Consider the following sentence from an essay on art criticism and museum governance:
"Notwithstanding the curator’s insistence that the recent reattribution of the Renaissance portrait was not entirely without precedent, the panel’s refusal to disavow the traditional attribution was hardly uncalculated, serving less to endorse the traditional claim on its merits than to prevent a precipitous devaluation of the gallery’s permanent collection."
Which of the following best captures the main assertion made by the sentence regarding the panel's decision?
- The decision to retain the traditional attribution was a deliberate strategy motivated primarily by protecting the collection's financial value rather than by belief in the traditional claim.Cevap
- BThe decision to abandon the traditional attribution was an impulsive error resulting from the panel's failure to recognize historical precedents.
- CThe panel reached a scholarly consensus with the curator because the reattribution was backed by overwhelming historical evidence.
- DThe panel kept the traditional attribution solely because they were genuinely convinced of its aesthetic and historical authenticity.
- EThe panel's action was entirely unconsidered and inadvertently accelerated the devaluation of the gallery's holdings.
Cevap
The decision to retain the traditional attribution was a deliberate strategy motivated primarily by protecting the collection's financial value rather than by belief in the traditional claim.
The sentence constructs a series of syntactical reversals: 'refusal to disavow' means deciding to maintain the traditional attribution, 'hardly uncalculated' means the action was deliberate, and 'serving less to endorse... than to prevent devaluation' clarifies that financial/institutional protection was the primary motivation behind the choice.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Parsing Complex Syntax, Reversals, and Double Negatives