Soru

Zorluk: OrtaRhetorical Structure and Sentence Function

Read the passage below:

While nineteenth-century agricultural chemistry was long dominated by Justus von Liebig's "mineral theory"—which asserted that plants absorb nitrogen exclusively from inorganic soil nitrates derived from decaying organic matter—the French agronomist Jean-Baptiste Boussingault introduced a methodological counterweight through precise quantitative crop-rotation accounting. Boussingault measured the total nitrogen content of seeds, harvested crops, and soil amendments across multi-year rotations on his Alsatian estate. Crucially, he observed that leguminous plants such as clover accumulated significantly more nitrogen than could be accounted for by soil depletion alone, whereas cereal crops exhibited a strict nitrogen deficit relative to soil inputs. Although Boussingault stopped short of identifying the biological mechanism—namely, symbiotic bacterial nitrogen fixation in root nodules, which was not demonstrated until decades later—his empirical accounting directly challenged Liebig's reductionist chemical framework. By demonstrating that certain crop sequences actively enriched soil nitrogen reserves, Boussingault provided a rigorously documented rationale for traditional crop rotation practices that mainstream chemical theory had previously dismissed as mere empirical folklore.

Which of the following best describes the primary rhetorical function of the sentence noting that leguminous plants accumulated significantly more nitrogen than could be accounted for by soil depletion alone?

  1. It provides specific empirical evidence that undermines the theoretical assumption established at the beginning of the passage.Cevap
  2. B
    It summarizes the core premise underlying Justus von Liebig's mineral theory of plant nutrition.
  3. C
    It articulates the specific biological mechanism responsible for symbiotic nitrogen fixation.
  4. D
    It serves as a qualification that limits the scope of Boussingault's overall methodology.
  5. E
    It offers a speculative hypothesis intended to defend traditional crop rotation against scientific skepticism.

Cevap

The sentence functions primarily to provide specific empirical evidence that undermines the theoretical assumption established at the beginning of the passage.
The correct choice accurately identifies the rhetorical purpose of the targeted sentence. The opening of the passage introduces Liebig's mineral theory, which posited that soil nitrates were the sole source of plant nitrogen. Boussingault's finding that clover accumulated nitrogen in excess of soil depletion constitutes the key empirical data point that disproves Liebig's model.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural role of the passage's opening theoretical premise.
The opening sentence introduces Justus von Liebig's 'mineral theory,' which claimed plant nitrogen derives strictly from inorganic soil nitrates.
Establishing the prevailing paradigm sets up the context for Boussingault's intervention.
2
Evaluate the targeted sentence's specific content and empirical nature.
The sentence reports Boussingault's observation that legumes accumulate more nitrogen than soil depletion alone allows.
This finding presents concrete data that cannot be explained by Liebig's framework.
3
Determine how the targeted sentence connects to the broader argument in the passage.
The observation directly serves as the factual basis that challenged Liebig's reductionist framework and supported traditional crop rotation.
The sentence supplies the empirical pivot upon which the main conflict of the passage turns.

Anahtar Kavram

Rhetorical Role of Empirical Evidence in Countering Established Hypotheses
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla