Soru

Zorluk: KolayInferences and Implicit Meaning

For over a century, lichenology was dominated by the view that lichens were single, discrete organisms belonging to a unique class of fungi. In 1867, Swiss botanist Simon Schwendener proposed a dual hypothesis, asserting that lichens are instead composite organisms consisting of a fungus and a photosynthetic alga existing in a symbiotic partnership. Initial reaction from established botanists was overwhelmingly negative; prominent mycologists dismissed Schwendener’s claim as an absurd speculation that undermined traditional taxonomic systems. Critics argued that the fungal hyphae merely parasitized trapped algal cells rather than establishing a mutually beneficial relationship. However, as microscopic techniques improved in the late nineteenth century, researchers consistently observed that the algal component remained healthy and reproducing within the fungal matrix, eventually confirming that both organisms contribute to the survival of the composite lichen structure.

Which of the following can be inferred from the passage regarding the dominant scientific consensus in lichenology prior to Schwendener's 1867 proposal?

  1. It classified lichens as single, distinct fungal entities rather than as partnerships between different organisms.Cevap
  2. B
    It recognized that fungal hyphae and algal cells existed in a mutually beneficial relationship.
  3. C
    It maintained that microscopic analysis was an invalid method for botanical classification.
  4. D
    It categorized algae as parasitic organisms that infected fungal matrices.
  5. E
    It entirely excluded lichens from any established taxonomic framework.

Cevap

Prior to Schwendener's proposal, the scientific consensus viewed lichens as individual fungal organisms rather than composite partnerships between distinct species.
The passage directly establishes that before Schwendener's 1867 proposal, lichenology was dominated by the perspective that lichens were single, discrete organisms belonging to a unique fungal class. Therefore, inferring that the consensus viewed lichens as individual fungal entities rather than dual-species partnerships is logically inescapable and fully supported by text evidence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the key focus of the question.
The question asks what can be inferred about the consensus in lichenology prior to Schwendener's proposal in 1867.
Directing focus to the specific timeframe mentioned in the passage allows for accurate retrieval of premise facts.
2
Locate relevant evidence in the text.
The opening sentence states that 'lichenology was dominated by the view that lichens were single, discrete organisms belonging to a unique class of fungi.'
This baseline view represents the consensus before Schwendener introduced his dual organism hypothesis.
3
Evaluate the choices against the passage evidence.
The statement describing lichens as single, distinct fungal entities rather than partnerships accurately reformulates the opening claim of the passage.
An inference in GRE Reading Comprehension must be strictly supported by unstated implications or direct restatements of passage facts.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying implicit meaning and direct inferences supported by passage evidence
Bu soruyu puanla