Soru

Zorluk: OrtaRhetorical Structure and Sentence Function

For much of the early nineteenth century, geologists attributed the distribution of erratic boulders across Northern Europe to diluvial currents or icebergs drifting across submerged continents. In 1837, Louis Agassiz proposed a radical alternative: a vast, continental ice sheet had once covered the region, transporting debris as it expanded and retreated. Initial reception among established geologists was largely hostile, as Agassiz’s hypothesis challenged the uniformitarian framework popularized by Charles Lyell, which favored gradual, ongoing marine processes over sudden, catastrophic terrestrial glaciation. To substantiate his model, Agassiz cited distinctive striations carved into bedrock—features that drifting icebergs could not systematically produce over elevated terrain. Subsequent field investigations by William Buckland in Scotland revealed identical striations, compelling key skeptics to reconsider. Consequently, what began as a highly contentious challenge to geological orthodoxy ultimately shifted the paradigm of Quaternary geology, demonstrating that terrestrial ice sheets could account for topography previously thought to require oceanic submergence.

Which of the following statements correctly describes the rhetorical function of a specific element within the passage? Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.

  1. The reference to distinctive striations carved into bedrock serves to present empirical evidence that supported Agassiz's model against rival hypotheses.Cevap
  2. The mention of William Buckland's field investigations functions to illustrate how independent empirical corroboration contributed to shifting opinion among skeptical geologists.Cevap
  3. C
    The description of the hostile initial reception by established geologists serves to prove that Charles Lyell's uniformitarian framework was invalid across all geological domains.

Cevap

The statements noting that bedrock striations present empirical evidence supporting Agassiz's model and that William Buckland's investigations illustrate independent corroboration shifting skeptic opinion are both correct.
The passage explicitly connects the bedrock striations to Agassiz's effort to substantiate his model against drifting iceberg theories. Furthermore, Buckland's field findings in Scotland are cited directly as the turning point that compelled skeptics to reconsider, illustrating the role of corroborating evidence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the rhetorical purpose of mentioning bedrock striations.
Agassiz introduced bedrock striations as physical evidence that could not be explained by the competing iceberg drift theory.
This establishes why the bedrock striations function as supporting empirical evidence for his model.
2
Evaluate the role of William Buckland's field investigations in the narrative structure.
Buckland's findings provided independent verification in a different region (Scotland), leading skeptics to reconsider.
This shows how empirical corroboration influenced institutional acceptance of the new paradigm.
3
Examine the claim regarding the initial hostility and Lyell's framework.
The passage explains the initial resistance in the context of Quaternary glaciation, without declaring Lyell's framework invalid across all geological fields.
Extrapolating total invalidity across all domains goes beyond the passage's stated scope and purpose.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying sentence functions and structural roles within dense academic prose
Bu soruyu puanla