Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorWeakening Arguments

Analysis of fossilized tooth enamel from *Gigantopithecus*, a giant primate that inhabited Southeast Asia during the Pleistocene epoch, revealed consistently low carbon-13 isotope ratios across late Pleistocene specimens. In mammalian herbivores, low carbon-13 ratios reflect a diet dominated by C3C_3 foliage from dense forest canopies, whereas elevated carbon-13 ratios indicate consumption of C4C_4 grasses typical of open savannahs. Because regional climate records show that open grasslands expanded significantly while dense forests shrank during this period, researchers concluded that *Gigantopithecus* went extinct primarily because its rigid dietary dependence on deep-forest C3C_3 vegetation prevented it from adapting to expanding grassland habitats.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researchers' argument?

  1. Fossilized botanical remains indicate that several widespread species of bamboo—a C3C_3 plant that yields low carbon-13 signatures—thrived predominantly in open grassland clearings rather than beneath dense forest canopies.Cevap
  2. B
    Other large primate species inhabiting the same geographic region during the late Pleistocene experienced severe population declines as dense forest cover diminished.
  3. C
    Carbon-13 isotope ratios in the fossilized tooth enamel of apex carnivores living in Southeast Asia were largely unaffected by shifts between forest and grassland ecosystems.
  4. D
    Early hominin populations in Southeast Asia expanded their territorial range and hunting activities around the same time that *Gigantopithecus* fossil density began to decrease.
  5. E
    Geological evidence demonstrates that regional grassland expansion accelerated significantly during the middle Pleistocene, several hundred thousand years prior to the extinction of *Gigantopithecus*.

Cevap

The argument is most weakened by the finding that bamboo—a C3C_3 plant producing low carbon-13 isotope signatures—grew abundantly in open grassland clearings rather than exclusively in dense forests.
The researchers base their conclusion on the assumption that low carbon-13 ratios (indicating C3C_3 plant consumption) strictly imply reliance on shrinking dense forest canopies. The correct option demonstrates that bamboo is a C3C_3 plant (generating low carbon-13 signatures) that thrived in open grassland clearings. If *Gigantopithecus* fed on bamboo in open clearings, its low carbon-13 levels do not prove it was confined to deep forests, directly weakening the claim that dietary rigidity prevented it from adapting to expanding open environments.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
Premise 1: Low carbon-13 ratios in teeth reflect a C3C_3 plant diet, while high ratios reflect C4C_4 grasses.
Premise 2: *Gigantopithecus* teeth showed low carbon-13 ratios during a period when dense forests shrank and grasslands expanded.
Conclusion: *Gigantopithecus* went extinct because it was restricted to deep-forest C3C_3 vegetation and could not adapt to expanding grassland habitats.
Deconstructing the argument reveals the underlying assumption: that consuming C3C_3 plants requires living in and relying upon dense forest canopies.
2
Identify the logical vulnerability or unstated assumption.
The argument assumes that C3C_3 plants were available only in shrinking dense forests. If C3C_3 plants were abundant in open habitats, low carbon-13 ratios would not prove an inability to forage in open environments.
To weaken a causal argument based on proxy evidence, one must break the link between the evidence (low carbon-13) and the inferred constraint (inability to utilize open habitats).
3
Evaluate the choices to find the statement that undermines this assumption.
The choice showing that bamboo is a C3C_3 plant flourishing in open grassland clearings breaks the link. It shows that *Gigantopithecus* could have inhabited and fed in open environments while still producing low carbon-13 tooth signatures.
This provides an alternative explanation consistent with the isotope data that directly contradicts the conclusion of habitat-based starvation.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening Arguments via Alternative Interpretations of Evidence
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Weakening Arguments

Bu konudan daha fazla soru