Examkin

Critical Reasoning: Inference and Conclusions

88 soru

Tüm türler88Çoktan seçmeli48Doğru / Yanlış23Eşleştirme9Boşluk doldurma8
Soru 81Soru →

Under regional environmental regulation protocols, a coastal marine sanctuary receives Tier-1 Protection status if and only if it contains a documented coral spawning site and strictly prohibits all commercial fishing activities. Based on these regulations, evaluate the following statement:

A coastal marine sanctuary that lacks a documented coral spawning site cannot receive Tier-1 Protection status.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The statement is a valid deduction because a documented coral spawning site is a necessary condition for receiving Tier-1 Protection status.
The term 'if and only if' establishes a biconditional link, making a documented coral spawning site a strictly necessary condition for Tier-1 Protection status. Consequently, any sanctuary lacking such a site cannot meet the criteria for Tier-1 status, rendering the statement definitively True.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional structure of the stimulus premise.
Tier-1 Status   ⟺  \iff (Documented Coral Spawning Site AND Commercial Fishing Prohibited).
The phrase 'if and only if' denotes a biconditional relationship where both components are mutually necessary and sufficient.
2
Evaluate the condition presented in the statement.
The sanctuary lacks a documented coral spawning site.
We need to test what happens when one of the necessary conditions is negated.
3
Deduce the logical outcome based on the premise.
Since a necessary condition is negated, Tier-1 Status cannot be achieved (¬Spawning Site  ⟹  ¬Tier-1 Status\neg\text{Spawning Site} \implies \neg\text{Tier-1 Status}).
Negating a necessary condition guarantees the negation of the outcome.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary and sufficient conditions in biconditional logic statements
Soru 82Soru →

Consider the following passage:

'An economic survey of municipal utility providers in 2025 established that every utility that integrated grid-scale battery storage unit Model X achieved a grid reliability rating exceeding 98 percent. Furthermore, during that year, no municipal utility provider that achieved a grid reliability rating exceeding 98 percent experienced forced load-shedding events during peak summer hours.'

True or False: The assertion 'Municipal utility providers that integrated grid-scale battery storage unit Model X in 2025 reduced their long-term operational maintenance expenses' is a valid logical inference directly supported by the passage.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: False

Cevap

False. The assertion represents an unwarranted speculation rather than a valid logical inference because the passage contains no information regarding operational maintenance expenses.
On GMAT Critical Reasoning, a valid inference must strictly follow from the stated premises without requiring additional unstated assumptions. The passage links battery storage Model X to high grid reliability ratings and zero load-shedding events. It contains no information regarding maintenance costs or financial expenses. Claiming that expenses were reduced is an extrapolation beyond the passage's scope, making the statement false.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stated premises in the passage.
Premise 1: Battery storage Model X integration implies grid reliability rating > 98%. Premise 2: Grid reliability rating > 98% implies zero forced load-shedding events.
Establishing the scope of factual premises isolates what can be strictly deduced.
2
Evaluate the target assertion against the scope of the premises.
The target assertion claims that utility providers reduced their long-term operational maintenance expenses.
A valid GMAT inference must be strictly 'Must Be True' based solely on the given premises without requiring outside assumptions.
3
Distinguish between a valid inference and an unstated assumption/speculation.
Because maintenance expenses are never mentioned or logically entailed by grid reliability ratings or load-shedding data, assuming a cost reduction is speculative.
Plausible real-world connections cannot substitute for direct textual proof on Critical Reasoning inference items.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing Valid Inferences from Unwarranted Speculations
Soru 83Soru →

In a four-year botanical field study of desert flora, researchers tracked seed germination rates for the rare annual plant species *Salvia deserti*. During dry years, fewer than 5 percent of observed *Salvia deserti* seeds germinated, whereas in years receiving above-average rainfall, over 80 percent of observed seeds germinated. Throughout the entire four-year study, every recorded instance of *Salvia deserti* seed germination occurred exclusively in soil containing elevated concentrations of nitrogen compounds.

Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: During the four-year study, no observed *Salvia deserti* seed germinated in soil that lacked elevated concentrations of nitrogen compounds.

Cevap

During the four-year study, no observed *Salvia deserti* seed germinated in soil that lacked elevated concentrations of nitrogen compounds.
The correct response directly follows from the factual premise stating that every recorded instance of germination during the study occurred exclusively in soil with elevated nitrogen compounds. Logically, if 100% of germinated seeds were in elevated-nitrogen soil, then 0% of germinated seeds were in soil lacking elevated nitrogen during that observation period.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the premises provided in the passage.
Identified three factual premises: (1) Dry year germination < 5%; (2) High rainfall germination > 80%; (3) All recorded germinations occurred exclusively in soil with elevated nitrogen.
GMAT inference questions require identifying an answer that must be strictly true based solely on the given premises without introducing unstated assumptions.
2
Differentiate strict logical deductions (inferences) from unstated assumptions and broad speculations.
Recognized that 'all A occurred in B' logically guarantees that 'no A occurred in non-B' within the observed sample frame.
An inference must remain strictly within the factual bounds of the provided data, avoiding causal leaps or universal claims.
3
Evaluate the choices against the strict deduction.
The statement asserting that no observed seed germinated in soil lacking elevated nitrogen compounds directly mirrors the premise without adding outside assumptions.
This is a mathematically valid converse formulation of the explicit premise.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing Valid Inferences from Assumptions and Speculations
Soru 84Soru →

Although proponents of government price caps on essential prescription drugs argue that such measures are vital to protect low-income patients from exorbitant healthcare costs, economic analysts point out that artificial price ceilings drastically reduce the projected revenue from newly developed therapies. Consequently, pharmaceutical companies will inevitably divert their funding away from high-risk, groundbreaking drug discovery toward safer, incremental modifications of existing medications. Because long-term therapeutic progress relies fundamentally on pioneering research rather than minor product iterations, implementing strict price caps on prescription drugs will ultimately undermine public health outcomes.

Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Enacting strict government regulation on prescription drug prices will in the long run prove detrimental to overall public health.

Cevap

Enacting strict government regulation on prescription drug prices will in the long run prove detrimental to overall public health.
The correct answer accurately states the author's final claim: that implementing strict price caps on prescription drugs will ultimately undermine public health outcomes. The preceding sentences detail how price caps reduce revenue, leading pharmaceutical companies to shift R&D to safer modifications, which in turn leads to the overall negative impact on public health.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify structural indicators and separate premises from conclusions.
The word 'Although' introduces a counter-perspective ('protect low-income patients'), followed by supporting evidence regarding reduced revenues and R&D shift.
Understanding the structural flow reveals which claims serve as support and which serves as the destination of the argument.
2
Distinguish between intermediate conclusions and the ultimate final claim.
The claim that firms will shift funding away from discovery is supported by revenue evidence, but itself supports the final sentence introduced by 'will ultimately undermine...'.
The main conclusion is the claim for which all other statements in the passage provide support, directly or indirectly.
3
Select the option that accurately paraphrases the ultimate final claim.
The final claim asserts that implementing strict price caps on prescription drugs will ultimately undermine public health outcomes.
The correct paraphrase directly captures this final judgment without overstating its scope.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the Main Conclusion by distinguishing it from premises, concessions, and intermediate conclusions.
Soru 85Soru →

Read the argument below regarding retail pricing algorithms, then match each statement from the text to its corresponding logical role within the argument.

Argument:
Although proponents of automated dynamic pricing systems argue that such algorithms merely optimize market efficiency by responding instantly to supply fluctuations, regulators note that concurrent deployment of identical algorithms by competing retailers frequently leads to implicit price coordination. Such algorithmic tacit collusion artificially inflates consumer prices even in the absence of explicit communication among firms. Because existing antitrust laws require proof of explicit agreement to establish illegal price-fixing, current legal frameworks are fundamentally ill-equipped to curb algorithmic collusion. Regulators must therefore update antitrust standards to encompass market outcomes generated by shared pricing algorithms.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Regulators must update antitrust standards to encompass market outcomes generated by shared pricing algorithms.
Current legal frameworks are fundamentally ill-equipped to curb algorithmic collusion.
Concurrent deployment of identical algorithms by competing retailers frequently leads to implicit price coordination.
Automated dynamic pricing systems merely optimize market efficiency by responding instantly to supply fluctuations.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct matches map each excerpt to its exact structural role in the argument: the policy directive regarding updating antitrust standards is the main conclusion; the claim that current frameworks are ill-equipped is an intermediate conclusion; the observation about price coordination is a supporting premise; and the claim about optimizing market efficiency is an opposing viewpoint.
The argument builds logically toward a specific policy recommendation: updating antitrust standards. The statement regarding current frameworks being ill-equipped functions as a subsidiary conclusion supported by legal premises, which in turn justifies the main claim. The observation that identical algorithms lead to price coordination is a factual premise supporting the existence of market failure, and the assertion about optimizing market efficiency represents an opposing perspective introduced in a concessionary clause.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the overall structure and direction of the argument.
Identify the author's primary goal: persuading the audience that antitrust standards must be updated.
The author uses 'therefore' in the final sentence to mark the overarching prescriptive recommendation.
2
Distinguish the main conclusion from supporting sub-claims.
Categorize the statement about current frameworks being ill-equipped as an intermediate conclusion.
This sub-claim is supported by the requirement of explicit agreement proof and itself explains why standards must be updated.
3
Identify evidence premises and opposing context.
Classify the statement regarding implicit price coordination as a factual premise, and the proponents' efficiency argument as an opposing viewpoint.
The efficiency claim is prefaced by 'Although proponents... argue', indicating a concession/counter-position, while the price coordination statement provides empirical evidence.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying structural roles and distinguishing main conclusions from intermediate conclusions and premises.
Soru 86Soru →

Read the argument below regarding subglacial Antarctic lake exploration, then match each statement from the text to its corresponding logical role within the argument.

Argument:
Recent drillings into subglacial Antarctic lakes revealed microbial communities surviving in complete darkness. Astrobiologists frequently argue that discovering such extremophiles proves life could easily thrive in the subsurface oceans of icy moons like Europa. However, terrestrial subglacial lakes benefit from geothermal heat sources and chemical influxes from surrounding bedrock that are likely absent on icy celestial bodies. Thus, terrestrial extremophile survival cannot be treated as an exact model for extraterrestrial habitability. Consequently, researchers must establish direct spectroscopic criteria for extraterrestrial life rather than relying on terrestrial analogs.

Which statement matches which logical role?

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Terrestrial subglacial lakes benefit from geothermal heat sources and chemical influxes from surrounding bedrock that are likely absent on icy celestial bodies.
Discovering such extremophiles proves life could easily thrive in the subsurface oceans of icy moons like Europa.
Terrestrial extremophile survival cannot be treated as an exact model for extraterrestrial habitability.
Researchers must establish direct spectroscopic criteria for extraterrestrial life rather than relying on terrestrial analogs.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The statement detailing geothermal heat and chemical influxes functions as a factual premise countering the opposing view. The assertion that extremophiles prove life on Europa represents the opposing position. The claim that terrestrial survival cannot be an exact model is an intermediate sub-conclusion. The final recommendation that researchers must establish direct spectroscopic criteria is the main conclusion of the argument.
The argument builds toward a final actionable recommendation introduced by 'Consequently': researchers must establish direct spectroscopic criteria. The factual statement about geothermal heat serves as a premise leading to the intermediate conclusion ('Thus, terrestrial extremophile survival cannot be treated as an exact model'), which directly supports the ultimate recommendation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the structural pivot and main recommendation in the passage.
The indicator 'Consequently' signals the author's ultimate claim: researchers must establish direct spectroscopic criteria for extraterrestrial life rather than relying on terrestrial analogs.
The main conclusion is the final claim supported by all preceding evidence and sub-conclusions in the argument.
2
Analyze the role of intermediate inferences and opposing claims.
'Thus' signals an intermediate sub-conclusion ('terrestrial extremophile survival cannot be treated as an exact model'), which bridges the premise about heat sources and bedrock influxes to the final recommendation.
Distinguishing between intermediate conclusions and final claims prevents confusing subsidiary steps with the author's ultimate point.
3
Map each statement to its structural role.
Pair the opposing claim, supporting premise, intermediate conclusion, and main conclusion to their respective statements.
Ensures complete alignment across all components of the logical argument structure.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Main Conclusions and Intermediate Arguments in Critical Reasoning
Soru 87Soru →

In 2022, organic crop protection treatments accounted for exactly 25 percent of all crop protection treatments applied in Region Z. By 2025, organic treatments accounted for 40 percent of all crop protection treatments in the region. During the same 2022–2025 period, the total number of non-organic crop protection treatments applied in Region Z decreased by 20 percent. If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true regarding crop protection treatments in Region Z?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The total number of crop protection treatments applied in Region Z was the same in 2025 as it was in 2022.

Cevap

The total number of crop protection treatments applied in Region Z was the same in 2025 as it was in 2022.
The option stating that total crop protection treatments remained the same in 2025 as in 2022 is logically inescapable. In 2022, non-organic treatments accounted for 75%75\% of total applications. A 20%20\% decrease in non-organic treatments leaves 0.75×0.80=60%0.75 \times 0.80 = 60\% of the original 2022 total volume. Since non-organic treatments represent 60%60\% of the 2025 total volume (as organic is 40%40\%), 60%60\% of the 2025 total equals 60%60\% of the 2022 total. Thus, the total overall volume did not change.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define total treatments in 2022 as T2022T_{2022} and express 2022 non-organic treatments.
Non-organic treatments in 2022 equaled 75%75\% of T2022T_{2022}, or 0.75⋅T20220.75 \cdot T_{2022}.
Since organic treatments were 25%25\%, non-organic treatments comprised the remaining 75%75\%.
2
Calculate the absolute number of non-organic treatments in 2025.
Non-organic treatments in 2025 equaled 0.75⋅T2022⋅(1−0.20)=0.60⋅T20220.75 \cdot T_{2022} \cdot (1 - 0.20) = 0.60 \cdot T_{2022}.
The stimulus states that non-organic treatments decreased by 20%20\% from 2022 to 2025.
3
Relate the 2025 non-organic treatment count to the total 2025 treatments (T2025T_{2025}).
In 2025, non-organic treatments were 60%60\% of T2025T_{2025}, so 0.60⋅T2025=0.60⋅T20220.60 \cdot T_{2025} = 0.60 \cdot T_{2022}, which simplifies to T2025=T2022T_{2025} = T_{2022}.
Because organic treatments were 40%40\% of T2025T_{2025}, non-organic treatments accounted for 60%60\% of T2025T_{2025}.

Anahtar Kavram

Calculating absolute values from relative percentages and percentage changes
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 88Soru →

In 2024, Meridian Health System operated 10 general hospitals. In 2025, to lower hospital-acquired infection rates, Meridian introduced stricter hygiene protocols across all 10 hospitals. By the end of 2025, the proportion of admitted patients who contracted a hospital-acquired infection at Meridian hospitals fell from 4.0 percent in 2024 to 2.5 percent in 2025. During that same period, the total number of patient admissions across the 10 hospitals increased by 80 percent.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The absolute number of patients who contracted a hospital-acquired infection at Meridian hospitals was higher in 2025 than in 2024.

Cevap

The total absolute number of patients who contracted a hospital-acquired infection at Meridian hospitals was higher in 2025 than in 2024.
The correct response logically follows from combining the percentage rate with total volume changes. In 2024, infections equaled 4.0% of total admissions NN (0.04N0.04N). In 2025, admissions grew to 1.80N1.80N, and 2.5% of 1.80N1.80N equals 0.045N0.045N. Because 0.045N0.045N is greater than 0.04N0.04N, the total number of infected patients was higher in 2025.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Define base variables from the premise.
Let NN be the total number of patient admissions in 2024. The number of infected patients in 2024 is 0.04×N0.04 \times N.
Establishing raw counts relative to the baseline allows mathematical comparison.
2
Calculate the total admissions and infection count for 2025.
2025 admissions = 1.80×N1.80 \times N. The number of infected patients in 2025 is 0.025×(1.80×N)=0.045×N0.025 \times (1.80 \times N) = 0.045 \times N.
Applying the 80 percent increase in total volume alongside the 2.5 percent rate yields the new absolute count.
3
Compare the 2024 and 2025 absolute infection counts.
0.045×N>0.040×N0.045 \times N > 0.040 \times N, meaning the absolute number of infections increased.
Since 0.045>0.0400.045 > 0.040, it is mathematically necessary that more total patients contracted infections in 2025 than in 2024.

Anahtar Kavram

Disambiguating proportion/percentage changes from changes in absolute total volume when base values change.
ÖncekiSayfa 5 / 5
Critical Reasoning: Inference and Conclusions Alıştırma Soruları — GMAT — Sayfa 5 | Examkin