n2n=qn^2 - n = q where qq is an integer, nn can be an integer (e.g., n=2    n2n=2n=2 \implies n^2-n=2) or a non-integer real number (e.g., n2n1=0    n=1+52n^2-n-1=0 \implies n = \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}, which gives n2n=1n^2-n=1).
3
Combine Statement (1) and Statement (2).
6n6n is equal to an integer k=pqk = p - q, so n=k6n = \frac{k}{6}.
Subtracting (n2n=q)(n^2 - n = q) from (n2+5n=p)(n^2 + 5n = p) yields 6n=pq6n = p - q. Since pp and qq are integers, k=pqk = p - q must be an integer.
4
Substitute n=k6n = \frac{k}{6} back into Statement (2) to check integer constraints on kk.
kk must be a multiple of 6, which implies n=k6n = \frac{k}{6} is an integer.
Substituting n=k6n = \frac{k}{6} into n2n=qn^2 - n = q gives (k6)2k6=k26k36=q\left(\frac{k}{6}\right)^2 - \frac{k}{6} = \frac{k^2 - 6k}{36} = q. Thus, 3636 must divide k(k6)k(k-6). Consequently, 66 divides k(k6)k(k-6). Since kk and k6k-6 have the same remainder rr modulo 6, k(k6)r2(mod6)k(k-6) \equiv r^2 \pmod 6. For r2r^2 to be divisible by 6 where r{0,1,2,3,4,5}r \in \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}, rr must be 00. Hence, kk is a multiple of 6, making nn an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Number properties of non-integer real variables vs. integer constraints when combining polynomial equations.
Soru 28Soru

If xx is a real number, is xx an integer?

(1) x2x^2 is an integer.
(2) 3x3x is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
Evaluating Statement (1) alone allows x=2x = \sqrt{2} (not an integer) or x=2x = 2 (an integer), so Statement (1) is insufficient. Evaluating Statement (2) alone allows x=13x = \frac{1}{3} (not an integer) or x=1x = 1 (an integer), so Statement (2) is insufficient. Combining both statements establishes that x=m3x = \frac{m}{3} for an integer mm, and x2=m29=kx^2 = \frac{m^2}{9} = k for an integer kk. This requires m2=9km^2 = 9k, which implies mm must be a multiple of 3. Hence xx must be an integer, giving a definitive 'Yes' answer. Thus, both statements together are sufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem constraint
xx is constrained to be a real number (xRx \in \mathbb{R}). The target question is a Yes/No question: 'Is xx an integer?'
Without an explicit integer constraint in the stem, non-integer real numbers must be tested as counterexamples.
2
Evaluate Statement (1) alone
If x=2x = \sqrt{2}, then x2=2x^2 = 2 (an integer), but xx is not an integer (Answer: No). If x=2x = 2, then x2=4x^2 = 4 (an integer), and xx is an integer (Answer: Yes). Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
Statement (1) allows both integer and non-integer values for xx.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) alone
If x=13x = \frac{1}{3}, then 3x=13x = 1 (an integer), but xx is not an integer (Answer: No). If x=1x = 1, then 3x=33x = 3 (an integer), and xx is an integer (Answer: Yes). Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
Statement (2) allows fractional values with a denominator of 3 as well as integers.
4
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) together
From Statement (2), x=m3x = \frac{m}{3} for some integer mm. Substituting into Statement (1) yields x2=(m3)2=m29=kx^2 = \left(\frac{m}{3}\right)^2 = \frac{m^2}{9} = k, where kk is an integer. Thus, m2=9km^2 = 9k. Since 9k9k is a multiple of 9, m2m^2 is divisible by 9, which means mm must be a multiple of 3. Let m=3pm = 3p for some integer pp. Then x=3p3=px = \frac{3p}{3} = p, which guarantees that xx is an integer. The answer is a definitive 'Yes'. Statements (1) and (2) together are SUFFICIENT.
Combining both conditions restricts xx to rational numbers whose square is an integer, forcing xx to be an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Number Properties and Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 29Soru

If xx is a positive real number, is xx an integer?

(1) x+1xx + \frac{1}{x} is an integer.

(2) x2+1xx^2 + \frac{1}{x} is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
The option stating that both statements together are sufficient is correct. Evaluating Statement (1) alone allows irrational solutions like x=3+52x = \frac{3+\sqrt{5}}{2}. Evaluating Statement (2) alone allows irrational roots of x33x+1=0x^3 - 3x + 1 = 0. However, combining both statements reveals that x2xx^2 - x is an integer. Subtracting the resulting linear system forces xx to be a rational number. For any positive rational x=pqx = \frac{p}{q} in simplest form, x+1xx + \frac{1}{x} being an integer requires p=1p = 1 and q=1q = 1, proving that x=1x = 1, which is an integer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
If x=1x = 1, then x+1x=2x + \frac{1}{x} = 2 (an integer), and xx is an integer. However, if x=3+522.618x = \frac{3 + \sqrt{5}}{2} \approx 2.618 (a positive real non-integer), then x+1x=3+52+352=3x + \frac{1}{x} = \frac{3 + \sqrt{5}}{2} + \frac{3 - \sqrt{5}}{2} = 3 (an integer). Since xx can be an integer or a non-integer, Statement (1) alone does not uniquely answer the question.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
If x=1x = 1, then x2+1x=2x^2 + \frac{1}{x} = 2 (an integer), and xx is an integer. If x2+1x=3x^2 + \frac{1}{x} = 3, multiplying by xx yields x33x+1=0x^3 - 3x + 1 = 0. Evaluating f(x)=x33x+1f(x) = x^3 - 3x + 1 shows f(1)=1<0f(1) = -1 < 0 and f(2)=3>0f(2) = 3 > 0, so by the Intermediate Value Theorem, there exists a real root x(1,2)x \in (1, 2), which is positive but not an integer. Hence, Statement (2) alone is insufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (1) and Statement (2) together.
Both statements together are SUFFICIENT.
Let x+1x=ax + \frac{1}{x} = a and x2+1x=bx^2 + \frac{1}{x} = b, where aa and bb are integers. Subtracting Statement (1) from Statement (2) gives (x2+1x)(x+1x)=ba    x2x=k\left(x^2 + \frac{1}{x}\right) - \left(x + \frac{1}{x}\right) = b - a \implies x^2 - x = k, where k=bak = b - a is an integer. From Statement (1), x2ax+1=0x^2 - ax + 1 = 0, and from the difference, x2xk=0x^2 - x - k = 0. Subtracting these two quadratic equations gives (1a)x+(1+k)=0(1 - a)x + (1 + k) = 0. For any positive real xx, a=x+1x2a = x + \frac{1}{x} \ge 2, so 1a01 - a \neq 0. Thus x=1+ka1x = \frac{1 + k}{a - 1}. Because kk and aa are integers, xx must be a rational number. Let x=pqx = \frac{p}{q} in lowest terms, where pp and qq are positive integers with gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1. Then x+1x=pq+qp=p2+q2pq=a    p2+q2=apqx + \frac{1}{x} = \frac{p}{q} + \frac{q}{p} = \frac{p^2 + q^2}{pq} = a \implies p^2 + q^2 = a p q. Since p2=q(apq)p^2 = q(ap - q), qq must divide p2p^2. But gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1, so q=1q = 1. Similarly, pp must divide q2q^2, so p=1p = 1. Thus x=1x = 1, which is an integer. Both statements together definitively answer YES.

Anahtar Kavram

Deduce integer constraints and rationality by combining non-linear algebraic expressions for real variables in Data Sufficiency.
Soru 30Soru

If pp and qq are positive real numbers, is pp an integer?

(1) p2+pqp^2 + pq is an integer.
(2) q2+pqq^2 + pq is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Cevap

Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to determine if pp is an integer.
The correct answer states that statements (1) and (2) together are not sufficient. Statement (1) alone allows p=0.5,q=1.5p = 0.5, q = 1.5 (giving p2+pq=1p^2+pq=1) as well as p=1,q=1p = 1, q = 1 (giving p2+pq=2p^2+pq=2). Statement (2) alone similarly allows p=0.5,q=1.5p = 0.5, q = 1.5 (giving q2+pq=3q^2+pq=3) as well as p=1,q=1p = 1, q = 1 (giving q2+pq=2q^2+pq=2). When both statements are evaluated together, adding the two equations reveals p+q=(p2+pq)+(q2+pq)p+q = \sqrt{(p^2+pq) + (q^2+pq)}. Choosing p2+pq=1p^2+pq = 1 and q2+pq=3q^2+pq = 3 yields p+q=2p+q = 2 and p=0.5p = 0.5, demonstrating that pp does not have to be an integer even when both statements are satisfied.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the Question Stem and Constraints
Variables pp and qq are positive real numbers (not constrained to integers). The goal is to determine if pp must be an integer.
Recognizing that variables are real numbers prevents premature integer assumptions.
2
Evaluate Statement (1) independently: p2+pq=p(p+q)p^2 + pq = p(p+q) is an integer
Case 1: If p=1p = 1 and q=1q = 1, then p(p+q)=1(2)=2p(p+q) = 1(2) = 2 (integer), so pp IS an integer.
Case 2: If p=0.5p = 0.5 and q=1.5q = 1.5, then p(p+q)=0.5(2)=1p(p+q) = 0.5(2) = 1 (integer), so pp IS NOT an integer.
Statement (1) is INSUFFICIENT.
Testing non-integer real values tests whether the condition forces pp to be an integer.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) independently: q2+pq=q(p+q)q^2 + pq = q(p+q) is an integer
Case 1: If p=1p = 1 and q=1q = 1, then q(p+q)=1(2)=2q(p+q) = 1(2) = 2 (integer), so pp IS an integer.
Case 2: If p=0.5p = 0.5 and q=1.5q = 1.5, then q(p+q)=1.5(2)=3q(p+q) = 1.5(2) = 3 (integer), so pp IS NOT an integer.
Statement (2) is INSUFFICIENT.
Statement (2) primarily constrains q(p+q)q(p+q), leaving pp unconstrained.
4
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) Combined
Let p(p+q)=k1p(p+q) = k_1 and q(p+q)=k2q(p+q) = k_2 where k1,k2k_1, k_2 are positive integers.
Adding gives (p+q)2=k1+k2    p+q=k1+k2(p+q)^2 = k_1 + k_2 \implies p+q = \sqrt{k_1 + k_2}.
Thus, p=k1k1+k2p = \frac{k_1}{\sqrt{k_1 + k_2}}.
Case 1: Let k1=1k_1 = 1 and k2=3k_2 = 3. Then p+q=4=2    p=12=0.5p+q = \sqrt{4} = 2 \implies p = \frac{1}{2} = 0.5 (not an integer).
Case 2: Let k1=2k_1 = 2 and k2=2k_2 = 2. Then p+q=4=2    p=22=1p+q = \sqrt{4} = 2 \implies p = \frac{2}{2} = 1 (an integer).
Since pp can still be either an integer or a non-integer, both statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.
Algebraic combination yields p=k1k1+k2p = \frac{k_1}{\sqrt{k_1 + k_2}}, which produces non-integers for appropriate choices of integer constants k1k_1 and k2k_2.

Anahtar Kavram

Avoiding Implicit Integer Assumptions in Real-Valued Data Sufficiency
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 31Soru

If nn is a positive integer, is nn divisible by 18?

(1) n2n^2 is divisible by 54.
(2) n3n^3 is divisible by 108.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) establishes that n2n^2 is divisible by 54=21×3354 = 2^1 \times 3^3. Because the exponent of 3 in n2n^2 is 2b2b, the condition 2b32b \geq 3 implies b1.5b \geq 1.5, which forces b2b \geq 2 since bb must be an integer. Similarly, 2a1    a12a \geq 1 \implies a \geq 1. Therefore, nn must contain at least 21×32=182^1 \times 3^2 = 18 as a factor, guaranteeing that nn is divisible by 18 (Definitive Yes). Statement (2) establishes that n3n^3 is divisible by 108=22×33108 = 2^2 \times 3^3, which only forces a1a \geq 1 and b1b \geq 1, so nn must only be a multiple of 6. Since n=6n = 6 yields a 'No' and n=18n = 18 yields a 'Yes', Statement (2) is insufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the question target in terms of prime factorization
For a positive integer nn to be divisible by 18=21×3218 = 2^1 \times 3^2, the prime factorization of nn must contain at least one factor of 2 and at least two factors of 3.
Decomposing the target integer into prime factors establishes clear minimum exponent thresholds for evaluation.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): n2n^2 is divisible by 54=21×3354 = 2^1 \times 3^3
If n=2a×3b×kn = 2^a \times 3^b \times k, then n2=22a×32b×k2n^2 = 2^{2a} \times 3^{2b} \times k^2. Divisibility by 21×332^1 \times 3^3 requires 2a1    a12a \geq 1 \implies a \geq 1 and 2b3    b22b \geq 3 \implies b \geq 2 (since aa and bb are integers). Thus nn must contain at least 21×32=182^1 \times 3^2 = 18, giving a definitive YES.
Integer constraints on exponents force fractional lower bounds to round up to the next integer.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): n3n^3 is divisible by 108=22×33108 = 2^2 \times 3^3
If n3=23a×33b×k3n^3 = 2^{3a} \times 3^{3b} \times k^3, then 3a2    a13a \geq 2 \implies a \geq 1 and 3b3    b13b \geq 3 \implies b \geq 1. Thus nn must be divisible by 21×31=62^1 \times 3^1 = 6. Testing values: if n=6n = 6, 63=2166^3 = 216 (divisible by 108), but 6 is NOT divisible by 18 (NO). If n=18n = 18, 183=583218^3 = 5832 (divisible by 108), and 18 IS divisible by 18 (YES). Statement (2) is INSUFFICIENT.
Testing specific values demonstrates that Statement (2) allows both 'Yes' and 'No' outcomes.

Anahtar Kavram

Prime Factor Exponent Analysis under Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 32Soru

If mm and nn are positive real numbers, is m+nm + n an integer?

(1) m2n2m^2 - n^2 is a prime number.
(2) mnm - n is a positive integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Cevap

Statements (1) and (2) together are NOT sufficient.
The correct answer is that both statements combined are insufficient. A common high-level trap in GMAT Data Sufficiency is assuming variables must be integers when the stem specifies 'real numbers'. Combining (mn)(m+n)=p(m - n)(m + n) = p (prime) with mn=km - n = k (positive integer) gives m+n=pkm + n = \frac{p}{k}. If m=2.25m = 2.25 and n=0.25n = 0.25, we get mn=2m - n = 2 (integer) and m2n2=5m^2 - n^2 = 5 (prime), but m+n=2.5m + n = 2.5 (not an integer). Conversely, m=2m = 2 and n=1n = 1 gives mn=1m - n = 1 and m2n2=3m^2 - n^2 = 3 (prime), where m+n=3m + n = 3 (an integer). Because both an affirmative and a negative answer are possible, the information remains insufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
If m2n2=2m^2 - n^2 = 2 (a prime number), we could have m=2m = 2 and n=2n = √2, giving m+n=2+2m + n = 2 + √2 (not an integer). Alternatively, m=2m = 2 and n=1n = 1 gives m2n2=3m^2 - n^2 = 3 (prime) and m+n=3m + n = 3 (an integer). Hence, Statement (1) alone is insufficient.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
If mn=2m - n = 2, we could have m=3.5m = 3.5 and n=1.5n = 1.5, giving m+n=5m + n = 5 (an integer). Or we could have m=3.2m = 3.2 and n=1.2n = 1.2, giving m+n=4.4m + n = 4.4 (not an integer). Hence, Statement (2) alone is insufficient.
3
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) combined.
Test for consistency with both integer and non-integer outcomes for m+nm + n.
We know m2n2=(mn)(m+n)=pm^2 - n^2 = (m - n)(m + n) = p, where pp is prime and mn=km - n = k is a positive integer. Thus k(m+n)=pk(m + n) = p, so m+n=pkm + n = \frac{p}{k}.
4
Construct concrete counterexamples under both combined statements.
Statements (1) and (2) together are NOT sufficient.
Case 1 (YES): Let m=2m = 2 and n=1n = 1. Then m2n2=3m^2 - n^2 = 3 (prime) and mn=1m - n = 1 (positive integer). Here, m+n=3m + n = 3, which IS an integer.
Case 2 (NO): Let m=2.25m = 2.25 and n=0.25n = 0.25. Both are positive real numbers. mn=2.250.25=2m - n = 2.25 - 0.25 = 2 (positive integer). m2n2=(2.250.25)(2.25+0.25)=2×2.5=5m^2 - n^2 = (2.25 - 0.25)(2.25 + 0.25) = 2 \times 2.5 = 5 (prime number). But m+n=2.25+0.25=2.5m + n = 2.25 + 0.25 = 2.5, which is NOT an integer. Since m+nm + n can be an integer or a non-integer, both statements together are not sufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Implicit Integer Constraints vs. Real Number Definitions in Data Sufficiency
Soru 33Soru

If rr and ss are positive integers, is r2s2r^2 - s^2 divisible by 8?

(1) rr and ss are both odd integers.
(2) r+sr + s is divisible by 4.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

Each statement alone is sufficient to answer the question with a definitive 'Yes'.
The correct response identifies that each statement alone gives a definitive 'Yes' answer. Statement (1) shows that the square of any odd integer is 1(mod8)1 \pmod 8, so subtracting two odd squares gives 0(mod8)0 \pmod 8. Statement (2) shows r+sr+s is a multiple of 4, which forces rr and ss to share parity, making rsr-s even and their product (r+s)(rs)(r+s)(r-s) a multiple of 4×2=84 \times 2 = 8.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the question target using algebraic factorization.
Note that r2s2=(r+s)(rs)r^2 - s^2 = (r + s)(r - s). The question asks whether (r+s)(rs)(r + s)(r - s) is a multiple of 8.
Factoring difference of squares isolates the sum and difference components to easily test parity and divisibility.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): rr and ss are both odd integers.
Any odd integer can be written as 2k+12k + 1. Squaring gives (2k+1)2=4k2+4k+1=4k(k+1)+1(2k + 1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 = 4k(k + 1) + 1. Since k(k+1)k(k + 1) is the product of two consecutive integers, it is always even, making 4k(k+1)4k(k + 1) a multiple of 8. Thus, any odd integer squared leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 8. Therefore, r21(mod8)r^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 8 and s21(mod8)s^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 8, so r2s211=0(mod8)r^2 - s^2 \equiv 1 - 1 = 0 \pmod 8.
Statement (1) alone yields a definitive 'Yes', so Statement (1) is sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): r+sr + s is divisible by 4.
If r+sr + s is divisible by 4, then r+s=4mr + s = 4m for some integer mm. Since r+sr + s is even, rr and ss must have the same parity (either both even or both odd). Consequently, their difference rs=(r+s)2s=4m2s=2(2ms)r - s = (r + s) - 2s = 4m - 2s = 2(2m - s) is an even integer (a multiple of 2). Multiplying (r+s)(r + s) by (rs)(r - s) yields (multiple of 4)×(multiple of 2)=multiple of 8(\text{multiple of } 4) \times (\text{multiple of } 2) = \text{multiple of } 8.
Statement (2) alone yields a definitive 'Yes', so Statement (2) is sufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Divisibility Rules of Difference of Squares and Parity of Integers
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 34Soru

If aa and bb are positive integers, is a2ba^2b divisible by 1212?

(1) ab2ab^2 is divisible by 1818.
(2) a3ba^3b is divisible by 7272.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (2) alone guarantees that a3ba^3b contains at least three factors of 22 and two factors of 33. Analyzing the exponent bounds for non-negative integers proves that a2ba^2b must contain at least two factors of 22 and one factor of 33, ensuring a2ba^2b is divisible by 1212. Statement (1) alone is insufficient because a=3,b=6a=3, b=6 makes ab2=108ab^2=108 (divisible by 1818) but a2b=54a^2b=54 (not divisible by 1212). Thus, Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Rephrase the target question in terms of prime factorization
For a2ba^2b to be divisible by 12=22×3112 = 2^2 \times 3^1, we need 2v2(a)+v2(b)22 v_2(a) + v_2(b) \ge 2 and 2v3(a)+v3(b)12 v_3(a) + v_3(b) \ge 1, where vp(n)v_p(n) is the exponent of prime pp in the prime factorization of nn.
Decomposing divisibility into prime factor exponent inequalities allows definitive evaluation of sufficiency.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): ab2ab^2 is divisible by 18=21×3218 = 2^1 \times 3^2
This gives v2(a)+2v2(b)1v_2(a) + 2 v_2(b) \ge 1 and v3(a)+2v3(b)2v_3(a) + 2 v_3(b) \ge 2. Test counterexample a=3,b=6a=3, b=6: ab2=3×36=108ab^2 = 3 \times 36 = 108 (divisible by 18), but a2b=9×6=54a^2b = 9 \times 6 = 54, which is not divisible by 12.
A single valid counterexample proves Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): a3ba^3b is divisible by 72=23×3272 = 2^3 \times 3^2
This gives 3v2(a)+v2(b)33 v_2(a) + v_2(b) \ge 3 and 3v3(a)+v3(b)23 v_3(a) + v_3(b) \ge 2. If v2(a)=0v_2(a) = 0, then v2(b)3    2v2(a)+v2(b)32v_2(b) \ge 3 \implies 2 v_2(a) + v_2(b) \ge 3 \ge 2. If v2(a)1v_2(a) \ge 1, then 2v2(a)+v2(b)2(1)+0=22 v_2(a) + v_2(b) \ge 2(1) + 0 = 2. Similarly for prime 3: if v3(a)=0v_3(a) = 0, v3(b)2    2v3(a)+v3(b)21v_3(b) \ge 2 \implies 2 v_3(a) + v_3(b) \ge 2 \ge 1; if v3(a)1v_3(a) \ge 1, 2v3(a)+v3(b)212 v_3(a) + v_3(b) \ge 2 \ge 1. Thus a2ba^2b is always divisible by 12.
Statement (2) strictly guarantees that the prime factor counts for 2 and 3 in a2ba^2b meet or exceed the required thresholds, yielding a definitive 'Yes'.

Anahtar Kavram

Divisibility analysis using prime factor exponent inequalities in Data Sufficiency.
Soru 35Soru

If xx and yy are non-zero real numbers, is xy\frac{x}{y} an integer?

(1) x2+y2=5xyx^2 + y^2 = 5xy
(2) xx is a prime number and xyxy is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) allows us to set up a quadratic equation for the ratio xy\frac{x}{y}, yielding (xy)25(xy)+1=0\left(\frac{x}{y}\right)^2 - 5\left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + 1 = 0. The roots of this quadratic equation are 5±212\frac{5 \pm \sqrt{21}}{2}, which are irrational numbers. Therefore, xy\frac{x}{y} cannot be an integer under any circumstance, providing a definitive 'No' answer to the question. Statement (1) is therefore sufficient. Statement (2) allows xy\frac{x}{y} to be an integer (e.g., x=3,y=1x=3, y=1) or a non-integer (e.g., x=3,y=2x=3, y=2), so it is not sufficient. Thus, the option stating that Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient is the correct choice.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the target question stem
The target asks if the quotient xy\frac{x}{y} is an integer, where xx and yy are real numbers (not restricted to integers).
Establishing that xx and yy are real numbers prevents making unjustified integer assumptions.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): x2+y2=5xyx^2 + y^2 = 5xy
Divide both sides by y2y^2 (since y0y \neq 0): (xy)2+1=5(xy)\left(\frac{x}{y}\right)^2 + 1 = 5\left(\frac{x}{y}\right), which rearranges to (xy)25(xy)+1=0\left(\frac{x}{y}\right)^2 - 5\left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + 1 = 0. Setting k=xyk = \frac{x}{y}, we get k25k+1=0k^2 - 5k + 1 = 0. Solving for kk using the quadratic formula gives k=5±212k = \frac{5 \pm \sqrt{21}}{2}.
Since 21\sqrt{21} is irrational, k=xyk = \frac{x}{y} is an irrational number and can NEVER be an integer.
3
Determine sufficiency for Statement (1)
Statement (1) yields a definitive 'No' to the question 'Is xy\frac{x}{y} an integer?'. Thus, Statement (1) alone is SUFFICIENT.
In Data Sufficiency Yes/No questions, a definitive 'No' answer is a sufficient result.
4
Evaluate Statement (2): xx is a prime number and xyxy is an integer
Case A: Let x=3x = 3 and y=1y = 1. Then xy=3xy = 3 (an integer), and xy=3\frac{x}{y} = 3 (an integer) -> YES.
Case B: Let x=3x = 3 and y=2y = 2. Then xy=6xy = 6 (an integer), and xy=32\frac{x}{y} = \frac{3}{2} (not an integer) -> NO.
Because xy\frac{x}{y} can be an integer or not an integer, Statement (2) alone is NOT sufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Data Sufficiency Yes/No decision logic combined with irrational root analysis and real number constraints.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 36Soru

If xx and yy are positive integers, is x+yx + y divisible by 3?

(1) x2+y2x^2 + y^2 is divisible by 3.
(2) x2y2x^2 - y^2 is divisible by 3.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (1) alone is sufficient because the square of any integer leaves a remainder of 0 or 1 when divided by 3. The only way for x2+y2x^2 + y^2 to be a multiple of 3 is if both x2x^2 and y2y^2 leave remainders of 0, meaning both xx and yy are multiples of 3. Therefore, x+yx + y must be a multiple of 3. Statement (2) alone is not sufficient because x2y2=(xy)(x+y)x^2 - y^2 = (x - y)(x + y) being divisible by 3 allows x+yx + y to be divisible by 3 (e.g., x=2,y=1x = 2, y = 1) or not divisible by 3 (e.g., x=4,y=1x = 4, y = 1).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze remainder properties of perfect squares modulo 3.
For any integer zz, z20(mod3)z^2 \equiv 0 \pmod 3 if zz is a multiple of 3, and z21(mod3)z^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 3 if zz is not a multiple of 3.
Establishing the possible values of perfect squares modulo 3 simplifies the evaluation of both statements.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): x2+y2x^2 + y^2 is divisible by 3.
Since x2(mod3){0,1}x^2 \pmod 3 \in \{0, 1\} and y2(mod3){0,1}y^2 \pmod 3 \in \{0, 1\}, the sum x2+y20(mod3)x^2 + y^2 \equiv 0 \pmod 3 can only occur if x20(mod3)x^2 \equiv 0 \pmod 3 and y20(mod3)y^2 \equiv 0 \pmod 3. This implies both xx and yy are divisible by 3, so x+yx + y must also be divisible by 3.
Statement (1) yields a definitive 'Yes' answer, making it sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): x2y2x^2 - y^2 is divisible by 3.
Factor as (xy)(x+y)(x - y)(x + y). If x=2x = 2 and y=1y = 1, x2y2=3x^2 - y^2 = 3 (divisible by 3) and x+y=3x + y = 3 (divisible by 3, answer Yes). If x=4x = 4 and y=1y = 1, x2y2=15x^2 - y^2 = 15 (divisible by 3) and x+y=5x + y = 5 (not divisible by 3, answer No).
Since statement (2) yields both 'Yes' and 'No' outcomes, it is not sufficient.

Anahtar Kavram

Quadratic Remainder Constraints in Data Sufficiency
Soru 37Soru

If mm and nn are positive real numbers, is mm an integer?

(1) m2nm^2 n is an integer and mn2m n^2 is an integer.
(2) m3nm^3 n is an integer and nn is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Cevap

Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Statements (1) and (2) together are not sufficient because setting m=12m = \frac{1}{2} and n=8n = 8 satisfies all given conditions (m2n=2m^2 n = 2, mn2=32m n^2 = 32, m3n=1m^3 n = 1, n=8n = 8) while yielding a 'No' to whether mm is an integer. Meanwhile, m=1m = 1 and n=8n = 8 also satisfies all conditions and yields a 'Yes'. Therefore, the two statements combined do not uniquely determine if mm is an integer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) is insufficient.
If m=1m = 1 and n=2n = 2, then m2n=2m^2 n = 2 and mn2=4m n^2 = 4 (both integers), and m=1m = 1 is an integer. However, if m=23m = \sqrt[3]{2} and n=43n = \sqrt[3]{4}, then m2n=2m^2 n = 2 and mn2=2m n^2 = 2 (both integers), but m=23m = \sqrt[3]{2} is not an integer.
2
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) is insufficient.
If m=1m = 1 and n=1n = 1, then m3n=1m^3 n = 1 and n=1n = 1 (both integers), and m=1m = 1 is an integer. However, if m=12m = \frac{1}{2} and n=8n = 8, then n=8n = 8 is an integer and m3n=(18)(8)=1m^3 n = (\frac{1}{8})(8) = 1 is an integer, but m=12m = \frac{1}{2} is not an integer.
3
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) together.
Statements (1) and (2) together are insufficient.
Test the candidate case m=12m = \frac{1}{2} and n=8n = 8 against both statements simultaneously:
- Under Statement (1): m2n=(14)(8)=2m^2 n = (\frac{1}{4})(8) = 2 (integer) and mn2=(12)(64)=32m n^2 = (\frac{1}{2})(64) = 32 (integer).
- Under Statement (2): n=8n = 8 (integer) and m3n=(18)(8)=1m^3 n = (\frac{1}{8})(8) = 1 (integer).
Here, all conditions from both statements are satisfied, but m=12m = \frac{1}{2} is NOT an integer. Conversely, m=1m = 1 and n=8n = 8 also satisfies both statements and m=1m = 1 IS an integer. Thus, a definitive Yes/No answer cannot be determined.

Anahtar Kavram

Implicit real number constraints versus integer constraints in Data Sufficiency polynomial expressions.
Soru 38Soru

If xx is a positive integer, is x2+5xx^2 + 5x divisible by 6?

(1) xx is a prime number.
(2) x+1x + 1 is divisible by 3.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

Cevap

Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
Factoring the stem expression gives x(x+5)x(x+5). For any positive integer xx, one of xx or x+5x+5 is even, making x(x+5)x(x+5) divisible by 2. Thus, the question reduces to whether x(x+5)x(x+5) is divisible by 3. Statement (1) allows x=2x=2 (x2+5x=14x^2+5x=14, not divisible by 6) and x=3x=3 (x2+5x=24x^2+5x=24, divisible by 6), yielding both 'No' and 'Yes' responses, so it is insufficient. Statement (2) states that x+1x+1 is a multiple of 3, meaning x2(mod3)x \equiv 2 \pmod 3. Evaluating x(x+5)2(2+5)=142(mod3)x(x+5) \equiv 2(2+5) = 14 \equiv 2 \pmod 3 shows x2+5xx^2+5x is never divisible by 3, and therefore never divisible by 6. This consistent 'No' answer makes Statement (2) alone sufficient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze and rephrase the question stem target expression.
Factor x2+5x=x(x+5)x^2 + 5x = x(x + 5). Since xx and x+5x + 5 have opposite parity, their product is always even (divisible by 2). Thus, x2+5xx^2 + 5x is divisible by 6 if and only if x(x+5)x(x + 5) is divisible by 3.
Determining divisibility by 6 requires checking divisibility by both 2 and 3.
2
Evaluate Statement (1): xx is a prime number.
If x=2x = 2, x2+5x=14x^2 + 5x = 14, which is not divisible by 6 (Answer: NO). If x=3x = 3, x2+5x=24x^2 + 5x = 24, which is divisible by 6 (Answer: YES). Since both 'Yes' and 'No' are possible, Statement (1) alone is INSUFFICIENT.
A statement must yield a single consistent answer ('Yes' or 'No') to be sufficient.
3
Evaluate Statement (2): x+1x + 1 is divisible by 3.
If x+1x + 1 is divisible by 3, then x=3k1x = 3k - 1 for some integer k1k \ge 1. Substituting x=3k1x = 3k - 1 into x(x+5)x(x + 5) yields (3k1)(3k+4)=9k2+9k4(3k - 1)(3k + 4) = 9k^2 + 9k - 4. Dividing this expression by 3 gives a remainder of 2. Because x(x+5)x(x + 5) is never divisible by 3, x2+5xx^2 + 5x is NEVER divisible by 6.
A definitive 'No' answer for all permitted values of xx establishes sufficiency.

Anahtar Kavram

Number Properties and Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency

Alternatif Yöntem

Test explicit values for Statement (2): x{2,5,8,11}x \in \{2, 5, 8, 11\}. Evaluating x2+5xx^2 + 5x yields 14,50,104,17614, 50, 104, 176, none of which are divisible by 6. Recognizing this uniform 'No' outcome confirms Statement (2) is sufficient.
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 39Soru

If kk is a real number, is kk an integer?

(1) k2k^2 is an integer.
(2) k3k^3 is an integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Cevap

BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
The correct option states that both statements together are sufficient, but neither alone is sufficient. Statement (1) allows irrational square roots like 2\sqrt{2}, making it insufficient. Statement (2) allows irrational cube roots like 23\sqrt[3]{2}, making it insufficient. Combined, taking the ratio k3k2=k\frac{k^3}{k^2} = k shows that kk is the quotient of two integers and therefore rational. A rational number whose square is an integer must be an integer itself, giving a definitive 'Yes'.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate Statement (1): k2k^2 is an integer.
If k=2k = 2, k2=4k^2 = 4 (an integer) and kk is an integer (Yes). If k=2k = \sqrt{2}, k2=2k^2 = 2 (an integer), but kk is not an integer (No). Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
The question specifies kk is a real number, so non-integer square roots must be tested.
2
Evaluate Statement (2): k3k^3 is an integer.
If k=2k = 2, k3=8k^3 = 8 (an integer) and kk is an integer (Yes). If k=23k = \sqrt[3]{2}, k3=2k^3 = 2 (an integer), but kk is not an integer (No). Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
Cube roots of non-cube integers yield irrational real numbers.
3
Evaluate Statement (1) and Statement (2) combined.
If k=0k = 0, kk is an integer (Yes). If k0k \neq 0, then k=k3k2k = \frac{k^3}{k^2}. Since k3k^3 and k2k^2 are both integers, kk must be a rational number. Let k=pqk = \frac{p}{q} in simplest form where p,qZp, q \in \mathbb{Z} and gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1. Since k2=p2q2k^2 = \frac{p^2}{q^2} is an integer and gcd(p2,q2)=1\gcd(p^2, q^2) = 1, q2q^2 must equal 11, so q=±1q = \pm 1. Thus, kk is an integer. Combined, the statements are SUFFICIENT.
Combining algebraic operations reveals that kk is rational, and a rational number with an integer square must itself be an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Data Sufficiency evaluation of number properties with real number constraints and rational number properties
Soru 40Soru

If xx and yy are positive real numbers, is the product xyxy an odd integer?

(1) x2yx^2y is an odd integer.
(2) xy2xy^2 is an odd integer.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Cevap

Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
The correct option is the choice stating that Statements (1) and (2) together are NOT sufficient. Since xx and yy are positive real numbers, setting x=y=33x = y = \sqrt[3]{3} satisfies both x2y=3x^2y = 3 and xy2=3xy^2 = 3 (both odd integers), but gives xy=93xy = \sqrt[3]{9}, which is not an integer. Conversely, setting x=1/33x = 1/\sqrt[3]{3} and y=93y = \sqrt[3]{9} yields x2y=3x^2y = 3 and xy2=9xy^2 = 9 (both odd integers), giving xy=3xy = 3, which is an odd integer. Because both a 'No' and a 'Yes' answer are possible, the information remains insufficient even when both statements are combined.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stem constraints and target question.
The target asks whether xyxy is an odd integer, given that xx and yy are positive real numbers (not necessarily integers).
Recognizing that xx and yy are not restricted to integers is essential to avoid invalid integer assumption traps.
2
Evaluate Statement (1) independently.
Statement (1) gives x2y=kx^2y = k for some odd integer kk. If x=3x = \sqrt{3} and y=1y = 1, then x2y=3x^2y = 3 (an odd integer), but xy=3xy = \sqrt{3} (not an integer). If x=3x = 3 and y=1y = 1, then x2y=9x^2y = 9 (an odd integer) and xy=3xy = 3 (an odd integer). Thus, Statement (1) alone is NOT sufficient.
Testing non-integer values demonstrates that xyxy may or may not be an integer.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) independently.
Statement (2) gives xy2=mxy^2 = m for some odd integer mm. If x=1x = 1 and y=3y = \sqrt{3}, then xy2=3xy^2 = 3 (an odd integer), but xy=3xy = \sqrt{3} (not an integer). If x=1x = 1 and y=3y = 3, then xy2=9xy^2 = 9 (an odd integer) and xy=3xy = 3 (an odd integer). Thus, Statement (2) alone is NOT sufficient.
Symmetry with Statement (1) confirms that Statement (2) alone produces variable outcomes.
4
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) combined.
Multiplying the two expressions gives (x2y)(xy2)=x3y3=(xy)3=km(x^2y)(xy^2) = x^3y^3 = (xy)^3 = km. Since kk and mm are odd integers, their product kmkm is also an odd integer, say PP. Thus, (xy)3=P    xy=P3(xy)^3 = P \implies xy = \sqrt[3]{P}. If k=3k = 3 and m=3m = 3, then P=9P = 9, so xy=93xy = \sqrt[3]{9} (not an integer). If k=3k = 3 and m=9m = 9, then P=27P = 27, so xy=273=3xy = \sqrt[3]{27} = 3 (an odd integer). Because xyxy can be either an odd integer or a non-integer, the combined statements are NOT sufficient.
Combining the statements yields (xy)3(xy)^3 equal to an odd integer, which does not guarantee that xyxy itself is an integer.

Anahtar Kavram

Implicit Real vs. Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
ÖncekiSayfa 2 / 2
Number Properties and Integer Constraints in Data Sufficiency Alıştırma Soruları — GMAT — Sayfa 2 | Examkin