Soru

Zorluk: OrtaExplicit Detail Retrieval

Passage:
In 1867, Swiss botanist Simon Schwendener proposed the dual hypothesis of lichens, asserting that lichens were not autonomous plants but rather composite organisms consisting of a green alga trapped within a parasitic fungus. Initially met with fierce resistance from traditional lichenologists who viewed the fungal component as a structural tissue of a single plant, Schwendener’s framework gained gradual support as microscopic staining techniques improved. In 1879, German mycologist Heinrich Anton de Bary expanded Schwendener’s concept by coining the term 'symbiosis' to describe the living together of unlike organisms. Crucially, de Bary departed from Schwendener’s strictly antagonistic model of fungal parasitism; instead, de Bary posited a broad spectrum of symbiotic associations, ranging from mutually beneficial mutualism to destructive parasitism. De Bary demonstrated that while certain fungal hyphae absorb nutrients directly from algal cells without causing immediate host death, the algal partner retains photosynthetic capabilities that nourish the fungal matrix.

Which of the following statements regarding nineteenth-century theories of lichen biology is explicitly supported by the passage? Select all that apply.

  1. Traditional lichenologists initially rejected Schwendener's dual hypothesis because they considered the fungal element to be structural tissue belonging to an individual plant.Cevap
  2. B
    De Bary's definition of symbiosis restricted the relationship between unlike organisms exclusively to mutually beneficial interactions.
  3. In de Bary's model, algal cells involved in lichen associations maintain their ability to perform photosynthesis.Cevap

Cevap

The supported statements are that traditional lichenologists viewed the fungal element as structural tissue of a single plant, and that algal cells retain their photosynthetic capabilities under de Bary's model.
The passage provides explicit text evidence for two of the statements. First, it explicitly mentions that traditional lichenologists resisted Schwendener's framework because they viewed the fungal component as a structural tissue of a single plant. Second, it explicitly states that the algal partner retains photosynthetic capabilities that nourish the fungal matrix.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Scan the passage for references to traditional lichenologists and Schwendener's dual hypothesis.
The text states that traditional lichenologists resisted the hypothesis because they 'viewed the fungal component as a structural tissue of a single plant.' This directly supports the statement regarding traditional lichenologists' initial rejection.
Explicit detail retrieval requires matching passage facts directly with the offered claims.
2
Examine the passage's description of de Bary's definition of symbiosis.
The passage explains that de Bary 'posited a spectrum of symbiotic associations, ranging from mutually beneficial mutualism to destructive parasitism.' The statement claiming that symbiosis was restricted exclusively to mutually beneficial interactions misreads this restrictive modifier.
Options containing restrictive words like 'exclusively' must be verified against passage qualifiers.
3
Evaluate the claim regarding the photosynthetic capabilities of algal cells in de Bary's model.
The final sentence explicitly states that 'the algal partner retains photosynthetic capabilities that nourish the fungal matrix.' This directly supports the claim.
Direct paraphrase matching confirms explicit support.

Anahtar Kavram

Explicit Detail Retrieval
Bu soruyu puanla