An organic apple orchard installed owl nesting boxes throughout its acreage six months ago to control the local field mouse population without using chemical pesticides. Recent surveys show that the field mouse population in the orchard has declined by 40 percent over the past six months. The orchard owner concludes that the presence of owls attracted by the nesting boxes caused the reduction in the field mouse population. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the orchard owner's argument?
- Three months ago, the orchard introduced several feral barn cats specifically trained to hunt field mice across the property.Cevap
- BAnalysis of owl pellets collected near the nesting boxes revealed bone fragments of field mice native to the orchard.
- CChemical pesticides used in non-organic orchards in the region are more effective at eliminating field mice than biological control methods.
- DThe cost of building and maintaining owl nesting boxes is significantly less than the annual expense of purchasing chemical pesticides.
- ERegional predatory bird populations have grown steadily across the state over the past decade.
Cevap
The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that the orchard introduced several feral barn cats three months ago to hunt field mice across the property.
The correct option introduces a plausible alternative cause for the decline in the field mouse population. Showing that barn cats were introduced during the same period undermines the conclusion that the owls were the cause of the decrease.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Weakening Arguments - Alternative Cause