Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorStructural Integration of Counterarguments & Rebuttals

An essay analyzing public policy toward basic scientific research includes the following body paragraph draft:

"Directing state grants toward fundamental scientific research yields unpredictable, long-term technological breakthroughs that market-driven private investment routinely overlooks. Opponents argue that taxpayers should not fund speculative studies with no immediate commercial utility, especially during economic downturns. However, this view is misguided because fundamental science is inherently valuable."

Which of the following structural revisions best integrates the counterargument and rebuttal into the paragraph's overall line of reasoning?

  1. Concede that private capital naturally prioritizes short-term ROI, position the opposing view on taxpayer expense as a valid constraint, and then rebut by showing how public funding specifically addresses this market failure by establishing foundational knowledge that private industry later commercializes.Cevap
  2. B
    Retain the opposing claim regarding economic downturns, but immediately dismiss it by asserting that scientific progress is inherently superior to short-term fiscal constraints without analyzing the economic trade-offs.
  3. C
    Move the opposing argument about taxpayer expenditure during fiscal downturns into a standalone, isolated paragraph at the end of the essay, leaving the main body paragraph focused exclusively on technological breakthroughs.
  4. D
    Revise the paragraph to claim that private sector research produces zero valuable scientific discoveries, thereby rendering the opponents' emphasis on commercial utility entirely invalid.
  5. E
    Accept the opponents' premise that basic research lacks immediate economic return, and conclude that public funding should therefore be suspended until fiscal stability is restored.

Cevap

The structural revision that concedes private capital's short-term focus, frame the objection about taxpayer risk, and rebuts by demonstrating how public funding mitigates market failures to enable downstream private commercialization.
The correct response establishes a sophisticated line of reasoning. It acknowledges the legitimate concern raised by critics (short-term private market incentives and taxpayer risk) and uses that very context to justify state intervention as a solution to market failure, seamlessly tying the counterargument back to the central thesis.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the draft paragraph's structural flaw
The current draft presents a weak, circular rebuttal ('this view is misguided because fundamental science is inherently valuable') that fails to address the economic substance of the counterargument.
Effective integration requires directly answering the opponent's premise rather than resorting to dogmatic assertions.
2
Evaluate how a strong rebuttal functions in GRE AWA essays
A high-scoring counterargument integration acknowledges the valid points of the objection (concession), contextualizes the objection within the broader debate, and provides a logical pivot (rebuttal) that bridges back to supporting the thesis.
Demonstrating complex, multi-perspective reasoning is essential for upper-tier GRE Analytical Writing scores.
3
Select the structural arrangement that provides genuine integration
The revision framing public research funding as a necessary mechanism to correct private market failures provides a substantive, logically integrated rebuttal.
It directly reconciles the tension between short-term taxpayer costs and long-term public benefit.

Anahtar Kavram

Structural Integration of Counterarguments & Rebuttals
Tahmini Süre:2m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Structural Integration of Counterarguments & Rebuttals

Bu konudan daha fazla soru